skip to main content
10.5555/1357910.1358088acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Agents with personality: human operator assistants

Published: 16 July 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The Future Combat Systems (FCS) concept for the Department of Defense (DoD) has made unmanned systems as a prime focus. Currently, an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) requires a team of several individuals to effectively operate the UAV. The FCS concept will change this to where a single operator is in control of multiple UAVs. The increase in responsibility on the operator brings an increase in cognitive load leading to the need for automated assistants. This paper introduces a novel concept for human operator assistance based on adding personality traits to software agents. It has been shown that operator interfaces that provide positive feedback and decision support in a personable fashion lead to better performance than systems that provide only factual information. This work shows how personality at the UAV level and at the human interface level can be combined to produce an interactive system to control the actions of multiple UAVs, managing them without the need for intricate plans in place for the UAVs to follow. This paper shows the origins of the work, the architecture and concept, and mock-up depictions of the control interface with descriptions of how the operator will be able to interact with the UAVs.

References

[1]
Babaoglu O., Meling H., and Montresor A. (2002), "Anthill: A Framework for the Development of Agent-Based Peer-to-Peer Systems," Proc. of the 22th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
[2]
Bullnheimer B., Hartl R. F., and Strauss C. (1999), An Improved Ant System Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem. Annals of Operations Research, vol 89, pp 319--328.
[3]
Dasgupta P. (2003), "Improving Peer-to-Peer Resource Discovery Using Mobile Agent Based Referrals," Proceedings of the 2nd AAMAS Workshop on Agent Enabled Peer-to-Peer Computing, Melbourne, Australia, pp 41--54.
[4]
Decker K., and Sycara K. (1997), "Intelligent Adaptive Information Agents," Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 9, pp 239--260.
[5]
Di Caro G. and Dorigo M. (1998), "AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol 9, pp 317--365.
[6]
Doerner K., Hartl R., and Reimann M. (2004), Are COMPETants More Competent for Problem Solving? - The Case of a Multiple Objective Transportation Problem; Department of Production and Operations Management, Institute for Management Science, University of Vienna, http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/am/Download/report50.pdf
[7]
Dorigo M. and Di Caro G. (1999), The Ant Colony Optimization Meta-Heuristic. In D. Corne, M. Dorigo, and F. Glover, editors, New Ideas in Optimization. McGraw-Hill. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/dorigo99ant.html.
[8]
Dorigo M. and Gambardella L. M. (1997) Ant Colony System: A Cooperative Learning Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol 1, no 1, pp 53--66.
[9]
Dorigo M., Maniezzo V., and Colorni A. (1996), "The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, vol 26, no 2, pp 29--41. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/dorigo96ant.html
[10]
Endsley, M. R., and Garland, D. J. (2000). Pilot Situational Awareness in General Aviation. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[11]
Gallimore, J. J. and Prabhala, S. (2006) "Creating Collaborative Agents with Personality for Supervisory Control of Multiple UCAVs," Human Factors and Medicine Panel Symposium on Human Factors of Uninhabited Military Vehicles as Force Multipliers, Biarritz, France.
[12]
Giampapa J., Paoluc M., and Sycara K. (2000), "Agent Interoperation Across Multi Agent System Boundaries," Proceedings of Agents 2000, Barcelona, Spain, June 3--7.
[13]
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 59, no 6, pp 1216--1229.
[14]
Gordon D. (2004), "Collective Intelligence in Social Insects," from http://ai-depot.com/Essay/SocialInsects.html.
[15]
Heilman, K. M. 1995. Attention Asymmetries. In R. J. Davidson and K. Hug Dahl (Eds), Brain Asymmetry, 217--234. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[16]
Hoc, J. (2001). Towards a Cognitive Approach to Human-Machine Cooperation in Dynamic Situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. vol 54, pp 509--540.
[17]
Jøsang A. (2002), "The Consensus Operator for Combining Beliefs," Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol 141(1--2), pp 157--170. http://sky.fit.qut.edu.au/~josang/papers/Jos2002-AIJ.pdf.
[18]
Karim, S. and Heinze, C. (2005). Experiences with the design and implementation of an agent-based autonomous UAV controller. In Proceedings of The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multiagent Systems, July 25--29, 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp 19--26.
[19]
Lee, K. W., and Nass, C. (2003). Designing Social Presence of Social Actors in Human Computer Interaction. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp 289--296.
[20]
Lin, F., Kao C., and Hsu C. (1993), "Applying Genetic Approach to Simulated Annealing in solving some NP hard problems," IEEE Transactions on System Man Cybernetics, vol 23.
[21]
Maniezzo V. and Colorni A. (1998), "The Ant System Applied To The Quadratic Assignment Problem," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol 11, no 5, pp 769--778.
[22]
Montgomery J. and Randall M. (2002), "Anti-Pheromone as a Tool for Better Exploration of Search Space, "Proceedings of ANTS 2002.
[23]
Mooij, M., and Corker, K. (2002). Supervisory Control Paradigm: Limitations in Applicability to Advanced Air Traffic Management Systems. Proceedings of IEEE Digital Avionics System Conference. vol 1, pp IC3.1--IC3.8
[24]
Mosier, K. L. and Skitka, L. J. (1996). Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other? In M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. pp 201--220, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[25]
Petrov P. and Stoyen A. (2000), "An Intelligent-Agent Based Decision Support System for a Complex Command and Control Application," Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, Tokyo, Japan.
[26]
Prabhala, S., and Gallimore J. J. (2005a). Perceptions of Personality in Computer Agents: Effects of Culture and Gender. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL, pp 716--720.
[27]
Prabhala, S., and Gallimore, J. J. (2005). Developing Computer Agents with Personalities. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference in Human-Computer Interaction. Las Vegas, NV, CD-ROM Publication.
[28]
Price, I. (2005). Evolving self-organized behavior for homogeneous and heterogeneous UAV or UCAV swarms. Master Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, AFIT/GCS/ENG/06-11.
[29]
Reimann M., Doerner K., Hartl R. (2002); Insertion based Ants for Vehicle Routing Problems with Backhauls and Time Windows; Department of Production and Operations Management, Institute for Management Science, University of Vienna; Report No. 68.
[30]
Sarter, N. B., and Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control. Human Factors, vol 37, no 1, pp 5--19.
[31]
Schoonderwood R., Holland O., Bruten J., Rothkrantz L. (1996), "Ant-based load balancing in Telecommunication Networks," Adaptive Behavior, vol 5, pp 169--207.
[32]
Stützle T. and Hoos H. H. (2000), MAX MIN Ant System. Journal of Future Generation Computer Systems, 16:889--914. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/312713.html
[33]
Woodley, R. (2006). Ants on the AEDGE: Personality in software agents. Proceedings of the 25th Army Science Conference (ASC), November 27--30, 2006, Orlando, Florida, USA.
[34]
Weiss G. (ed.) (1998), "Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence," MIT Press, 1998.
  1. Agents with personality: human operator assistants

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SCSC '07: Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference
    July 2007
    1363 pages
    ISBN:1565553160

    Sponsors

    • SCS: Society for Modeling and Simulation International

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Society for Computer Simulation International

    San Diego, CA, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 July 2007

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. human-agent interface
    2. personality traits
    3. software agents

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SCSC07
    Sponsor:
    • SCS
    SCSC07: 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference
    July 16 - 19, 2007
    California, San Diego

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 318
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media