skip to main content
10.5555/1400549.1400661acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using simulation to evaluate traffic engineering management services in maritime networks

Published:14 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the critical problems in maritime tactical networks is how to maximize the Quality of Service (QoS) achieved by critical traffic while dealing with mobile and limited-capacity links. As part of a research effort to provide enhanced communications capabilities in a maritime tactical network, a number of traffic-engineering techniques have been investigated using the OPNET discrete-event simulation (DES) tool. In this paper, we describe the model developed to simulate the maritime environment and the impact on network traffic of three traffic-engineering based management services: first, a traffic-monitoring service matches the amount of traffic it produces with its knowledge of the current load of the network; second, a traffic-prioritisation service uses weighted fair queuing (WFQ) to prioritize critical traffic; and finally, an adaptive-routing service uses multi-path labelled switching (MPLS) to divert traffic from overloaded links. The effect of these services on network traffic has been simulated and the results are described in this paper.

References

  1. Kidston, D. and Labbé, I. 2006. "A Service Oriented Framework for Policy-Based Management of Maritime Mobile Networks", MILCOM 2006 (Washington, D.C., 23--25 Oct), 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Auscanzukus. 1999. Multi-National Naval Task Group (MNTG) Final Report, Naval C4 JWID Publication JWID99-R, Washington, DC, Sep.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Auscanzukus. 2003. Maritime Tactical Wide Area Networking (MTWAN), Publication ACP 200, Washington, DC, Jul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jorgenson, M., Reichelt, C., and Johnson, T. 2005. "Operation of the Dynamic TDMA Subnet Relay System with HF Bearers", MILCOM 2005 (Atlantic City, NJ, 17--20 Oct), 338--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holliday, P. 2005. "Techniques for Efficient Network Layer Failover in Maritime Tactical Wide Area Networks (MTWAN)", MILCOM 2005 (Atlantic City, NJ, 17--20 Oct), 52--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sibbald, LCdr. 2004. "MARPAC PacketShaper Trial Hot Wash-Up", MARPAC HQ Presentation N60, Nov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maritime Command Operational Information Network (MCOIN III) web page last accessed June 6, 2007. http://halifax.mda.ca/projects/mcoinpage.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. OPNET web page last accessed February 11, 2008. http://www.opnet.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. NETWARS web page last accessed February 11, 2008. http://www.disa.mil/netwars/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sanchez, M. and Manzoni, P. 2001. "ANEJOS: A Java-based simulator for ad-hoc networks", Future Generation Computer Systems Magazine, 17, No. 5. (March): 573--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Barsaleau D. and Tummala, M. 2004. "Testing of DiffServ Performance over a U.S. Navy Satellite Communication Network", MILCOM 2004, (Monterey, CA, 31 Oct. - 3 Nov), 528--534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Using simulation to evaluate traffic engineering management services in maritime networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader