Composing knowledge fragments: a next generation ide

ABSTRACT

When building a software system, software developers each contribute a flow of information that together forms the system. As they work, programmers continuously consult various facts (knowledge) about this information to answer their questions about the system. The knowledge most easily accessed today in a programming environment involves facts about the structure of the program. However, the knowledge required by a programmer is broader than just structure; it also includes knowledge about design, requirements, and the development process, to name just a few other sources. To enable developers to access this knowledge more efficiently, our goal is to develop a model for programming environments that allows various fragments of different kinds of knowledge to be configured flexibly. This model would enable new presentations to show these knowledge fragments in ways that more directly answer programmers' questions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Li-Te Cheng , Susanne Hupfer , Steven Ross , John Patterson, Jazzing up Eclipse with collaborative tools, Proceedings of the 2003 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange, p.45-49, October 27-27, 2003, Anaheim, California [doi>10.1145/965660.965670]
• 2: Brian de Alwis , Gail C. Murphy, Answering conceptual queries with Ferret, Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, May 10-18, 2008, Leipzig, Germany [doi>10.1145/1368088.1368092]
• 3: P. T. Devanbu , R. J. Brachman , P. G. Selfridge , B. W. Ballard, LaSSIE—a knowledge-based software information system, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Software engineering, p.249-261, March 26-30, 1990, Nice, France
• 4: Stephen G. Eick , Joseph L. Steffen , Eric E. Sumner, Jr., Seesoft-A Tool for Visualizing Line Oriented Software Statistics, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.18 n.11, p.957-968, November 1992 [doi>10.1109/32.177365 ]
• 5: Jon Froehlich , Paul Dourish, Unifying Artifacts and Activities in a Visual Tool for Distributed Software Development Teams, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.387-396, May 23-28, 2004
• 6: Reid Holmes , Gail C. Murphy, Using structural context to recommend source code examples, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering, May 15-21, 2005, St. Louis, MO, USA [doi>10.1145/1062455.1062491]
• 7: Doug Janzen , Kris De Volder, Navigating and querying code without getting lost, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, p.178-187, March 17-21, 2003, Boston, Massachusetts [doi>10.1145/643603.643622]
• 8: Mik Kersten , Gail C. Murphy, Mylar: a degree-of-interest model for IDEs, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, p.159-168, March 14-18, 2005, Chicago, Illinois [doi>10.1145/1052898.1052912]
• 9: Mik Kersten , Gail C. Murphy, Using task context to improve programmer productivity, Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, November 05-11, 2006, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1181775.1181777]
• 10: Andrew J. Ko , Robert DeLine , Gina Venolia, Information Needs in Collocated Software Development Teams, Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering, p.344-353, May 20-26, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICSE.2007.45]
• 11: Martin P. Robillard , Wesley Coelho , Gail C. Murphy, How Effective Developers Investigate Source Code: An Exploratory Study, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.30 n.12, p.889-903, December 2004 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2004.101]
• 12: Davor ČubraniĆ , Gail C. Murphy , Janice Singer , Kellogg S. Booth, Learning from project history: a case study for software development, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 06-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA [doi>10.1145/1031607.1031622]
• 13: Davor Cubranic , Gail C. Murphy , Janice Singer , Kellogg S. Booth, Hipikat: A Project Memory for Software Development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.31 n.6, p.446-465, June 2005 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2005.71]
• 14: G. Venolia. Bridges between silos: A microsoft research project. Technical report, Microsoft Research, 2005.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.6 Programming Environments

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
software artifacts, software development