Can health care benefit from modeling and simulation methods in the same way as business and manufacturing has?

ABSTRACT

It has been increasingly recognized that the application of simulation methods can be instrumental in addressing the multi-faceted challenges health care is facing at present and more importantly in the future. But the application of these methods seems not to be as widespread as in other sectors, where such methods when used as part of their core operation, reap significant benefits. This paper examines the potential use of modeling and simulation in health care, drawing the parallels and marking the mismatches from the business and manufacturing world. Methods from the latter sectors will be reviewed with the intention to assess their potential usefulness to healthcare. To focus this discussion, we propose and discuss seven axes of differentiation: patient fear of death; medical practitioners (for example approach to healing, investigation by experimentation and finance); healthcare support staff; health care managers; political influence and control; 'society's view'; and utopia.

References

1. Brailsford S and B Schmidt. 2002. Towards incorporating human behaviour in models of health care systems: An approach using discrete event simulation. European Journal of Operational Research 150: 19--31.
2. Brailsford S. C., J. Sykes, and P. R. Harper. 2006. Incorporating human behavior in healthcare simulation models. In Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, 466--472. Monterey, CA.
3. Connell, N. A. D. 2001. Evaluating Soft OR: some reflections on an "unsuccessful" implementation using an SSM-based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52: 150--160.
4. Eldabi, T. and T. Young. 2007. Towards a framework for healthcare simulation. To appear in Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. S. G. Henderson, B. Biller, M-H Hsieh, J. Shortle, J. D. Tew, and R. R. Barton, Washington DC, USA.
5. Eldabi, T., R. J. Paul, and T. Young. 2007. Simulation modelling in healthcare: reviewing legacies and investigating futures. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 262--270.
6. Elsevier. 2007. Scopus in Detail: Facts and Figures. Web resource <http://info.scopus.com/detail/facts> {accessed July 2, 2007}.
7. Lehaney, B. and R. J. Paul. 1996. The use of soft systems methodology in the development of a simulation of outpatient services. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47: 864--870.
8. Littlejohns, P., J. C. Wyatt, and L. Garvican. 2003. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. British Medical Journal 326: 860 -- 863.
9. Mumford, E. 1983. Designing participatively: A participative approach to computer systems design. Manchester Business School. UK.
10. Mumford, E. 2003. Re-designing Human Systems, Idea Group. Hershey, PA.
11. Paul, R. J. and J. Kuljis. 2007. Healthcare distinctiveness and singularities. Presented at the Fifth IMS International Conference on Quantitative Modelling in the Management of Healthcare, 2--4 April 2007. The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications.
12. RIGHT Consortium. 2007. Methodology for RIGHT Literature Review. Technical Report, Department of IS and Computing, Brunel University.
13. Young, T, 2005. An Agenda for Healthcare and Information Simulation, Health Care Management Science 8: 189--196.
14. Young, T., S. Brailsford, C. Connell, R. Davies, P. Harper and J. H. Klein. 2004. Using Industrial Processes to Improve Patient Care. British Medical Journal 328: 162--164.