skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357269acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a new technique called 'Tilt Menu' for better extending selection capabilities of pen-based interfaces. The Tilt Menu is implemented by using 3D orientation information of pen devices while performing selection tasks. The Tilt Menu has the potential to aid traditional one-handed techniques as it simultaneously generates the secondary input (e.g., a command or parameter selection) while drawing/interacting with a pen tip without having to use the second hand or another device. We conduct two experiments to explore the performance of the Tilt Menu. In the first experiment, we analyze the effect of parameters of the Tilt Menu, such as the menu size and orientation of the item, on its usability. Results of the first experiment suggest some design guidelines for the Tilt Menu. In the second experiment, the Tilt Menu is compared to two types of techniques while performing connect-the-dot tasks using freeform drawing mechanism. Results of the second experiment show that the Tilt Menu perform better in comparison to the Tool Palette, and is as good as the Toolglass.

References

  1. Adobe Illustrator, http://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Accot, J., Zhai, S., Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for Trajectory-Based HCI Tasks. In Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 295--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Arvo, J., Novins, K., Fluid Sketches: Continuous Recognition and Morphing of Simple Hand-Drawn Shapes. In Proc. UIST 2000, ACM Press (2000), 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G., and Fitzmaurice, G., The Rockin'Mouse: integral 3D manipulation on a plane. In Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 311--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Balakrishnan, R., Hinckley, K., The role of kinesthetic reference frames in two-handed input performance. In Proc. UIST 1999, ACM Press (1999), 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., Derose, T. D., Toolglass and magic lenses: The see-through interface. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1993, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., Shneiderman, B., An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus. In Proc. of CHI 1988, ACM Press (1988), 95--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fitzmaurice, G., Khan, A., Pieké, R., Buxton, W., Kurtenbach, G., Tracking menus. In Proc UIST 2003, ACM Press (2003), 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Franke, K., The influence of physical and biomechanical processes on the ink trace methodological foundations for the forensic analysis of signatures, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman T, Hinckley, K. Baudisch, P., Agrawala, M., Balakrishnan, R., Hover widgets: Using the tracking state to extend the capabilities of pen-operated devices. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 861--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Guimbretière, F., Winograd, T. FlowMenu: Combining command, text, and parameter entry. In Proc UIST 2000, ACM Press (2000). 213--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Guimbretière, F., Martin, A., Winograd, T., Benefits of merging command selection and direct manipulation. ACM TOCHI, 2005, 12 (3): 460--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hinckley, K., Guimbretiere, F., Agrawala, M., Apitz, G., Chen, N., Phrasing techniques for multi-stroke selection gestures. GI, 147--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jacob, R.J.K., Deligiannidis, L., Morrison, S., A Software Model and Specification Language for Non-WIMP User Interfaces. ACM TOCHI, 1999, 6(1): 1--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jagadeesh Babu V., Prashanth L., Raghunath Sharma R., Prabhakara Rao G.V., Bharath A., HMM-based Online Handwriting Recognition System for Telugu Symbols, In Proc. ICDAR 2007, 23--26 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kabbash, P., Buxton, W., Sellen, A., Two-handed input in a compound task. In Proc. CHI 1994, ACM Press (1994), 417--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kurtenbach, G. Buxton, W., The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 482--487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of "marking menus". Human Computer Interaction, 1993. 8(1): 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Li, J., Zhang, X., Ao X., Dai G., Sketch recognition with continuous feedback based on incremental intention extraction, In Proc IUI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 145--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Li, Y., Hinckley, K., Guan Z., Landay, J.A., Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen based user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 461--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Odell, D., Davis, R., Smith, A., Wright, P. K., Toolglasses, Marking Menus, and Hotkeys: A Comparison of One and Two-Handed Command Selection Techniques, In Proc. GI 2004, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Partridge, K., Chatterjee, S., Want, R., TiltType: Accelerometer-supported text entry for very small devices, In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 201--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pook, S., Lecolinet, E., Vaysseix, G., and Barillot, E., Control menu: Execution and control in a single interactor. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 263--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Solidworks, http://www.solidworks.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramos, G., Boulos, M., Balakrishnan, R. Pressure Widgets. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 487--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R. Zliding: fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2005), 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R. Pressure Marks. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1375--1384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Saund, E., Lank, E., Stylus input and editing without prior selection of mode. In Proc. UIST 2003, ACM Press (2003), 213--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tandler, P., Prante, T., Using Incremental Gesture Recognition to Provide Immediate Feedback while Drawing Pen Gestures. In Proc. UIST 2001, ACM Press (2001), 18--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tian, F., Ao, X., Wang, H., Setlur, V., Dai G., The Tilt Cursor: Enhancing Stimulus-Response Compatibility Based on 3D Orientation Cue of Pen Devices. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 303--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R. TiltText: Using Tilt. for Text Input to Mobile Phones. In Proc. UIST 2003. ACM Press (2003), 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhao, S., Agrawala, M., Hinckley, K., Zone and Polygon Menus: Using Relative Position to Increase the Breadth of Multi-Stroke Marking. Menus, In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1077--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader