skip to main content
10.1145/1394281.1394304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shape-dependent gloss correction

Published: 09 August 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Visual observation is one of the primary means to interact with the world around us. However, the interplay of geometry, material, and illumination in the perception of objects is still not entirely understood.
It is generally accepted that the shape of objects influences the perception of their material appearance. In this paper we investigate and quantify the influence of shape on gloss perception in a realistic setting, using a general cue combination framework and likelihood analysis. Our results show that this influence can be quantified, and that a simple additive model between the shape cue and the actual gloss cue adequately describes this influence.
This paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the perception of objects, and also enables new applications such as a material selection tool that corrects for the influence of gloss when switching between shapes. This improves the intuitiveness of material selection tools for novices as well as professional artists.

References

[1]
Aida, T. 1997. Glossiness of colored papers and its application to specular glossiness measuring instruments. Systems and Computers in Japan 28, 1, 95--112.
[2]
ASTM. 1999. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, volume 06.01. American Society for Testing and Materials.
[3]
Ben-Artzi, A., Overbeck, R., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2006. Real-time BRDF editing in complex lighting. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3, 945--954.
[4]
Ben-Artzi, A., Egan, K., Ramamoorthi, R., and Durand, F. 2008. A precomputed polynomial representation for interactive BRDF editing with global illumination. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 2, 13:1--13:13.
[5]
Berzhanskaya, J., Swaminathan, G., Beck, J., and Mingolla, E. 2005. Remote effects of highlights on gloss perception. Perception 34, 5, 565--575.
[6]
Brainard, D. H., and Wandell, B. A. 1991. A bilinear model of the illuminant's effect on color appearance. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, M. S. Landy and J. A. Movshon, Eds. MIT Press, 171--186.
[7]
Brainard, D. H. 2004. Color constancy. In The Visual Neurosciences, L. M. Chalupa and J. S. Werner, Eds. MIT Press, 948--961.
[8]
Braje, W. L., and Knill, D. C. 1994. Apparent surface shape influences perceived specular reflectance of curved surfaces. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement 35, 4, 1628.
[9]
Clark, J. J., and Yuille, A. L. 1990. Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. Kluwer.
[10]
Colbert, M., and Křivánek, J. 2007. GPU-based importance sampling. In GPU Gems 3, H. Nguyen, Ed. Addison-Wesley, 459--476.
[11]
Colbert, M., and Křivánek, J. 2007. Real-time shading with filtered importance sampling. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Sketches, ACM, 71.
[12]
Colbert, M., Pattanaik, S., and Křivánek, J. 2006. BRDF-Shop: Creating physically correct bidirectional reflectance distribution functions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 1, 30--36.
[13]
Debevec, P. E. 1998. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes: Bridging traditional and image-based graphics with global illumination and high dynamic range photography. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 98, ACM Press / ACM SIG-GRAPH, New York, M. F. Cohen, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 189--198.
[14]
Dür, A. 2006. An improved normalization for the Ward reflectance model. Journal of Graphics Tools 11, 1, 51--59.
[15]
Eliason, S. R. 1993. Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Logic and Practice. SAGE.
[16]
Ferwerda, J. A., Pellacini, F., and Greenberg, D. P. 2001. A psychophysically-based model of surface gloss perception. In Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, SPIE, 291--301.
[17]
Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., and Adelson, E. H. 2003. Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision 3, 5, 347--368.
[18]
Foster, D. H. 2003. Does colour constancy exist? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 10, 439--443.
[19]
Ho, Y.-X., Landy, M. S., and Maloney, L. T. 2008. Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychological Science 19, 2, 196--204.
[20]
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., and Young, M. 1995. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35, 3, 389--412.
[21]
Maloney, L. T. 2002. Illuminant estimation as cue combination. Journal of Vision 2, 6, 493--504.
[22]
Matusik, W., Pfister, H., Brand, M., and McMillan, L. 2003. Efficient isotropic BRDF measurement. In Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, P. Dutré, F. Suykens, P. H. Christensen, and D. Cohen-Or, Eds., Eurographics, 241--248.
[23]
Ngan, A., Durand, F., and Matusik, W. 2005. Experimental analysis of BRDF models. In Proceedings of the 16th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering 2005, K. Bala and P. Dutré, Eds., Eurographics, 117--126.
[24]
Ngan, A., Durand, F., and Matusik, W. 2006. Image-driven navigation of analytical BRDF models. In Proceedings of the 17th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, T. Akenine-Möller and W. Heidrich, Eds., Eurographics, 399--407.
[25]
Nishida, S., and Shinya, M. 1998. Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science & Vision 15, 12, 2951--2965.
[26]
Obein, G., Knoblauch, K., and Viénot, F. 2004. Difference scaling of gloss: Nonlinearity, binocularity, and constancy. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 711--720.
[27]
Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J. A., and Greenberg, D. P. 2000. Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, K. Akeley, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 55--64.
[28]
Ramamoorthi, R., and Hanrahan, P. 2001. A signal-processing framework for inverse rendering. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 117--128.
[29]
Ramanarayanan, G., Ferwerda, J., Walter, B., and Bala, K. 2007. Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3, 76:1--76:11.
[30]
Sun, X., Zhou, K., Chen, Y., Lin, S., Shi, J., and Guo, B. 2007. Interactive relighting with dynamic BRDFs. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3, 27:1--27:10.
[31]
te Pas, S. F., and Pont, S. C. 2005. A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres. In Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualisation 2005, ACM, 75--81.
[32]
Vangorp, P., Laurijssen, J., and Dutré, P. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3, 77:1--77:9.
[33]
Ward, G. J. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 92) 26, 2, 265--272.
[34]
Xiao, B., and Brainard, D. H. 2006. Color perception of 3D objects: Constancy with respect to variation of surface gloss. In Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualisation 2006, ACM, 63--68.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The effect of shape and illumination on material perceptionACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3450626.345981340:4(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Three Perceptual Dimensions for Specular and Diffuse ReflectionACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/338074117:2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2013)Understanding the role of phase function in translucent appearanceACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/2516971.251697232:5(1-19)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2013
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
August 2008
209 pages
ISBN:9781595939814
DOI:10.1145/1394281
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 August 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cue combination
  2. gloss
  3. material editing
  4. maximum likelihood estimation
  5. shape

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

APGV08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 33 submissions, 58%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The effect of shape and illumination on material perceptionACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3450626.345981340:4(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Three Perceptual Dimensions for Specular and Diffuse ReflectionACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/338074117:2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2013)Understanding the role of phase function in translucent appearanceACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/2516971.251697232:5(1-19)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2013
  • (2013)Gloss perception in painterly and cartoon renderingACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/2451236.245124432:2(1-13)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2013
  • (2013)Toward the soft metrology of surface gloss: A reviewColor Research & Application10.1002/col.2184639:6(559-570)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2013
  • (2011)Perception-motivated interpolation of image sequencesACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/1870076.18700798:2(1-25)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2011
  • (2010)Effects of global illumination approximations on material appearanceACM SIGGRAPH 2010 papers10.1145/1833349.1778849(1-10)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2010
  • (2010)Effects of global illumination approximations on material appearanceACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/1778765.177884929:4(1-10)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2010

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media