ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Stochastic analyses for online combinatorial optimization problems
Full text PdfPdf (518 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages 942-951  
Year of Publication: 2008
Authors
Naveen Garg  Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India
Anupam Gupta  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Stefano Leonardi  University of Rome "La Sapienza", Via Salaria, Rome, Italy
Piotr Sankowski  University of Rome "La Sapienza", Via Salaria, Rome, Italy
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 102,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study online algorithms when the input is not chosen adversarially, but consists of draws from some given probability distribution. While this model has been studied for online problems like paging and k-server, it is not known how to beat the Φ(log n) bound for online Steiner tree if at each time instant, the demand vertex is a uniformly random vertex from the graph. For the online Steiner tree problem, we show that if each demand vertex is an independent draw from some probability distribution π: V → [0, 1], a variant of the natural greedy algorithm achieves Eω[A(ω)]/Eω[OPT (ω)] = O(1); moreover, this result can be extended to some other subadditive problems. Both assumptions that the input sequence consists of independent draws from π, and that π is known to the algorithm are both essential; we show (almost) logarithmic lower bounds if either assumption is violated. Moreover, we give preliminary results on extending the Steiner tree results above to the related "expected ratio" measure Eω[ω(ω)/OPT (ω)]. Finally, we use these ideas to give an average-case analysis of the Universal TSP problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Susanne Albers. Online algorithms: a survey. Math. Program., 97(1--2, Ser. B):3--26, 2003. ISMP, 2003 (Copenhagen).
2
 
3
Noga Alon and Yossi Azar. On-line Steiner trees in the Euclidean plane. Discrete Comput. Geom., 10(2):113--121, 1993.
 
4
Luca Becchetti. Modelling locality: a probabilistic analysis of LRU and FWF. In Algorithms---ESA 2004, volume 3221 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 98--109. Springer, Berlin, 2004.
 
5
S. Ben-David and A. Borodin. A new measure for the study of on-line algorithms. Algorithmica, 11(1):73--91, 1994.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Moses Charikar, Chandra Chekuri, and Martin Pál. Sampling bounds for stochastic optimization. In Approximation, randomization and combinatorial optimization, volume 3624 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 257--269. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
 
9
 
10
F. Eisenbrand, F. Grandoni, T. Rothvoß, and G. Schäfer. A tighter analysis of random sampling for connected facility location. Submitted, 2007.
11
 
12
 
13
Amos Fiat and Gerhard J. Woeginger, editors. Online algorithms, volume 1442 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. The state of the art, Papers from the Workshop on the Competitive Analysis of On-line Algorithms held in Schloss Dagstuhl, June 1996.
14
 
15
Dimitris Fotakis. On the competitive ratio for online facility location. In Automata, languages and programming, volume 2719 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 637--652. Springer, Berlin, 2003.
 
16
 
17
18
19
 
20
Makoto Imase and Bernard M. Waxman. Dynamic Steiner tree problem. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 4(3):369--384, 1991.
 
21
 
22
Sandy Irani and Anna R. Karlin. On online computation. In Dorit Hochbaum, editor, Approximation Algorithms for NP Hard Problems. PWS publishing Co, 1996.
 
23
24
 
25
 
26
Anna R. Karlin, Mark S. Manasse, Larry Rudolph, and Daniel D. Sleator. Competitive snoopy caching. Algorithmica, 3(1):79--119, 1988.
 
27
 
28
Samir Khuller, Balaji Raghavachari, and Neal E. Young. Balancing minimum spanning and shortest path trees. Algorithmica, 14(4):305--322, 1995.
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
32
33
 
34
C. A. Phillips, C. Stein, E. Torng, and J. Wein. Optimal time-critical scheduling via resource augmentation. Algorithmica, 32(2):163--200, 2002.
 
35
Prabhakar Raghavan. A statistical adversary for online algorithms. In Online Algorithms, volume 53 of DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci., pages 79--83. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1991.
 
36
R. Ravi and Amitabh Sinha. Hedging uncertainty: Approximation algorithms for stochastic optimization problems. In Proceedings of the 10th Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference (IPCO), pages 101--115, 2004.
 
37
 
38
Daniel J. Rosenkrantz, Richard E. Stearns, and Philip M. Lewis, II. An analysis of several heuristics for the traveling salesman problem. SIAM J. Comput., 6(3):563--581, 1977.
39
40
41
 
42
Alexander Souza and Angelika Steger. The expected competitive ratio for weighted completion time scheduling. Theory Comput. Syst., 39(1):121--136, 2006.
 
43
 
44
Collaborative Colleagues:
Naveen Garg: colleagues
Anupam Gupta: colleagues
Stefano Leonardi: colleagues
Piotr Sankowski: colleagues