ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A lifecycle approach to SOA governance
Full text PdfPdf (88 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: Enterprise information systems table of contents
Pages 1055-1061  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
Authors
T. G. J. Schepers  Deloitte
M. E. Iacob  University of Twente
P. A. T. Van Eck  University of Twente
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 128,   Downloads (12 Months): 472,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1363932
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Due to the distributed nature of Service-Oriented Architectures (SOA), maintaining control in a SOA environment becomes more difficult as services spread over different lines-of-business. The concept of SOA governance has emerged as a way to implement control mechanisms in a SOA. In this paper we identify a lifecycle based approach for executing SOA governance. This approach consists of defining a SOA strategy, aligning the organization, managing the service portfolio, controlling the service lifecycle, enforcing policies and managing service levels. By incorporating a maturity model in this approach, it is possible to minimize the required effort while still having sufficient governance. From a series of interviews that have been carried out we could conclude that most current SOA projects - although relatively limited in their scope - raise governance issues that need to be addressed to prevent future problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amar, M. and Muhammad, N, Service oriented architecture Registry, available at http://idenet.bth.se/servlet/download/element/36064/SOA+Registry.pdf
 
2
 
3
Aziz, S. Obitz, T., Modi, R., Sarkar, S., Enterprise Architecture: A governance Framework, Part I and Part II, White papers, Infosys, September 2005, available at http://www.infosys.com/services/systemintegration/EA-Governance-1.pdf
 
4
 
5
Brown, W. A., Moore, G. and Tegan, W., SOA governance---IBM's approach, Effective governance through the IBM SOA Governance Management Method approach, White paper, August 2006, available at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/soa/pdf/SOA_Gov_Proc ess_Overview.pdf
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Heffner, R., SOA investment strategies: Case studies on how enterprises are paying for SOA, Forrester Research, Cambridge USA, May 19, 2006.
 
11
IT Governance Institute, COBIT 4.1, available at http://www.isaca.org
 
12
IT Governance Institute, Board Briefing on IT Governance, 2nd Edition, Rolling Meadows, IL, 2003.
 
13
Legner, C. and Heutschi, R., SOA adoption in practice -- findings from early SOA implementations, In Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007) (St. Gallen, Switserland, June 7-9-2007), 1643--1654.
 
14
Lewis, G; Morris, E.; O'Brien, L.; Smith, D. and Wrage, L.; SMART: The service-oriented migration and reuse technique, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2005-TN-029, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.
 
15
Mitra, T, A case for SOA governance, published 16-08-2005, viewed 17-07-2007 at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-soa-govern/
 
16
Nadhan, E. G., Service-Oriented Architecture: Implementation Challenges, Microsoft Architect Journal 2, April 2004, 24--32
 
17
 
18
Progress Software, Why runtime governance is critical for SOA: a SOA Primer, 2005, available at: http://www.actional.com/resources/whitepapers/
 
19
Scheper, W., Mastering complexity using the Business Maturity Model, May 2005, available at http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/nl_eng_report_b usinesss_maturity_model_230505x.pdf
 
20
Software Engineering Institute. CMMI for development, version 1.2. 2006, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/06.reports/pdf/06tr0 08.pdf
 
21
Systinet, SOA governance: balancing control & flexibility, september 2006, available at: http://www.systinet.com/resources/white_papers
 
22
The Open Group, TOGAF#8482; Version 8.1.1 "Enterprise Edition", 2006, https://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/.
 
23
TIBCO, SOA governance best practices: an introduction, whitepaper from www.tibco.com, published November 2005.
 
24
Van den Dobbelsteen, R., Security in Service-Oriented Architectures, Master thesis, University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.
 
25
Vazquez, E., Service Oriented Architecture Governance: The Basics, viewed 15-06-2007, published 11-06-2007 at http://www.infoq.com/articles/soa-governance-basics
 
26
Von Goetz, J., Methodology for Service Identification and Service Design within Collaborative Service Governance Lifecycle Reference Framework, Master thesis, University of Mannheim, Germany, 2007.
 
27
 
28
Webmethods, SOA governance: enabling sustainable success with SOA, published October 2006, viewed 22-02-2007 at http://www1.webmethods.com/PDF/whitepapers/SOA_Governance.pdf
 
29
L. Wilkes, Good Governance Practices for SOA, CBDI webcast, published 20-03-2007, viewed 28-03-2007 at http://whatis.bitpipe.com/detail/RES/1173402876_505.html
 
30
Windley, P., Teaming up for SOA, Infoworld.com, January 03 2007, available at http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/03/05/10FEcollabgov_ 1.html

Collaborative Colleagues:
T. G. J. Schepers: colleagues
M. E. Iacob: colleagues
P. A. T. Van Eck: colleagues