Abstract
Visualizations leverage the human visual system to support the process of sensemaking, in which information is collected, organized, and analyzed to generate knowledge and inform action. Although most research to date assumes a single-user focus on perceptual and cognitive processes, in practice, sensemaking is often a social process involving parallelization of effort, discussion, and consensus building. Thus, to fully support sensemaking, interactive visualization should also support social interaction. However, the most appropriate collaboration mechanisms for supporting this interaction are not immediately clear. In this article, we present design considerations for asynchronous collaboration in visual analysis environments, highlighting issues of work parallelization, communication, and social organization. These considerations provide a guide for the design and evaluation of collaborative visualization systems.
- Pirolli P, Card SK. Information foraging. Psychological Review 1999; 106: 643-675.Google Scholar
- Pirolli P, Card SK. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis (McLean, VA) MITRE: 2005.Google Scholar
- Thomas JJ, Cook, KA (Eds). Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Press: New York, 2005.Google Scholar
- Dorling D, Barford A, Newman A. Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2006; 12: 757-764. Google Scholar
- Dietz PH, Leigh DL. DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Orlando, FL) ACM: New York, NY, 2001; 219-226. Google Scholar
- General Dynamics. Command post of the future. {WWW document} http://www.gdc4s.com/content/detail.cfm?item= 2a58f8e2-ef2b-4bbl-9251-42ee4961dd7f (accessed 28 November 2007).Google Scholar
- Agrawala M, Beers A, Froehlich B, Hanrahan P, MacDowall P, Bolas M. The two-user responsive workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space. ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH'97) (Los Angeles, CA) ACM: New York, NY, 1997; 27-332. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anupam V, Bajaj CL, Schikore D, Schikore M. Distributed and collaborative visualization. IEEE Computer 1994; 27: 37-43. Google Scholar
- Brodlie KW, Duce DA, Gallop JR, Walton JPRB, Wood JD. Distributed and collaborative visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 2004; 23: 223-251.Google Scholar
- Chuah MC, Roth S. Visualizing common ground. Information Visualization (IV) (London, UK) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2003; 365-372. Google Scholar
- Benko H, Ishak EW, Feiner S. Collaborative mixed reality visualization of an archaeological excavation. IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2004) (Arlington, VA) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2004; 132-140. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chui Y-P, Heng P-A. Enhancing view consistency in collaborative medical visualization systems using predictive-based attitude estimation. First IEEE International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality (MIAR '01) (Hong Kong) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2001; 292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viégas FB, Wattenberg M. Communication-minded visualization: a call to action. IBM Systems Journal 2006; 45: 801-812. Google Scholar
- Benbunan-Fich R, Hiltz SR, Turoff M. A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems Archive 2003; 34: 457-469. Google Scholar
- Heer J, Viégas F, Wattenberg M. Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07) (San Jose, CA) ACM: New York, NY, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spotfire Decision Site Posters. {WWW document} http:// spotfire.com/products/decisionsite_posters.cfm (accessed 28 November 2007).Google Scholar
- Swivel. {WWW document} http://www.swivel.com (accessed 28 November 2007).Google Scholar
- Viégas FB, Wattenberg M, van Ham F, Kriss J, McKeon M. Many eyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (InfoVis'07) 2007; 13: 1121-1128. Google Scholar
- Wikimapia. {WWW document} http://wikimapia.org (accessed 28 November 2007).Google Scholar
- Benkler Y. Coase's penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal 2002; 112: 369-446.Google Scholar
- Card SK, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision To Think. Morgan-Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, 1999. Google Scholar
- Heer J, Agrawala M. Software design patterns for information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2006; 12: 853-860. Google Scholar
- Russell DM, Stefik MJ, Pirolli P, Card SK. The cost structure of sensemaking. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'93) (Amsterdam, Netherlands) ACM: New York, NY, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pirolli P. Social information foraging. Information Foraging: Adaptive Interaction with Information, Chapter 8. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
- Dourish M, Chalmers M. Running out of space: models of information navigation. Human Computer Interaction (HCI'94) (Glasgow, UK) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994.Google Scholar
- Zhang J, Norman DA. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 1994; 18: 87-122.Google Scholar
- von Ahn L. Games with a purpose. IEEE Computer 2006; 39: 92-94. Google Scholar
- Wright W, Schroh D, Proulx P, Skaburskis A, Cort B. The sandbox for analysis: concepts and evaluation. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06) (Montreal, Quebec) ACM: New York, NY, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brennan SE, Mueller K, Zelinsky G, Ramakrishnan IV, Warren DS, Kaufman A. Toward a multi-analyst, collaborative framework for visual analytics. IEEE Symposium of Visual Analytics Science and Technology (Baltimore, MD) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Billman D, Convertino G, Shrager J, Pirolli P, Massar J. Collaborative intelligence analysis with CACHE and its effects on information gathering and cognitive bias. Human Computer Interaction Consortium Workshop (Frasier, CO) 2006.Google Scholar
- Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N. The Zeno argumentation framework. Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Melbourne, Australia) ACM Press: New York, NY, 1997; 10-18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine RM and Teasley SD (Eds). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. APA Books: Washington, 1991; 127-149.Google Scholar
- Clark HH, Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 1986; 22: 1-39.Google Scholar
- Brennan SE. How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In: Trueswell J and Tanenhaus M (Eds). Approaches to Studying World-Situated Language Use: Bridging the Language-as-Product and Language-as-Action Traditions. MIT Press: Cambridge, 2005; 95-129.Google Scholar
- Gergle D, Kraut RE, Fussell SR. Language efficiency and visual technology: minimizing collaborative effort with visual information. Journal of Language & Social Psychology 2004; 23: 491-517.Google Scholar
- Wattenberg M, Kriss J. Designing for social data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2006; 12: 549-557. Google Scholar
- Carroll J, Rosson MB, Convertino G, Ganoe CH. Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with Computers 2005; 18: 21-46. Google Scholar
- Dourish P, Belotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, ON) ACM: New York, NY, 1992; 107-114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brush AJ, Bargeron D, Grudin J, Gupta A. Notification for shared annotation of digital documents. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02) (Minneapolis, MN) ACM: New York, NY, 2002. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hill WC, Hollan JD, Wroblewski D, McCandless T. Edit wear and read wear. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'92) (Monterey, CA) ACM: New York, NY, 1992; 3-9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Willett W, Heer J, Agrawala M. Scented Widgets: improving navigation cues with embedded visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2007; 13: 1129-1136. Google Scholar
- Clark HH. Pointing and placing. In: Kita S (Ed). Pointing where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Erlbaum: London, 2003; 243-268.Google Scholar
- Hill WC, Hollan JD. Deixis and the future of visualization excellence. IEEE Visualization (San Diego, CA) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2007; 314-319. Google Scholar
- Becket RA, Cleveland WS. Brushing scatterplots. Technometrics 1987; 29: 127-142. Google Scholar
- Martin AR, Ward MO. High dimensional brushing for interactive exploration of multivariate data. IEEE Visualization (Atlanta, GA) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 1995; 271-278. Google Scholar
- Ahlberg C, Shneiderman B. Visual information seeking: tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'94) (Boston, MA) ACM: New York, NY, 1994; 313-317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang D, Rundensteiner EA, Ward MO. Analysis guided visual exploration to multivariate data. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (Sacramento, CA) IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2007. Google Scholar
- Clark HH, Schreuder R, Buttrick S. Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983; 22: 245-258.Google Scholar
- Heer J. Socializing visualization. CHI 2006 Workshop on Social Visualization (Montreal, Quebec) ACM: New York, NY, 2006.Google Scholar
- Ling K, Beenen G, Ludford P, Wang X, Chang K, Cosley D, Frankowski D, Terveen L, Rashid AM, Resnick P, Kraut R. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 10 (http://jcmc.indiana.edu/).Google Scholar
- Cheshire C. Selective Incentives and Generalized Information Exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly 2007; 70: 82-100.Google Scholar
- Caillois R. Man, Play, and Games. Free Press of Glencoe: Glencoe, IL, 1961.Google Scholar
- Salen K, Zimmerman E. Rules of Play: Fundamentals of Game Design. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2003. Google Scholar
- Mohammed S. Toward an understanding of cognitive consensus in a group decision-making context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2001; 37: 408-425.Google Scholar
- Donath JS. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: Smith M and Kollock P (Eds). Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge: London, 1998.Google Scholar
- Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books: New York, 1959.Google Scholar
- Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 1996; 23: 3-43.Google Scholar
- Sproull L, Kiesler S. Computers, networks, and work. Scientific American 1991; 265: 84-91.Google Scholar
- Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K. The value of reputation on eBay: a controlled experiment. Experimental Economics 2006; 9: 79-101.Google Scholar
- Brooks FP. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1975. Google Scholar
- Hardin R. The free rider problem. In: Zalta EN (Ed). The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. 2003.Google Scholar
- Cummings J. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 2004; 50: 352-364. Google Scholar
- Schultz-Hart S, Frey D, Lüthgens C, Moscovici S. Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000; 78: 655-669.Google Scholar
- Burt RS. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 2004; 110: 349-399.Google Scholar
- Wu F, Huberman BA, Adamic LA, Tyler JR. Information flow in social groups. Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics 2004; 337: 327.Google Scholar
- Golder SA, Huberman BA. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 2006; 32: 198-208. Google Scholar
- Scheff TJ. Toward a sociological model of consensus. American Sociological Review 1967; 32: 32-46.Google Scholar
- Hastie R. Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In: Grofman B and Owen G (eds). Decision Research, Vol. 2, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT 1986; 129-157.Google Scholar
- Gigone D, Hastie R. The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993; 65: 959-974.Google Scholar
- Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds. Random House: New York, 2004. Google Scholar
- Stasser G, Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985; 57: 67-78.Google Scholar
- Eccles R, Kapler T, Harper R, Wright W. Stories in geotime. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (Sacramento, CA) IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics
Recommendations
Collaborative visualization: definition, challenges, and research agenda
Special issue on State of the Field and New Research DirectionsThe conflux of two growing areas of technology - collaboration and visualization - into a new research direction, coLLaborative visualization, provides new research chaLLenges. TechnoLogy now aLLows us to easily connect and collaborate with one another - ...
Harnessing the Information Ecosystem with Wiki-based Visualization Dashboards
We describe the design and deployment of Dashiki, a public website where users may collaboratively build visualization dashboards through a combination of a wiki-like syntax and interactive editors. Our goals are to extend existing research on social ...
Guest Editors' Introduction: Collaborative Visualization
This article introduces a special issue on collaborative visualization. The articles in this issue present ongoing research, covering topics ranging from prototype systems to the fundamental technical challenges of creating successful collaborative ...
Comments