skip to main content
10.1145/1368088.1368177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting requirements engineering for medical products: early consideration of user-perceived quality

Published:10 May 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The usability and, more generally, the overall user-perceived quality of medical devices is an important aspect, which is often insufficiently addressed in the corresponding system development activities. Fortunately, the development of new standards like IEC/DIN EN 60601-1-6 is strengthening the focus on usability / user acceptance issues. This paper argues for the need to consider usability and user acceptance issues in early system development phases like the requirements engineering phase. In this paper, an empirically validated new quality model for user satisfaction is described first. The importance of the quality aspects included in this quality model for the medical domain is outlined. Then, the new quality model is used to develop a systematic methodology called Appraisal and Measurement of User Satisfaction (AMUSE), which allows gathering user acceptance information early in system development. The key activities of the AMUSE methodology and typical application scenarios are shown. Further on, the application of AMUSE, which was developed in close cooperation with Siemens Corporate Technology, is demonstrated in a real-world scenario at Siemens Audiologische Technik, a line of business of Siemens Medical Solutions. At the end, the first lessons learned from the application of the AMUSE methodology in this medical domain are discussed.

References

  1. Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989): 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Denger, C., Feldmann, R., Höst, M., Lindholm, C. and Shull, F. A Snapshot of the State of Practice in Software Development for Medical Devices, In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, to appear, 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Denger, C., Feldmann, R., Höst, M., Lindholm, C. and Shull, F. State of the Practice in Software Development for Medical Device Production, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany. IESE Internal Report, 2007. (to obtain by request to the authors)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dörr, J., Hartkopf, S., Kerkow, D., Landmann, D. and Amthor, P. Built-in User Satisfaction: Feature Appraisal and Prioritization with AMUSE. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007) (New Delhi, India, October 15-19th, 2007). IEEE, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M. & Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's Appeal. Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing, The Hague, NL (pp. 201--208). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Karlsson, J. and Ryan, K. Prioritizing requirements using a cost-value approach. IEEE Software, 14 (1997): 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. IEC 60601-1-6 Medical electrical equipment Part 1-6: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Usability IEC 62304 Medical Device Software -- Software Life Cycle ProcessesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ISO 14971 Medical Devices -- Application of risk management to medical devices. Revision of first edition (ISO 14971:2000) and ISO 14971:2000/Amd.1:2003, Geneva, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission. International Standard ISO/IEC 9126. Information technology --- Software product evaluation --- Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. Geneva, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Patterson, P. Fitting Human Factors in the Product Development Process. Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry, 28, 1 (2006): 124--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Venkatesh, V. Creating Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (1999): 239--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Wiegers, K. E. Software-Requirements. Microsoft Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kline, R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Second Edition, The Guilford Press, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supporting requirements engineering for medical products: early consideration of user-perceived quality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
          May 2008
          558 pages
          ISBN:9781605580791
          DOI:10.1145/1368088

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 May 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ICSE '08 Paper Acceptance Rate56of370submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2025

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader