ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Usage control platformization via trustworthy SELinux
Full text PdfPdf (179 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security table of contents
Tokyo, Japan
SESSION: Access control table of contents
Pages 245-248  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-979-1
Authors
Masoom Alam  IM | Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan
Jean-Pierre Seifert  Samsung Information Systems America, San Jose, California
Qi Li  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Xinwen Zhang  Samsung Information Systems America, San Jose, California
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368310.1368345
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Continuous access control after an object is released into a distributed environment has been regarded as the usage control problem and has been investigated by different researchers in various papers. However, the enabling technology for usage control is a challenging problem and the space has not been fully explored yet. In this paper we identify the general requirements of a trusted usage control enforcement in heterogeneous computing environments, and also propose a general platform architecture to meet these requirements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Fairplay. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairPlay.
 
2
TCG Specification Architecture Overview. https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org.
 
3
Windows media digital rights management (DRM). http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/drm/default.aspx.
4
 
5
J. P. Anderson. Computer security technology planning study volume II, ESD-TR-73-51, vol. II, electronic systems division, air force systems command, hanscom field, bedford, MA 01730. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/history/ande72.pdf, Oct. 1972.
 
6
D. E. Bell and L. J. LaPadula. Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations and model. Mitre Corp. Report No. M74--244, Bedford, Mass., 1975.
 
7
K. J. Biba. Integrity consideration for secure computer system. Technical report, Mitre Corp. Report TR-3153, Bedford, Mass., 1977.
 
8
9
 
10
Department of Defense National Computer Security Center. Department of Defense Trusted Computer Systems Evaluation Criteria, December 1985. DoD 5200.28-STD.
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
M. Hilty, D. Basin, and A. Pretschner. On obligations. In Proc. of 10th European Symp. on Research in Computer Security, September 2005.
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
P. Loscocco, S. Smalley, P. Muckelbauer, R. Taylor, J. Turner, and J. Farrell. The inevitability of failure: The flawed assumption of computer security in modern computing environments. In Proceedings of the National Information Systems Security Conference, October 1998.
19
20
 
21
 
22
23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Masoom Alam: colleagues
Jean-Pierre Seifert: colleagues
Qi Li: colleagues
Xinwen Zhang: colleagues