ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Semantic validation for XML updates
Full text PdfPdf (146 KB)
Source
Conference On Ubiquitous Information Management And Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Ubiquitous information management and communication table of contents
Suwon, Korea
SESSION: Web and XML table of contents
Pages 151-156  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-993-7
Authors
Wei Ni  National University of Singapore
Tok Wang Ling  National University of Singapore
Sponsors
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 97,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1352793.1352825
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For data centric XML data, updates bring the problem of validation that the updated data must conform to both structural and semantic constraints according to XML schemas. Most existing XML validation works today are concentrated on structural constraints with respect to DTD and XML. Schema (XSD). However, because DTD/XSD schema is too limited to express complex data semantics, they cannot be used to validate semantic constraints in XML. Meanwhile, there are few works concentrated on how to validate semantic constraints. In this paper, we investigate ORA-SS [16], a rich semantic data model, for XML data. We derive a set of important semantic constraints with respect to the data semantics in ORA-SS model including nary relationship types (n≥2), relationship attributes, object IDs and ID references, and semantic dependencies, etc, which cannot be captured by DTD/XSD schema. Then, we discuss how to validate these semantic constraints in XML updates with the help of ORASS.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Apparao, V. and Byrne, S. Document object model (DOM) level 1 specification. W3C Recommendation, 1998.
2
 
3
 
4
Bouchou, B., Alves, M. H. F., Laurent, D., and Duarte, D. Extending tree automata to model XML validation under element and attribute constraints. ICEIS (1), 2003
 
5
6
7
 
8
Davidson, S., Fan, W., Hara, C. and Qin, J. Propagating XML Constraints to Relations The 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 543--554, 2003.
9
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Jelliffe, R. The Schematron: An XML Validation Language using Patterns in Trees. www.ascc.net/xml/resource/schematron/
14
 
15
Kwong, A. and Gertz, M. Structural Constraints for XML. University of California Technical Report CSE-2002-24, June, 2002
 
16
17
 
18
Mendling, J. and Nüttgens, M. EPC markup language (EPML): an XML-based interchange format for event-driven process chains. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 2006, Springer.
 
19
Nentwich, C. CLiX - A Validation Rule Language for XML. http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/24/
20
 
21
Extensible Markup Language (XML):http://www.w3.org/XML/
 
22
RELAX NG home page: http://relaxng.org/#introduction
 
23
XML Path Language (XPath): http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath
 
24
XML Schema: http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema
 
25
XQuery Update Facility: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xqupdate-20060711/