skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389190acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Application domain study of evolutionary algorithms in optimization problems

Published: 12 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of comparing and testing evolutionary algorithms, that is, the benchmarking problem, from an analysis point of view. A practical study of the application domain of four representative evolutionary algorithms is carried out using a relevant set of real-parameter function optimization benchmarks. The four selected algorithms are the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) and the Differential Evolution (DE), due to their successful results in recent studies, a Genetic Algorithm with real parameter operators, used here as a reference approach because it is probably the most familiar to researchers, and the Macroevolutionary algorithm (MA), which is not widely known but it shows a very remarkable behavior in some problems. The algorithms have been compared running several tests over the benchmark function set to analyze their capabilities from a practical point of view, in other words, in terms of their usability. The characterization of the algorithms is based on accuracy, stability and time consumption parameters thus establishing their operational scope and the type of optimization problems they are more suitable for.

References

[1]
Special Session on Real-Parameter Optimization at CEC-05, Edinburgh, UK, 2--5 Sept. 2005.
[2]
Workshop on Parameter Setting in Genetic and Evolutionary Algorithms (PSGEA 2005), June, 25--29, 2005, Washington, D.C. USA
[3]
Workshop on Evolutionary Algorithms for Dynamic Optimization Problems, June 26, 2005, Washington D.C.
[4]
Bui, L. T., Shan, Y., Qi, F., Abbass, H.A. Comparing Two Versions of Differential Evolution in Real Parameter Optimization, Tech. Report TR-ALAR-200504009, School of ITEE, University of New South Wales, 2005.
[5]
Costa, L. A., Parameter-less Evolution Strategy for Global Optimization, Proc. 6th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and Optimization, 2006, 622--627.
[6]
Yao, X., Liu, L., Lin G. Evolutionary Programming Made Faster, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1999, 82--102.
[7]
Suganthan, P. N., Hansen, N., Liang, J.J., Deb, K., Chen, Y.P., Auger, A., Tiwari, A. Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2005 Special Session on Real-Parameter Optimization, Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and KanGAL Report #2005005, IIT Kanpur, India, 2005.
[8]
Shang, Y. and Qiu, Y. A Note on the Extended Rosenbrock Function. Evol. Comput. 14, 1, 2006, 119--126.
[9]
Hansen, N. The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial, In www.bionik.tu-berlin.de/user/niko/, 2007
[10]
Becerra, J. A., Santos, J., Duro, R.J., Robot Controller Evolution with Macroevolutionary Algorithms, Information Processing with Evolutionary Algorithms From Industrial Applications to Academic Speculations, 2005, 117--128
[11]
Becerra, J. A., Díaz-Casás, V., Duro, R.J., Exploring Macroevolutionary Algorithms: Some Extensions and Improvements, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4507, Springer-Verlag, 2007, 308--315
[12]
Holland, J.H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, Univ. Michigan Press, 1975
[13]
Goldberg, D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, 1989
[14]
Herrera, F., Lozano, M., Verdegay, J.L. Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: Operators and tools for behaviorial analysis. Artificial Intellig. Review, 12(4), 1998, 265--319.
[15]
Eshelman, L.J., Schaffer, J.D. Real-Coded Genetic Algorithms and Interval Schemata, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, 1993, 187--202.
[16]
Michalewicz, Z. Genetic algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
[17]
Hansen, N. and A. Ostermeier. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2), 2001, 159--195.
[18]
Auger, A, and Hansen, N. A Restart CMA Evolution Strategy With Increasing Population Size. In Proc. of the IEEE, CEC 2005, 2005, 1769--1776.
[19]
Storn, R. and Price, K. Differential Evolution -- a Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces Technical Report TR-95-012, ICSI, 1995.
[20]
Rönkkönen, J., Kukkonen, S. Price, K. Real-parameter optimization with differential evolution, Proc. of 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 506--513.
[21]
Marin, J., and Solé, R. V. Macroevolutionary algorithms: A new optimization method on tness landscapes. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 3, 4, 1999, 272--286.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Uniform distribution driven adaptive differential evolutionApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-020-01707-2Online publication date: 22-Jun-2020
  • (2013)Evolutionary algorithm characterization in real parameter optimization problemsApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2013.01.00213:4(1902-1921)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
  • (2013)Building the “Automatic Body Condition Assessment System” (ABiCA), an Automatic Body Condition Scoring System using Active Shape Models and Machine LearningRecent Advances in Knowledge-based Paradigms and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-01649-8_10(145-168)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2013
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2008
1814 pages
ISBN:9781605581309
DOI:10.1145/1389095
  • Conference Chair:
  • Conor Ryan,
  • Editor:
  • Maarten Keijzer
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 July 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algorithm characterization
  2. comparison tests
  3. error measures
  4. evolutionary algorithms
  5. optimization benchmarks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Uniform distribution driven adaptive differential evolutionApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-020-01707-2Online publication date: 22-Jun-2020
  • (2013)Evolutionary algorithm characterization in real parameter optimization problemsApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2013.01.00213:4(1902-1921)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
  • (2013)Building the “Automatic Body Condition Assessment System” (ABiCA), an Automatic Body Condition Scoring System using Active Shape Models and Machine LearningRecent Advances in Knowledge-based Paradigms and Applications10.1007/978-3-319-01649-8_10(145-168)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2013
  • (2011)Are evolutionary algorithm competitions characterizing landscapes appropriatelyProceedings of the 13th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation10.1145/2001858.2002071(695-702)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2011

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media