ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Redoubtable Sensor Networks
Full text PdfPdf (340 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 11 ,  Issue 3  (March 2008) table of contents
Article No. 13  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Roberto Di Pietro  Università di Roma Tre, Italy
Luigi V. Mancini  Sapienza - Università di Roma, Italy
Alessandro Mei  Sapienza - Università di Roma, Italy
Alessandro Panconesi  Sapienza - Università di Roma, Italy
Jaikumar Radhakrishnan  Tata Istitute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 268,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1341731.1341734
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We give, for the first time, a precise mathematical analysis of the connectivity and security properties of sensor networks that make use of the random predistribution of keys. We also show how to set the parameters---pool and key ring size---in such a way that the network is not only connected with high probability via secure links but also provably resilient, in the following sense: We formally show that any adversary that captures sensors at random with the aim of compromising a constant fraction of the secure links must capture at least a constant fraction of the nodes of the network. In the context of wireless sensor networks where random predistribution of keys is employed, we are the first to provide a mathematically precise proof, with a clear indication of parameter choice, that two crucial properties---connectivity via secure links and resilience against malicious attacks---can be obtained simultaneously. We also show in a mathematically rigorous way that the network enjoys another strong security property. The adversary cannot partition the network into two linear size components, compromising all the links between them, unless it captures linearly many nodes. This implies that the network is also fault tolerant with respect to node failures. Our theoretical results are complemented by extensive simulations that reinforce our main conclusions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Bollobas, B. 1998. Modern Graph Theory. Springer.
 
6
 
7
Conti, M., Di Pietro, R., and Mancini, L. V. 2007. Ecce: Enhanced cooperative channel establishment for secure pairwise communication in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 5, 1, 49--62.
 
8
9
10
 
11
Erdös, P. and Rényi, A. 1960. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 5, 17--61.
12
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167--256.
 
17
18
 
19
Singer-Cohen, K. B. 1995. Random intersection graphs. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University.
 
20
 
21
Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small world” networks. Nature 393, 440--442.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roberto Di Pietro: colleagues
Luigi V. Mancini: colleagues
Alessandro Mei: colleagues
Alessandro Panconesi: colleagues
Jaikumar Radhakrishnan: colleagues