skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357337acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SuperBreak: using interactivity to enhance ergonomic typing breaks

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Repetitive strain injuries and ergonomics concerns have become increasingly significant health issues as a growing number of individuals frequently use computers for long periods of time. Currently, limited software mechanisms exist for managing ergonomics; the most well-known are "break-reminder" packages that schedule and recommend typing breaks. Yet despite the proven benefits of taking breaks, such packages are rarely adopted due to the over-head of introducing periodic interruptions into a user's workflow. In this paper, we describe SuperBreak, a break-reminder package that provides hands-free interactions during breaks, with the goal of encouraging users to take more breaks and enhancing the benefits of those breaks. In a field study of 26 knowledge workers, 85% preferred SuperBreak over a traditional break-reminder system, and on average participants took a higher percentage of the interactive breaks suggested to them. Our results highlight the value of interactivity for improving the adoption and retention of ergonomic break practices.

References

  1. Balci, R., Aghazadeh, F. 2004. Effects of exercise breaks on performance, muscular load, and perceived discomfort in data entry and cognitive tasks. Comput. Ind Eng. 46, 3 (Jun. 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barredo, R. Mahon, K. The Effects of Exercise and Rest Breaks on Musculoskeletal Discomfort during Computer Tasks: An Evidence Based Perspective, Journal of Physical Therapy Science, Vol. 19, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bianchi-Berthouze, N. Kim,W., Darshak,P. Does Body Movement Engage You More in Digital Game Play? And Why? Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Springer, LNCS 4738, 102--113 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breazeal C, Wang A, Picard R. Experiments with a Robotic Computer: Body, Affect, and Cognition Interactions. 2nd Intl Conf on Human-Robot Interaction, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J. A. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. Proc CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dunne, L.E., Walsh, P., Smyth, B., Caulfield, B. Design and Evaluation of a Wearable Optical Sensor for Monitoring Seated Spinal Posture. Proc 10th Intl Symp on Wearable Computers, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hedge, A., Evans, S. J. (2001): Ergonomic Management Software and Work Performance: An Evaluative Study. Cornell University Technical Report/RP 2501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Henning, R.A., Jacques, P., Kissel, G.V., Sullivan, A.B., Alteras-Webb, S.M. Frequent short rest breaks from computer work: effects on productivity and well-being at two field sites. Ergonomics 40(1) (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Horvitz, E., Apacible, J., Koch, P. BusyBody: Creating and Fielding Personalized Models of the Cost of Interruption. Proc CSCW 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Horvitz, E., Apacible, J. Learning and Reasoning about Interruption, Proc. ICMI 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lin, J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub H.B. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. Proc UbiComp 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lo, J-L., Lin, T-Y., Chu, H-h., Chou, H-C., Chen, J-h., Hsu, J., Huang, P. Playful Tray: Adopting Ubicomp and Persuasive Techniques into Play-Based Occupational Therapy for Reducing Poor Eating Behavior in Young Children. Proc UbiComp 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. McLean, L., Tingley, M., Scott, R.N., and Rickards, J. Computer terminal work and the benefits of micro-breaks. Applied Ergonomics 32(3) (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Monsey, M., Ioffe, I., Beatini, A., Lukey, B., Santiago, A., James A.B. Increasing compliance with stretch breaks in computer users through reminder software. Work; 2003, Vol. 21.2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. National Academy of Science. Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace: Low Back and Upper Extremities. National Academy Press (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. OpenCV: http://intel.com/technology/computing/opencvGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. OSHA Ergonomic Solutions: Computer Workstations eTool, Work Process and Recognition: http://osha.gov/SLTC/etools/computerworkstations/workprocess.html, viewed 9/12/2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pascarelli, E. Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain Injury, Wiley & Sons, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Saltzman, A. Computer user perception of the effectiveness of exercise mini-breaks, Proc ErgoCon, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Slijper, H., Richter, J., Smeets, J., Frens, M. The effects of pause software on the temporal characteristics of computer use. Ergonomics. 50(2):178--191, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. SuperBreak: using interactivity to enhance ergonomic typing breaks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader