Research between natural and cultural history information: Benefits and IT-requirements for transdisciplinarity

ABSTRACT

This article describes an approach to transdisciplinary information integration employing a core ontology. Information is modeled here with an ontology based on the CIDOC-Conceptual Reference Model (ISO 21127). When instantiated with some realistic examples taken from the field of biodiversity (collecting, determination, type creation, expedition, and observation events), the formal specification of semantic concepts makes scientific activities commonly understandable. Ontologies not only allow one to describe the results of scientific activities, such as a description of a biological species, but they can help to clarify the path by which the goal was reached. In particular, they provide a high-level uniform representation of transdisciplinary research activities and results. Ontologies as knowledge representation tools will therefore have strong impact on methodological questions and research strategies for different domains such as biology, archaeology, art history, and socio-economy. They can be regarded as semantic glue between and within scientific and scholarly domains as demonstrated in a series of examples. Following this approach, some requirements for research and development of integrated IT environments between memory instutions are derived.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abt, A. 1908. Die Aplogie des Apuleius von Madura und die antike Zauberei. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten IV, Heft 2, Giessen.
• 2: Chen, H., Martinez, J., Ng, T. D., and Schatz, B. R. 1997. A concept space approach to addressing the vocabulary problem in scientific information retrieval: An experiment on the worm community system. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 48, 1, 17--31.
• 3: Crofts, N. 1999. Implementing the CIDOC CRM with a relational database. MCN Spectra 24, 1.
• 4: Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., and Stiff, M. 2003. Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/definition_cidoc.html.
• 5: Dempsey, L. 2000. Scientific, industrial, and cultural heritage: A shared approach: A research framework for digital libraries, museums and archives. Ariadne 22, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/dempsey/intro.html.
• 6: Dietrich, C., Palm, G., Riede, K., and Schwenker, F. 2004. Classification of bioacoustic time series based on the combination of global and local decisions. Int. J. Patt. Recogn. 37, 2293--2305.
• 7: Dittrich, S. and Dittrich, L. 2004.Lexikon der Tiersymbole. Tiere als Sinnbilder in der Malerei des 14.-17. Jahrhunderts. 2nd Ed. Imhof, Petersberg, Germany.
• 8: Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC CRM—An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine (Special Issue on Ontologies) 24, 3.
• 9: Doerr, M., Schaller, K., and Theodoridou, M. 2004. Integration of complementary archaeological sources. In Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Prato, Italy.
• 10: Duckworth, W. D., Genoways, H. H., and Rose, C. L. 1993. Preserving natural science collections: Chronicle of our environmental heritage. National Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Property, Washington, DC.
• 11: Eades, D. C. and Otte, D. 2007. Orthoptera species file online. Version 2.0/3.2. http://osf2.orthoptera.org/HomePage.aspx.
• 12: Gill, T. 2004. Building semantic bridges between museums, libraries and archives: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. First Monday http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_5/gill/.
• 13: Göttlicher, D. and Bendix, J. 2004. Eine modulare Multi-User Datenbank für eine ökologische Forschergruppe mit heterogenem Datenbestand. Zeitschrift für Agrarinformatik 4/04, 95--103.
• 14: Guralnick, R. P., Wieczorek, J., Beaman, R., Hijmans, R. J. and The Biogeomancer Working Group. 2006. BioGeomancer: Automated georeferencing to map the world's biodiversity data. PLoS Biology 4, 11, 381.
• 15: Graf, F. 1996. Gottesnähe und Schadenzauber. Die Magie in der griechisch-römischen Antike. München, Germany.
• 16: Gruber, T. R. 1993. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43, 907--928.
• 17: Guarino, N. 1998. Formal ontology and information systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, N. Guarnio, Ed. Trento, Italy, IOS Press, 3--15.
• 18: Hamkens, F. H. 1940. Der Truthahn im Dom zu Schleswig. Germanenerbe 5, 155--156.
• 19: Ingrisch, S., Riede, K., and Lampe, K.-H. 2004. DORSA—Virtuelles Museum deutscher Orthopterensammlungen online. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 14, 479--482.
• 20: Ingrisch, S., Riede, K., Lampe, K.-H., and Dietrich, C. 2004. DORSA—A “Virtual Museum” of German Orthoptera Collections. Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana 82, 2, 349--356.
• 21: Kalfoglou, Y. and Schorlemmer, W. M. 2003. Ontology mapping: The state of the art. Knowl. Engin. Rev. 18, 1, 1--31.
• 22: Karny, H. H. 1928. Ueber die Gryllacriden der Deutschen Kaiserin Augustafluß-Expedition 1913. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 14, 3--4, 83--114.
• 23: Karsch, F. 1891a. Uebersicht der von Herrn Dr. Paul Preuss auf der Barombi-Station in Kamerun gesammelten Locustodeen. Als Anhang: Ueber die Mecopodiden. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 36, 317--346.
• 24: Karsch, F. 1891b. Verzeichniss der von Herrn Dr. Paul Preuss in Kamerun erbeuteten Acridiodeen. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 36, 1, 175--196.
• 25: Klapperich, J. 1954. Auf Forschungsreisen in Afghanistan. Entomologische Blätter 50, 107--118.
• 26: Klug, J. C. F. 1830--1832. Symbolae physicae seu icones et descriptiones Insectorum, quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalen Friderici Guilelmi Hemprich et Christiani Godofredi Ehrenberg medicinae et chirurgiae doctorum studio novae aut illustratae redierunt. In Symbolae Physicae Zool. 2 (Insect. 3), Decas prima , fol. a-i, pls 1-10 [no Orthoptera](1829); Decas secunda, fol. a-f, pls. 11--20 (1830); Decas tertia, fol. a-l, pls. 21--30 (1832), F. G. Hemprich, and C. H. Ehrenberg, Berlin, Germany, 1929--1945.
• 27: Kopp, P. 2000. Die Truthähne im Schleswiger Dom. Archäologisch. http://www.archaeologisch.de/truthahnschleswig.html.
• 28: Lampe, K.-H., Riede, K., and Ingrisch, S. 2005. Repatriation of knowledge about insects and types through the DORSA virtual museum. Beiträge zur Entomologie 55, 2, 477--484.
• 29: Mandia, S. A. 2006. Influence of dramatic climate shifts on european civilizations: The rise and fall of the Vikings and the Little Ice Age in Europe. http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/index.html.
• 30: Mauthe, G. 1994. Die Österreichische Brasilienexpedition 1817--1820. In Brasilianische Reise 1817--1820. Carl Friedrich Philipp von Martius zum 200. Geburtstag. J. Helbig, Ed. Hirmer Verlag, München, Germany, 13--27.
• 31: Mittelstrass, J. 2001. On transdisciplinarity. In Proceedings of Science and the Future of Mankind. Science for Man and Man for Science. Vatican City, 527, XV tables, 495--500.
• 32: Murphey, P. C., Guralnick, R. P., Glaubitz, R., Neufeld, D., and Ryan, J. A. 2004. Georeferencing of museum collections: A review of problems and automated tools, and the methodology developed by the mountain and plains spatio-temporal database-informatics initiative (Mapstedi). PhyloInformatics 3, 1--29.
• 33: Nelson, G. W. 1940. A Greek votive Iynx-wheel in Boston. Amer. J. Archaeol. 44, 4, 443--456.
• 34: Neuberger, H. 1970. Climate in art. Weather 25, 46--56.
• 35: Raby, P. 1997. Bright Paradise: Victorian Scientific Travellers. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
• 36: Ramme, W. 1929. Afrikanische Acrididae. Revisionen und Beschreibungen wenig bekannter und neuer Gattungen und Arten. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 15, 247--492.
• 37: Ramme, W. 1941. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Acrididen-Fauna des indomalayischen und benachbarter Gebiete (Orth.) mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tiergeographie von Celebes. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 25, 1--243.
• 38: Ramme, W. 1951. Zur Systematik, Faunistik und Biologie der Orthopteren von Südost-Europa und Vorderasien. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 27, 1--432.
• 39: Riede, K. Nischk, F., Dietrich, C., Thiel, C., and Schwenker, F. 2006. Automated annotation of Orthoptera songs: First results from analysing the DORSA sound repository. J. Orthoptera Resear. 15, 1, 105--113.
• 40: Rdf. 2004. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
• 41: Ryan, W. and Pitman, W. 1998. Noah's Flood: The New Scientific Discoveries About the Event That Changed History. Sinon & Schuster, New York, NY.
• 42: Sanderson, E. W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. V., and Woolmer, G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52, 891--904.
• 43: Vajda, L. 2004. Wendehals und Liebeszauber. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44, 185--198.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.12 Interoperability

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.1 Systems and Information Theory
          Subjects: Value of information
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.1 Logical Design
          Subjects: Schema and subschema
      H.2.8 Database applications
          Subjects: Scientific databases
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.4 Systems and Software
          Subjects: Information networks
      H.3.7 Digital Libraries

  J. Computer Applications
  J.3 LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
  J.5 ARTS AND HUMANITIES

General Terms:
Design, Management, Standardization, Theory

Keywords:
ISO 21127, Interdisciplinary research, biodiversity, crossdisciplinary search, cultural heritage, georeferencing, information integration, museums, natural history, ontologies, semantic enrichment, system requirements, transdisciplinarity