Wedge: clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations

ABSTRACT

To overcome display limitations of small-screen devices, researchers have proposed techniques that point users to objects located off-screen. Arrow-based techniques such as City Lights convey only direction. Halo conveys direction and distance, but is susceptible to clutter resulting from overlapping halos. We present Wedge, a visualization technique that conveys direction and distance, yet avoids overlap and clutter. Wedge represents each off-screen location using an acute isosceles triangle: the tip coincides with the off-screen locations, and the two corners are located on-screen. A wedge conveys location awareness primarily by means of its two legs pointing towards the target. Wedges avoid overlap programmatically by repelling each other, causing them to rotate until overlap is resolved. As a result, wedges can be applied to numbers and configurations of targets that would lead to clutter if visualized using halos. We report on a user study comparing Wedge and Halo for three off-screen tasks. Participants were significantly more accurate when using Wedge than when using Halo.

REFERENCES

• 1: Patrick Baudisch , Ruth Rosenholtz, Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642695]
• 2: Patrick Baudisch , Nathaniel Good , Victoria Bellotti , Pamela Schraedley, Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503423]
• 3: Bederson, B. B., Hollan, J. D., Perlin, K., Meyer, J., Bacon, D., and Furnas, G. (1996). Pad++: A zoomable graphical sketchpad for exploring alternate interface physics, Visual Languages and Computation, 7, 3--31.
• 4: Stefano Burigat , Luca Chittaro , Silvia Gabrielli, Visualizing locations of off-screen objects on mobile devices: a comparative evaluation of three approaches, Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, September 12-15, 2006, Helsinki, Finland [doi>10.1145/1152215.1152266]
• 5: M. S. T. Carpendale , Catherine Montagnese, A framework for unifying presentation space, Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, November 11-14, 2001, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/502348.502358]
• 6: Elder, J. and Zucker, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33(7), 981--991.
• 7: Sean G. Gustafson , Pourang P. Irani, Comparing visualizations for tracking off-screen moving targets, CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/1240866.1241014]
• 8: Guttman, S. E., and Kellman, P. J. (2002). Do spatial factors influence the microgenesis of illusory contours? Journal of Vision, 2, 355a.
• 9: Kasper Hornbæk , Erik Frøkjær, Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.293-300, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365118]
• 10: Pourang Irani , Carl Gutwin , Xing Dong Yang, Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124818]
• 11: Heidi Lam , Patrick Baudisch, Summary thumbnails: readable overviews for small screen web browsers, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055066]
• 12: Polle T. Zellweger , Jock D. Mackinlay , Lance Good , Mark Stefik , Patrick Baudisch, City lights: contextual views in minimal space, CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/765891.766022]
• 13: Marsh, T. and Wright, P. (2000) Using cinematography conventions to inform guidelines for the design and evaluation of virtual off-screen space. Proc. AAAI 2000 Spring Symp. Ser. Smart Graphics, 123--127.
• 14: Murray, R., Sekuler, A., and Bennett, P. (2001). Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin, 8, 713--720.
• 15: Miguel A. Nacenta , Samer Sallam , Bernard Champoux , Sriram Subramanian , Carl Gutwin, Perspective cursor: perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124817]
• 16: Dmitry Nekrasovski , Adam Bodnar , Joanna McGrenere , François Guimbretière , Tamara Munzner, An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124775]
• 17: Michael Rohs , Georg Essl, Which one is better?: information navigation techniques for spatially aware handheld displays, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, November 02-04, 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1180995.1181016]
• 18: Manojit Sarkar , Marc H. Brown, Graphical fisheye views of graphs, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.83-91, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142763]
• 19: Sekuler, A. and Murray, R. (2001). Amodal completion: A case studying grouping. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.), From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision, New York: Elsevier, 265--293.
• 20: Sekuler, A. and Palmer, S. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95--111.
• 21: Sekuler, A., Palmer, S., and Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260--267.
• 22: Shore, D. and Enns, T. (1997). Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 980--998.
• 23: Amy Skopik , Carl Gutwin, Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055079]
• 24: Colin Ware , Marlon Lewis, The DragMag image magnifier, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.407-408, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223749]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Graphical user interfaces (GUI)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
maps, off-screen, peripheral awareness, small screens, spatial cognition, visualization