The effects of pair-programming on individual programming skill

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have reported significant educational benefits from the use of pair-programming, in which two students program together at the same computer. Here, we report the results of a controlled study designed to measure the effects of pair-programming on the development of individual programming ability. Our findings indicate significant improvements in individual programming skill for students with lower SAT scores. Additionally, we found that all students are more likely to complete the course successfully when using pair-programming.

REFERENCES

• 1: David J. Barnes , Michael Kolling, Objects First With Java: A Practical Introduction Using BlueJ (3rd Edition), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006
• 2: Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 3: S. Edwards. Using test-driven development in the classroom: Providing students with automatic concrete feedback on performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications 2003.
• 4: Brian Hanks , Charlie McDowell , David Draper , Milovan Krnjajic, Program quality with pair programming in CS1, Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 28-30, 2004, Leeds, United Kingdom
• 5: Charlie McDowell , Brian Hanks , Linda Werner, Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom, Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 30-July 02, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece
• 6: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather Bullock , Julian Fernald, The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 27-March 03, 2002, Cincinnati, Kentucky
• 7: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather E. Bullock , Julian Fernald, The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
• 8: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather E. Bullock , Julian Fernald, Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality, Communications of the ACM, v.49 n.8, p.90-95, August 2006 [doi>10.1145/1145287.1145293]
• 9: Emilia Mendes , Lubna Al-Fakhri , Andrew Luxton-Reilly, A replicated experiment of pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course, Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 26-28, 2006, Bologna, Italy
• 10: Emilia Mendes , Lubna Basil Al-Fakhri , Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Investigating pair-programming in a 2^nd-year software development and design computer science course, Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 27-29, 2005, Caparica, Portugal
• 11: Nachiappan Nagappan , Laurie Williams , Miriam Ferzli , Eric Wiebe , Kai Yang , Carol Miller , Suzanne Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.35 n.1, January 2003
• 12: N. Nagappan, L. A. Williams, E. Wiebe, C. Miller, S. Balik, M. Ferzli, and J. Petlick. Pair learning: With an eye toward future success. In XP/Agile Universe, pages 185--198, 2003.
• 13: D. Schneider and N. Dorans. Concordance between SAT I and ACT scores for individual students, 1999.
• 14: Linda L. Werner , Brian Hanks , Charlie McDowell, Pair-programming helps female computer science students, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), v.4 n.1, p.4-es, March 2004 [doi>10.1145/1060071.1060075]
• 15: L. Williams. But, isn?t that cheating? In 29th ASEE/IEEE Fronteers in Education Conference, 1999.
• 16: L. Williams, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, M. Ferzli, and C. Miller. In support of pair programming in the introductory computer science course. Computer Science Education, 12(3):197?212, 2002.
• 17: L. Williams, K. Yang, E. Wiebe, M. Ferzli, and C. Miller. Pair programming in an introductory computer science course: Initial results and recommendations. In OOPSLA Educator?s Symposium, 2002.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.3 Coding Tools and Techniques

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
CS1, collaboration, pair-programming, peer-instruction