skip to main content
10.1145/1399504.1360657acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards passive 6D reflectance field displays

Published:01 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional flat screen displays present 2D images. 3D and 4D displays have been proposed making use of lenslet arrays to shape a fixed outgoing light field for horizontal or bidirectional parallax. In this article, we present different designs of multi-dimensional displays which passively react to the light of the environment behind. The prototypes physically implement a reflectance field and generate different light fields depending on the incident illumination, for example light falling through a window. We discretize the incident light field using an optical system, and modulate it with a 2D pattern, creating a flat display which is view and illumination-dependent. It is free from electronic components. For distant light and a fixed observer position, we demonstrate a passive optical configuration which directly renders a 4D reflectance field in the real-world illumination behind it. We further propose an optical setup that allows for projecting out different angular distributions depending on the incident light direction. Combining multiple of these devices we build a display that renders a 6D experience, where the incident 2D illumination influences the outgoing light field, both in the spatial and in the angular domain. Possible applications of this technology are time-dependent displays driven by sunlight, object virtualization and programmable light benders / ray blockers without moving parts.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a58-fuchs.mov

mov

53.8 MB

References

  1. Debevec, P., Hawkins, T., Tchou, C., Duiker, H.-P., Sarokin, W., and Sagar, M. 2000. Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 145--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fuchs, M., Blanz, V., Lensch, H. P. A., and Seidel, H.-P. 2007. Adaptive sampling of reflectance fields. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 26, 2 (June). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Georgiev, T., Zheng, K. C., Curless, B., Salesin, D., Nayar, S., and Intwala, C. 2006. Spatio-angular resolution trade-offs in integral photography. In Rendering Techniques 2006: Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gerrard, A., and Burch, J. M. 1975. Introduction to Matrix Methods in Optics. John Wiley & Sons, New York - Chichester - Brisbane.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Isaksen, A., McMillan, L., and Gortler, S. J. 2000. Dynamically reparameterized light fields. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Javidi, B., and Okano, F. (Ed.). 2001. Three-dimensional video and display: devices and systems. SPIE, Washington, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Koike, T., and Naemura, T. 2007. BRDF display. SIGGRAPH 2007 poster presentation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Levoy, M., Ng, R., Adams, A., Footer, M., and Horowitz, M. 2006. Light field microscopy. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 25, 3, 924--934. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lippmann, G. 1908. Epreuves reversibles donnant la sensation du relief. Journal of Physics 7, 821--825.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matusik, W., and Pfister, H. 2004. 3D TV: a scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 23, 3, 814--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Min, C., Wang, P., Jiao, X., Deng, Y., and Ming, H. 2007. Beam manipulating by metallic nano-optic lens containing nonlinear media. Opt. Express 15, 15, 9541--9546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nakajima, S., Nakamura, K., Masamune, K., Sakuma, I., and T., T. D. 2001. Three-dimensional medical imaging display with computer-generated integral photography. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 25, 235--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nayar, S. K., Belhumeur, P. N., and Boult, T. E. 2004. Lighting sensitive display. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 4, 963--979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ng, R., Levoy, M., Brédif, M., Duval, G., Horowitz, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2005. Light field photography with a hand-held plenoptic camera. Stanford University Computer Scienece Tech Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Scharstein, H., Krotz-Vogel, W., and Scharstein, D. 1996. Digital sundial. In US patent 5 590 093, German patent 4 431 817.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sun, Z., and Kim, H. K. 2004. Refractive transmission of light and beam shaping with metallic nano-optic lenses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Veeraraghavan, A., Raskar, R., Agrawal, A., Mohan, A., and Tumblin, J. 2007. Dappled photography: mask enhanced cameras for heterodyned light fields and coded aperture refocusing. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3, 69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ziegler, R., Bucheli, S., Ahrenberg, L., Magnor, M., and Gross, M. 2007. A bidirectional light field - hologram transform. In Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics), D. Cohen Or and P. Slavik, Eds., vol. 26, 435--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards passive 6D reflectance field displays

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGGRAPH '08: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers
        August 2008
        887 pages
        ISBN:9781450301121
        DOI:10.1145/1399504

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGGRAPH '08 Paper Acceptance Rate90of518submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGGRAPH '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader