Cooperation and coordination concerns in a distributed software development project

ABSTRACT

Enabling effective coordination of work in large distributed software projects requires cooperation between participants across multiple teams, sites, and skill sets. To determine how practicing software engineers, in a distributed software development setting, maintain awareness of dependencies and coordinate to resolve dependencies in their work, we conducted a field study that used interviews and informal observation of a distributed software team. In this paper we present key interesting themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis: proximity, modification request authoring patterns, and uncooperative behaviours. We discuss these findings and outline future quantitative research plans to triangulate the methods used by software developers with recorded activities in engineering repositories to increase the generalizability of the research findings.

REFERENCES

• 1: K. Charmaz. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006.
• 2: M. Conway. How do committees invent. Datamation, 14(4):28--31, 1968.
• 3: Daniela Damian , Luis Izquierdo , Janice Singer , Irwin Kwan, Awareness in the Wild: Why Communication Breakdowns Occur, Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Software Engineering, p.81-90, August 27-30, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICGSE.2007.13]
• 4: D. Damian, S. Marczak, and I. Kwan. Collaboration patterns and the impact of distance on awareness in requirements-centered social networks. RE, 0:59--68, 2007.
• 5: Cleidson R. de Souza , Stephen Quirk , Erik Trainer , David F. Redmiles, Supporting collaborative software development through the visualization of socio-technical dependencies, Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, November 04-07, 2007, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/1316624.1316646]
• 6: B. Glaser and A. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, 1967.
• 7: Christine A. Halverson , Jason B. Ellis , Catalina Danis , Wendy A. Kellogg, Designing task visualizations to support the coordination of work in software development, Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 04-08, 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1180875.1180883]
• 8: J. Herbsleb and A. Mockus. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 29(6):481--494, 2003.
• 9: James D. Herbsleb , Audris Mockus, Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.28 n.5, September 2003
• 10: Robert Kraut , Carmen Egido , Jolene Galegher, Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.1-12, September 26-28, 1988, Portland, Oregon, United States [doi>10.1145/62266.62267]
• 11: Thomas W. Malone , Kevin Crowston, The interdisciplinary study of coordination, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.26 n.1, p.87-119, March 1994 [doi>10.1145/174666.174668]
• 12: A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, 1998.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.3 Software Management
          Subjects: Software development

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Programming teams

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
coordination, dependency management, distributed software development