skip to main content
article
Free Access

Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin?

Published:01 December 1992Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 Belkin, N.J. Cognitive models and information transfet, Soc. Sci. Inf. Stud. 4 (1984), 111-129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2 Belkin, N.J. and Croft, W.B. Retrieval, techniques. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, M.E. Williams. Ed. Chapr. 4, pp. 109- 145, elseview, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Belkin, N.J., Oddy, r.N. and Brooks, H.M. ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory, J. Doc. 38, 2 (June 1982), 61-71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4 Borman, C.L. All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual diffenrences. Inf. Process. Manage. 25,3 (1989), 237-251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 Croft, w.B. and Das, R. Experiments with query acquistioni and use in document retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (1990), pp. 349-368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 Croft, W.B., Turtle, H.R. and Lewis, D.D. The use of phrases and structured quesries in information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (1991), pp. 32-45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landaue, T.K. and Harshamn. R. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41(1990), 391-407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8 Ekmecioglu, f.C., robertson, A.M. and Willett, P. Effectiveness of query expansion in ranked-output document retrieval systems. J. Inf. Sci. 18 (1992), 139-147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Fuhr, N. and Buckley, c. Probabilistic document indexing from relevance feedback data. In Proceedings of the Thirteent International Conference on Research and Developmnet in Information Retreival, Jean-Luc Vidick, Ed. ACM, New York, Sept. 1990, pp. 45- 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Fukunga, K. Ed. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 Lewiss, D.D. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorizaton tast. In Proceedings fo the Fifteenth Annual International ACN SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1992), pp. 37-50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 Lewis, D., Croft, W.B. and Bhandaru, N. Language-oriented information retrieval, Int. J. Intell. syst. 4 (1989). 285-318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Lewis, D.D. Representation and Learning in Information Retrieval. Ph.D. dissertaton. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 Packer. K.H. and Soergel, D. The imporatnce of sdi for current awareness in fieds with severe scatter of information. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 30, 3 (1979), 125-135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15 Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networkd of Plaussible Infernec Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 Robertson, S.E. The Probability ranking principle in IR. J. Doc. 33, 4 (Dec. 1977), 294-304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17 Robertson, s.E., The methodology of information retrieval experiment. Information Retrieval Experiment. In K. Sparck Jones, Ed. Chapt. 1, pp. 9-31. Butterworths, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Salton, G. Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems. Commun. ACM 29, 7 (July 1986), 648-656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19 Salton, G. and Buckley, C. Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval Inf. Process. Manage. 24, 3, (1988), 513-524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 salton, G. and Buckley, F. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. JASIS 41 (1990), 288-297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21 Salton, G., Fox, E. and Wu, H. Extended Boolean information retrieval. Commun. ACM 26, 11 (Nov. 1983), 1022-1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22 Salton, G. and McGill, M.J. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23 Salton, G. and Luckmann, T. Structures of the Life World. Northwestern University Press, Evanson, Ill, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 Sparck Jones, K. Automatic Keyword Classification for Information Retrieval. Archon, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Sparck Jones, K. Automatic indexing J. Doc. 30,4 (1974), 393-432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 Su, L.T. Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage, 28, 4(1992), 503- 516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27 Sundheim, B.Ed. Proceedings of the Third Message Understanding Evaluation and Conference. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altosm Calif., 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 Tong, R.M., Appelbaum, L.A. and Askman, V.N. A knowledge representation for conceptual information retrieval, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 4, 2 (1989), 259-283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 Turtle , H, and Croft, W.B. Efficient probabilistic inference for text retrievla. In Proceedings RIAO 3 (1991), pp. 644-661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Turtle, H.R. and Croft, W.B. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 3 (1991), 187-222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31 Turtle, H.R. and Croft, W.B. A comparison of text retreival modles. Comput. J, 35, 3 (1992), 279-290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. 32 van Rijsbergen, C.J. Information Retrieval, Butterworkths, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. 33 Willett, P. Recent trends in hierarchic ocument clustering: A critical reveiw. Inf. Process. Manage. 24, 5 (1988), 577-598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin?

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Stephen Charles Smithson

        The institutional barriers between information retrieval research (traditionally carried out in schools of library or information science) and the more mainstream computing and business information systems research are being slowly dismantled, thanks to papers like this. The authors, who come from the information retrieval research community, have done a good job of comparing recently introduced filtering systems, which operate on streams of unstructured or semi-structured data (such as news feeds and electronic mail), with information retrieval systems, where research stretches back 20 or 30 years. The authors clearly demonstrate a considerable similarity between the two types of systems and go on to argue that researchers and developers of information filtering systems could learn a lot from studying previous research into information retrieval. They focus on a probabilistic model, the inference net model, which they apply to information filtering. They emphasize the importance of indexing and the estimation of probabilities, as well as noting the efficiency problems of implementing such a model. This paper is a timely and useful comparison, involving the currently popular research area of information filtering. The argument that the use of information retrieval models, such as the probabilistic approach, can provide useful insight into the issues involved is sound. In cataloguing information retrieval research, however, the authors neglect to mention that most of the indexing and matching schemas they mention still have not been used in operational systems of any size and the performance results are mostly based on small-scale laboratory experiments.

        Robert G Crawford

        The issues are wonderfully placed in perspective in this lead paper in a CACM special section on information filtering, providing a useful framework for consideration of this subject. Three aspects of the paper give it strength. First, models for retrieval and filtering are presented and described. The authors strip away the terminology to get at the heart of what is really going on with retrieval and filtering. Second, the lessons from information retrieval research that apply to filtering are categorized and discussed. Third, the paper includes a good list of aspects of the general problem for which filtering requires further research. Filtering is discussed in the context of a specific probabilistic retrieval model, the inference net model. The analysis is clear and useful.

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 35, Issue 12
          Special issue on information filtering
          Dec. 1992
          85 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/138859
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1992 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 December 1992

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader