skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389136acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modular neuroevolution for multilegged locomotion

Published: 12 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Legged robots are useful in tasks such as search and rescue because they can effectively navigate on rugged terrain. However, it is difficult to design controllers for them that would be stable and robust. Learning the control behavior is difficult because optimal behavior is not known, and the search space is too large for reinforcement learning and for straightforward evolution. As a solution, this paper proposes a modular approach for evolving neural network controllers for such robots. The search space is effectively reduced by exploiting symmetry in the robot morphology, and encoding it into network modules. Experiments involving physically realistic simulations of a quadruped robot produce the same symmetric gaits, such as pronk, pace, bound and trot, that are seen in quadruped animals. Moreover, the robot can transition dynamically to more effective gaits when faced with obstacles. The modular approach also scales well when the number of legs or their degrees of freedom are increased. Evolved non-modular controllers, in contrast, produce gaits resembling crippled animals that are much less effective and do not scale up as a result. Hand-designed controllers are also less effective, especially on an obstacle terrain. These results suggest that the modular approach is effective for designing robust locomotion controllers for multilegged robots.

References

[1]
R. D. Beer, H. J. Chiel, and L. S. Sterling. Heterogeneous neural networks for adaptive behavior in dynamic environments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, pages 577--585, 1989.
[2]
R. D. Beer and J. C. Gallagher. Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 1(1):91--122, 1992.
[3]
A. Billard and A. J. Ijspeert. Biologically inspired neural controllers for motor control in a quadruped robot. In Proceedings of IJCNN-2000, pages 637--641, 2000.
[4]
R. A. Brooks. A robot that walks; emergent behaviors from a carefully evolved network. Technical Report AIM-1091, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
[5]
J. E. Clark. Design, Simulation, and Stability of a Hexapedal Running Robot. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2004.
[6]
J. J. Collins and I. N. Stewart. Coupled nonlinear oscillators and the symmetries of animal gaits. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 3(1):349--392, 1993.
[7]
D. Filliat, J. Kodjabachian, and J.-A. Meyer. Evolution of neural controllers for locomotion and obstacle avoidance in a six-legged robot. Connection Science, 11(3/4):225--242, 1999.
[8]
D. Floreano and F. Mondada. Evolutionary neurocontrollers for autonomous mobile robots. Neural Networks, 11:1461--1478, 1998.
[9]
M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart. Patterns of oscillation in coupled cell systems. In Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics: Volume in Honor of the 60th Birthday of J. E. Marsden, chapter 8, pages 243--286, 2002.
[10]
F. Gomez and R. Miikkulainen. Active guidance for a finless rocket using neuroevolution. In Proceedings of GECCO-2003, pages 2084--2095, 2003.
[11]
F. J. Gomez, J. Schmidhuber, and R. Miikkulainen. Efficient non-linear control through neuroevolution. In Proceedings of ECML-2006, pages 654--662, 2006.
[12]
F. Gruau. Automatic definition of modular neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 3(2):151--183, 1994.
[13]
F. Gruau. Neural Network Synthesis Using Cellular Encoding and the Genetic Algorithm. PhD thesis, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, France, 1994.
[14]
P. Holmes, R. J. Full, D. Koditschek, and J. Guckenheimer. The dynamics of legged locomotion: Models, analyses, and challenges. SIAM Review, 48(2):207--304, 2006.
[15]
G. S. Hornby and J. B. Pollack. Creating high-level components with a generative representation for body-brain evolution. Artificial Life, 8(3), 2002.
[16]
D. E. Koditschek, R. J. Full, and M. Buehler. Mechanical aspects of legged locomotion control. Arthropod Structure and Development, 33(3):251--272, July 2004.
[17]
D. E. Moriarty and R. Miikkulainen. Hierarchical evolution of neural networks. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 428--433, 1998.
[18]
F. Murtagh. Clustering in massive data sets. In Handbook of Massive Data Sets, chapter 14, pages 501--543, 2002.
[19]
ODE, 2007. \beginsmallhttp://www.ode.org\endsmall.
[20]
OGRE, 2007. \beginsmallhttp://www.ogre3d.org\endsmall.
[21]
OPAL, 2007. \beginsmallhttp://opal.sourceforge.net\endsmall.
[22]
Open BEAGLE, 2007. \beginsmallhttp://beagle.gel.ulaval.ca\endsmall.
[23]
C. M. A. Pinto and M. Golubitsky. Central pattern generators for bipedal locomotion. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 53(3):474--489, 2006.
[24]
M. H. Raibert. Legged robots. Communications of the ACM, 29(6):499--514, 1986.
[25]
M. H. Raibert, M. Chepponis, and J. H. Benjamin Brown. Running on four legs as though they were one. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(2):70--82, 1986.
[26]
J. Reisinger and R. Miikkulainen. Acquiring evolvability through adaptive representations. In Proceeedings of GECCO-2007, 2007.
[27]
S. V. Shastri. A biologically consistent model of legged locomotion gaits. Biol. Cyber., 76(6):429--440, 1997.
[28]
K. Sims. Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition. In Proceedings of Alife IV, pages 28--39, 1994.
[29]
K. O. Stanley, B. D. Bryant, and R. Miikkulainen. Real-time neuroevolution in the NERO video game. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9(6):653--668, 2005.
[30]
R. A. Téllez, C. Angulo, and D. E. Pardo. Evolving the walking behaviour of a 12 dof quadruped using a distributed neural architecture. In Biologically Inspired Approaches to Advanced Information Technology, pages 5--19, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Evolutionary Machine Learning in RoboticsHandbook of Evolutionary Machine Learning10.1007/978-981-99-3814-8_23(657-694)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Adaptive locomotion control system for robots with arbitrarily modular designProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.156169(829-834)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019)Evolved embodied phase coordination enables robust quadruped robot locomotionProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3321707.3321762(133-141)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2008
1814 pages
ISBN:9781605581309
DOI:10.1145/1389095
  • Conference Chair:
  • Conor Ryan,
  • Editor:
  • Maarten Keijzer
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 July 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. controllers
  2. coupled cell systems
  3. locomotion
  4. modular neuroevolution
  5. multilegged robots

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Evolutionary Machine Learning in RoboticsHandbook of Evolutionary Machine Learning10.1007/978-981-99-3814-8_23(657-694)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Adaptive locomotion control system for robots with arbitrarily modular designProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.156169(829-834)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019)Evolved embodied phase coordination enables robust quadruped robot locomotionProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3321707.3321762(133-141)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2019
  • (2018)Adaptive control of multiped robotProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.071145(629-634)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Neuroevolution of Actively Controlled Virtual Characters - An Experiment for an Eight-Legged CharacterEngineering Applications of Neural Networks10.1007/978-3-319-98204-5_8(94-105)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2018
  • (2017)Effect of animat complexity on the evolution of hierarchical controlProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071246(147-154)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2017)Evolution of neural networksProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3067695.3067716(450-470)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2017
  • (2016)Evolving a behavioral repertoire for a walking robotEvolutionary Computation10.1162/EVCO_a_0014324:1(59-88)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
  • (2016)Evolving Neural NetworksProceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/2908961.2926977(229-253)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2016
  • (2016)Modular Neural Control for Object Transportation of a Bio-inspired Hexapod RobotFrom Animals to Animats 1410.1007/978-3-319-43488-9_7(67-78)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media