ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A complete distributed constraint optimization method for non-traditional pseudotree arrangements
Full text PdfPdf (319 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Distributed constraint processing: full papers table of contents
Article No. 111  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-81-904262-7-5
Authors
James Atlas  University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Keith Decker  University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Sponsor
: IFAAMAS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1329125.1329262
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Distributed Constraint Optimization (DCOP) is a general framework that can model complex problems in multiagent systems. Several current algorithms that solve general DCOP instances, including ADOPT and DPOP, arrange agents into a traditional pseudotree structure. We introduce an extension to the DPOP algorithm that handles an extended set of pseudotree arrangements. Our algorithm correctly solves DCOP instances for pseudotrees that include edges between nodes in separate branches. The algorithm also solves instances with traditional pseudotree arrangements using the same procedure as DPOP.

We compare our algorithm with DPOP using several metrics including the induced width of the pseudotrees, the maximum dimensionality of messages and computation, and the maximum sequential path cost through the algorithm. We prove that for some problem instances it is not possible to generate a traditional pseudotree using edge-traversal heuristics that will outperform a cross-edged pseudotree. We use multiple heuristics to generate pseudotrees and choose the best pseudotree in linear space-time complexity. For some problem instances we observe significant improvements in message and computation sizes compared to DPOP.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Liu and K. P. Sycara. Exploiting problem structure for distributed constraint optimization. In V. Lesser, editor, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 246--254, San Francisco, CA, 1995. MIT Press.
 
2
3
 
4
A. Petcu. Frodo: A framework for open/distributed constraint optimization. Technical Report No. 2006/001 2006/001, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne (Switzerland), 2006. http://liawww.epfl.ch/frodo/.
 
5
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. A-dpop: Approximations in distributed optimization. In poster in CP 2005, pages 802--806, Sitges, Spain, October 2005.
 
6
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. Dpop: A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In IJCAI 05, pages 266--271, Edinburgh, Scotland, Aug 2005.
7
 
8
G. Ushakov. Solving meeting scheduling problems using distributed pseudotree-optimization procedure. Master's thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2005.
 
9
M. Yokoo, E. H. Durfee, T. Ishida, and K. Kuwabara. Distributed constraint satisfaction for formalizing distributed problem solving. In International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 614--621, 1992.
 
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
James Atlas: colleagues
Keith Decker: colleagues