skip to main content
10.1145/1368310.1368359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A short anonymously revocable group signature scheme from decision linear assumption

Published:18 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In group signature schemes, a signature is anonymous for a verifier, while only a designated Privacy Manager (PM) can identify the signer. This identification is used for tracing a dishonest anonymous signer in case of an illegal act using the signature. However, PM can violate signers' anonymity. Recently, Brickell and Li propose a novel countermeasure for the anonymous dishonest signer without PM in the setting of the direct anonymous attestation. Here, we call the generalized group signature version anonymously revocable group signature scheme. In this scheme, after an illegal act using a group signature was found, the membership of the dishonest signer can be anonymously revoked for excluding the signer without the help of any PM. However, since the Brickell-Li scheme is based on the RSA assumption and the DDH assumption, the signature is long. In this paper, we propose a short anonymously revocable group signature scheme from supersingular curves, where we adopt the decision linear (DLIN) assumption. Compared to the simple adoption of the Brickell-Li DDH-based revoking approach to supersingular curves, the length of our signature is reduced to about from 30% to 60%.

References

  1. M. Bellare, D. Micciancio, and B. Warinschi, "Foundations of group signatures: Formal definitions, simplified requirements, and a construction based on general assumptions," Proc. EUROCRYPT 2003, LNCS 2656, pp.614--629, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Boneh, X. Boyen, and H. Shacham, "Short group signatures," Proc. CRYPTO 2004, LNCS 3152, pp.41--55, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Boneh and H. Shacham, "Group signatures with verifier-local revocation," Proc. ACM-CCS '04, pp.168--177, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Brickell and J. Li, "Enhanced privacy ID: A direct anonymous attestation scheme with enhanced revocation capabilities." Proc. ACM-WPES '07, also in Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2007/194, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Chaum and E. van Heijst, "Group signatures," Proc. EUROCRYPT '91, LNCS 547, pp.241--246, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Furukawa and H. Imai, "An efficient group signature scheme from bilinear maps," Proc. ACISP 2005, LNCS 3574, pp.455--467, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Kiayias, Y. Tsiounis, and M. Yung, "Traceable signatures," Proc. EUROCRYPT 2004, LNCS 3027, pp.571--589, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. P. Tsang, M. H. Au, A. Kapadia, S. W. Smith, "Blacklistable anonymous credentials: blocking misbehaving users without TTPs," Proc. ACM-CCS '07, pp.72--81, 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A short anonymously revocable group signature scheme from decision linear assumption

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASIACCS '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security
        March 2008
        399 pages
        ISBN:9781595939791
        DOI:10.1145/1368310

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 March 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate418of2,322submissions,18%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader