skip to main content
10.1145/1362550.1362599acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Decisions and collaborative work: a different perspective

Published:28 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- The driving theme for this investigation has been to present a different perspective on decision making and the effect of decisions made on the collaboration involved in a complex work process. This work is influenced by the recent change in perception towards the conceptualization of decisions and their bearing on collaborative work. Instead of viewing decisions as just a mental act the change in perception is to view it as a device for managing and coordinating activities (Brown, 2005). This investigation endeavours to demonstrate how decisions made by people in a work process not only determines their individual actions but also supports and facilitates collaborative work. This is achieved by viewing decisions as abstract information resources that encourage appropriate distribution of information, distribution of cognitive tasks, and coordination between individuals and teams involved in the work process.

Research approach -- A series of ethnographically inspired studies carried out to study the work of airport staff (Fields, Amaldi et al., 2005; Selvaraj, 2006) at an European airport over a year has been instrumental in supporting the notion put forth in this paper. Data collection was performed by engaging in observation, note-taking, and semi-structured interviews with personnel in the control tower, etc. Observation sessions typically lasted between two and four hours. The field material consists of data from several sources, i.e. notes, audio recordings, photographs, and interview transcripts. Scenarios have been elicited from transcriptions of audio recordings of conversations taking place between people in the tower and those involved in the activities of the tower as well as from interviews conducted with personnel in the control tower. Apart from this, observation and notes from the fieldwork augment our understanding of these scenarios and help steer the ensuing discussions.

Findings/Design -- This paper is an initial step towards investigating the notion of decisions as mechanisms for organizing collaborative work The analysis of the complex work process of air traffic control reveals that decisions made by individuals and groups in the course of their work activities determine the coordination and integration of contextually appropriate actions and interactions necessary to accomplish tasks.

Take away message -- Rethink the notion of decision making; decisions play a significant role in organizing various aspects of collaborative work and are not just mental acts.

References

  1. Brown, B. (2005). Choice and Mobility: decision making on the move. Draft, presented at SASE panel on Mobile Geographies, 2005. Available as http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~barry/papers.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, A. W. (2000). Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 1, 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fields, E. R., Amaldi, P. and Tassi, A. (2005). Representing collaborative work: The airport as common information space. Cognition, Technology and Work, 7, 119--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hutchins, E., ed. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Roger, Y. and Ellis, J. (1994). Distributed Cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working. Journal of Information Technology, 9, 2, 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Schmidt, K. (1991). Riding a Tiger, or Computer Supported Cooperative Work. In Proceedings of the ECSCW'91, Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Amsterdam, 24--27 September, 1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Selvaraj, N. (2006). Collaborative decision making in complex safety critical systems: A common information space approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop HCT 2006: Human Centred Technologies Workshop (University of Sussex, Brighton, 11--12 Sep, 2006), 4--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wright, C. P., Fields, E. R. and Harrison, D. M. (2000). Analyzing Human-Computer Interaction as Distributed Cognition: The Resources Model. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Decisions and collaborative work: a different perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ECCE '07: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!
      August 2007
      334 pages
      ISBN:9781847998491
      DOI:10.1145/1362550

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader