Using a robot proxy to create common ground in exploration tasks

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a user study of a new collaborative communication method between a user and remotely-located robot performing an exploration task. In the studied scenario, our user possesses scientific expertise but not necessarily detailed knowledge of the robot's capabilities, resulting in very little common ground

between the user and robot. Because the robot is not available during mission planning, we introduce a robot proxy to build common ground with the user. Our robot proxy has the ability to provide feedback to the user about the user's plans before the plans are executed. Our study demonstrated that the use of the robot proxy resulted in

improved performance and efficiency on an exploration task, more accurate mental models of the robot's capabilities, a stronger perception of effectiveness at the task, and stronger feelings of collaboration with the robotic system.

References

1. {1} S. E. Brennan and E. A. Hulteen. Interaction and feedback in a spoken language system: A theoretical framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 8:143--151, 1995.
2. {2} J. L. Burke, R. L. Murphy, M. D. Coovert, and D. L. Riddle. Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1--2):85--116, 2004.
3. {3} H. Clark and C. Marshall. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, and I. A. Sag, editors, Elements of discourse understanding, pages 10--63. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
4. {4} H. Clark and D. Wilkes-Gibbs. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1):1--39, 1986.
5. {5} H. H. Clark. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
6. {6} H. H. Clark and S. E. Brennan. Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, editors, Perspectives on socially shared cognition, pages 127--149. APA, 1991.
7. {7} J. L. Drury, L. Riek, and N. Rackliffe. A decomposition of UAV-related situation awareness. In Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 89--94, March 2006.
8. {8} J. L. Drury, J. Scholtz, and H. A. Yanco. Awareness in human-robot interactions. In International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2003, volume 1, pages 912--918, October 2003.
9. {9} M. R. Endsley. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In M. R. Endsley and D. J. Garland, editors, Situation Awareness: Analysis and Measurement, chapter 1, pages 1--32. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
10. E. Falcone, R. Gockley, E. Porter, and I. Nourbakhsh. The Personal Rover Project: The comprehensive design of a domestic personal robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42:245--258, 2003.
11. P. J. Hinds, T. L. Roberts, and H. Jones. Whose job is it anyway? A study of human--robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, (1--2):151--181, 2004.
12. H. Jones and P. Hinds. Extreme work teams: Using SWAT teams as a model for coordinating distributed robots. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, pages 372--380, November 2002.
13. S. Kiesler. Fostering common ground in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO--MAN), pages 729--734, 2005.
14. R. M. Krauss and S. R. Fussell. Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. In E. T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski, editors, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, pages 655--701. Guilford Press, 1996.
15. S. Li, B. Wrede, and G. Sagerer. A computational model of multi-modal grounding. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialog, in conjunction with COLING/ACL 2006, pages 153--160. ACL Press, 2006.
16. T. Paek and E. Horvitz. Uncertainty, utility, and misunderstanding: A decision-theoretic perspective on grounding in conversational systems. In Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium, November 5-7, North Falmouth, Massachusetts, pages 85--92, 1999.
17. K. Severinson-Eklundh, H. Huttenrauch, and A. Green. Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special Issue on Socially Interactive Robots, 42(3--4), 2003.
18. K. Stubbs, P. Hinds, and D. Wettergreen. Challenges to grounding in human-robot interaction: Sources of errors and miscommunications in remote exploration robotics. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2006.
19. K. Stubbs, P. Hinds, and D. Wettergreen. Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Interacting with Autonomy, 22(2):42--50, March--April 2007.
20. C. Torrey, A. Powers, M. Marge, S. R. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations. In Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 126--133. ACM, March 2006.
21. H. A. Yanco, J. L. Drury, and J. Scholtz. Beyond usability evaluation: Analysis of human--robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1--2):117--149, 2004.

Index Terms

• Computer systems organization

  • Embedded and cyber-physical systems

    • Robotics

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Control methods

      • Robotic planning

    • Planning and scheduling

      • Robotic planning

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods