skip to main content
10.1145/1378889.1378898acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The myth of find: user behaviour and attitudes towards the basic search feature

Published:16 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ubiquitous within-document text search feature (Ctrl-F) is considered by users to be a key advantage in electronic information seeking [1]. However what people say they do and what they actually do are not always consistent. It is necessary to understand, acknowledge and identify the cause of this inconsistency. We must identify the physical and cognitive factors to develop better methods and tools, assisting with the search process. This paper discusses the limitations and myths of Ctrl-f in information seeking. A prototype system for within-document search is introduced. Three user studies portray shared behaviour and attitudes, common between participants regarding within-document searching.

References

  1. G. Buchanan and F. Loizides. Investigating document triage on paper and electronic media. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Reasearch and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, number 35, pages 416--427, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. J. Harper, I. Koychev, Y. Sun, and I. Pirie. Within-document retrieval: A user-centred evaluation of relevance profiling. Inf. Retr., 7(3-4):265--290, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. J.Harper, I. Koychev, and Y. Sun. Query-based document skimming: A user-centred evaluation of relevance profiling. European Conference on Inf. Retr., pages 377--392, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Jones and G. Marsden. Mobile Interaction Design Wiley, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. J. K. and J. D. M. The use of automatically obtained keyword classifications for information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, (3):175--201, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Marchionini. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Spink, B. J. Jansen, D. Wolfram, and T. Saracevic. From e-sex to e-commerce: Web search changes. Computer, 35(3):107--109, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. van Rijsbergen, S. Robertson, and M. Porter. New models in Probabilistic Information Retrieval (British Library Research and Development Report, no. 5587). Cambridge, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The myth of find: user behaviour and attitudes towards the basic search feature

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      JCDL '08: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
      June 2008
      490 pages
      ISBN:9781595939982
      DOI:10.1145/1378889

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      JCDL '08 Paper Acceptance Rate33of117submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader