skip to main content
10.1145/1349822.1349860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction

Published: 12 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Robots are becoming increasingly integrated into the workplace, impacting organizational structures and processes, and affecting products and services created by these organizations. While robots promise significant benefits to organizations, their introduction poses a variety of design challenges. In this paper, we use ethnographic data collected at a hospital using an autonomous delivery robot to examine how organizational factors affect the way its members respond to robots and the changes engendered by their use. Our analysis uncovered dramatic differences between the medical and post-partum units in how people integrated the robot into their workflow and their perceptions of and interactions with it. Different patient profiles in these units led to differences in workflow, goals, social dynamics, and the use of the physical environment. In medical units, low tolerance for interruptions, a discrepancy between the perceived cost and benefits of using the robot, and breakdowns due to high traffic and clutter in the robot's path caused the robot to have a negative impact on the workflow and staff resistance. On the contrary, post-partum units integrated the robot into their workflow and social context. Based on our findings, we provide design guidelines for the development of robots for organizations.

References

[1]
Barley, S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1): 78--108, 1986.
[2]
Bourdieu, P. Outline for a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
[3]
Edmondson, A. C. and McManus, S. E. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32 (4): 1155--79, 2007.
[4]
Ehn, P. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.
[5]
Ehrlich, S. F. Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communication systems. In Proc. of CHI'87, 1987, 323--9.
[6]
Forlizzi, J. and Disalvo, C. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In Proc. of HRI'06, 258--65, 2006.
[7]
Forlizzi, J. How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In Proc. HRI'07, 129--36, 2007.
[8]
Friedman, B, and Kahn, P. H., and Borning, A. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington, Dept. of Computer Science & Eng. Technical Report, 02-12-01, 2002.
[9]
Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory. University of California Press, 1979.
[10]
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine DeGruyter, 1967.
[11]
Greenbaum, J. M. and Kyng, M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum: 1991.
[12]
Grudin, J. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proc. of CSCW'88, 1988, 85--93.
[13]
Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Comm. of the ACM, 37(1): 92--105, 1994.
[14]
Malone, T. W. Designing organizational interfaces. In Proc. of CHI'85, 1985, 66--71.
[15]
Ollman, B. Alienation: Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Cambridge University Press, 1971.
[16]
Orlikowski, W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404--28, 2000.
[17]
Orlikowski, W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1): 63--96, 1996.
[18]
Orlikowski, W. J. Learning from Notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. In Proc. of CSCW'92, 1992, 362--9.
[19]
Shah, S. K. and Corley, K. G. Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (8): 1821--35, 2006.
[20]
Siino, R. M. and Hinds, P. J. Making sense of new technology as a lead-in to structuring: The case of an autonomous mobile robot. Academy of Mgmt. Best Paper Proc., OCIS E1--E6, 2004.
[21]
Siino, R. M. and Hinds, P. J. Robots, gender & sensemaking: Sex segregation's impact on workers' making sense of a mobile autonomous robot. In Proc. of ICRA'05, 2005, 2773--78.
[22]
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, 1990.
[23]
Suchman, L. A. Office Procedure as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design. ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 4 (1): 320--8, 1983.
[24]
Suddaby, R. From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 633--42, 2006.
[25]
Sung, J-Y., Guo, L., Grinter, R. E., and Christensen, H. I. My Roomba is Rambo: Intimate home appliances. In Proc. of UbiComp'07, 2007.
[26]
Weick, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, 1979.
[27]
Weick, K. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 385--90, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Staging, Accommodating or Caring: Reviewing the Human Labor Involved in Shaping Robots into AgentsProceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3721488.3721738(1650-1654)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2025)Minding the Stop-gap: Attending to the "Temporary," Unplanned, and Added Labor of Human-Robot Collaboration in ContextProceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3721488.3721497(34-44)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2025)What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definitionBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2025.2462268(1-19)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
March 2008
402 pages
ISBN:9781605580173
DOI:10.1145/1349822
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 March 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomous robots
  2. ethnography
  3. groupware
  4. organizational interfaces
  5. organizational technology
  6. robots in organizations

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '08
HRI '08: International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
March 12 - 15, 2008
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)357
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Staging, Accommodating or Caring: Reviewing the Human Labor Involved in Shaping Robots into AgentsProceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3721488.3721738(1650-1654)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2025)Minding the Stop-gap: Attending to the "Temporary," Unplanned, and Added Labor of Human-Robot Collaboration in ContextProceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3721488.3721497(34-44)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2025)What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definitionBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2025.2462268(1-19)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
  • (2025)From caged robots to high-fives in robotics: Exploring the paradigm shift from human–robot interaction to human–robot teaming in human–machine interfacesJournal of Manufacturing Systems10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.10.01578(1-25)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2025)Teaming up With Robots: Analysing Potential and Challenges with Healthcare Workers and Defining TeamworkComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100136(100136)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2025)Comparing obedience and efficiency in tedious task performance under human and humanoid robot supervisionCognition, Technology & Work10.1007/s10111-024-00787-1Online publication date: 6-Jan-2025
  • (2025)Leader-Follower Formation of a Car-Like Robot Using ROS and Trajectory TrackingSocial Robotics10.1007/978-981-96-1151-5_36(355-365)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Robotics and Automation in Hospitality ServicesCutting-Edge Technologies for Business Sectors10.4018/979-8-3693-9586-8.ch013(367-400)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The Role of Name, Origin, and Voice Accent in a Robot’s Ethnic IdentitySensors10.3390/s2419642124:19(6421)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Planning Socially Expressive Mobile Robot TrajectoriesSensors10.3390/s2411353324:11(3533)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media