skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389191acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Aiming for a theoretically tractable CSA variant by means of empirical investigations

Published: 12 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Evolution Strategies (ES) for black-box optimization of a function f:Rn->R are investigated. Namely, we consider the cumulative step-size adaptation (CSA) for the variance of multivariate zero-mean normal distributions, which are commonly used to sample new candidate solutions within Evolution Strategies (ES). Four simplifications of CSA are proposed and investigated empirically and evaluated statistically. The background for these four new CSA-derivatives, however, is NOT performance tuning, but our aim to accomplish a probabilistic/theoretical runtime analysis of an ES using some kind of a CSA in the near future, and a better understanding of this step-size control mechanisms. Therefore, we consider two test problems, namely the Sphere function without and with Gaussian noise.

References

[1]
Beyer, H.-G. (2001): The Theory of Evolution Strategies. Springer.
[2]
Beyer, H.-G., Arnold, D. V. (2003a): A comparison of evolution strategies with other direct search methods in the presence of noise. Computational Optimization and Applications, 24(1):135--159.
[3]
Beyer, H.-G., Arnold, D. V. (2003b): Qualms regarding the optimality of cumulative path length control in CSA/CMA-Evolution Strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 11(1):19--28.
[4]
Droste, S., Jansen, T., Wegener, I. (2002): On the analysis of the (1+1) Evolutionary Algorithm. Theoretical Computer Science, 276(1{2):51--82.
[5]
Hansen, N. (2008): List of references to various applications of CMA-ES. http://www.bionik.tu--berlin.de/user/niko/cmaapplications.pdf
[6]
Hansen, N., Ostermeier, A. (1996): Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC), 312--317.
[7]
Jägersküpper, J. (2003): Analysis of a simple evolutionary algorithm for minimization in Euclidean spaces. In Proc. 30th Int'l Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), vol. 2719 of LNCS, 1068--79, Springer.
[8]
Jägersküpper, J. (2005): How the (1+1) ES using isotropicmutations minimizes positive de.nite quadratic forms. Theoretical Computer Science, 361(1):38--56.
[9]
Jägersküpper, J. (2007): Algorithmic analysis of a basic evolutionary algorithm for continuous optimization. Theoretical Computer Science, 379(3):329--347.
[10]
Kolda, T. G., Lewis, R. M., Torczon, V. (2004): Optimization by direct search: New perspectives on some classical and m odern methods. SIAM Review, 45(3):385--482.
[11]
Nocedal, J., Wright, S. J. (1999): Numerical Optimization. Springer.
[12]
Schwefel, H.-P. (1981): Numerical Optimization of Computer Models. Wiley, New York.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An Experimental Method to Estimate Running Time of Evolutionary Algorithms for Continuous OptimizationIEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation10.1109/TEVC.2019.292154724:2(275-289)Online publication date: Apr-2020
  • (2010)On the analysis of self-adaptive evolution strategies on elliptic modelProceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation10.1145/1830483.1830554(369-376)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2010

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2008
1814 pages
ISBN:9781605581309
DOI:10.1145/1389095
  • Conference Chair:
  • Conor Ryan,
  • Editor:
  • Maarten Keijzer
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 July 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. empirical analysis
  2. evolution strategies
  3. sphere function

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An Experimental Method to Estimate Running Time of Evolutionary Algorithms for Continuous OptimizationIEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation10.1109/TEVC.2019.292154724:2(275-289)Online publication date: Apr-2020
  • (2010)On the analysis of self-adaptive evolution strategies on elliptic modelProceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation10.1145/1830483.1830554(369-376)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2010

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media