skip to main content
10.1145/1414471.1414480acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computer usage by young individuals with down syndrome: an exploratory study

Published:13 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we discuss the results of an online survey that investigates how children and young adults with Down syndrome use computers and computer-related devices. The survey responses cover 561 individuals with Down syndrome between the age of four to 21. The survey results suggest that the majority of the children and young adults with Down syndrome can use the mouse to interact with computers, which requires spatial, cognitive, and fine motor skills that were previously believed to be quite challenging for individuals with Down syndrome. The results show great difficulty in text entry using keyboards. Young individuals with Down syndrome are using a variety of computer applications and computer related devices, and computers and computer-related devices play important roles in the life of individuals with Down syndrome. There appears to be great potential in computer-related education and training to broaden existing career opportunities for individuals with Down syndrome, and there needs to be further research on this topic.

References

  1. Abbeduto, L., Pavetto, M., Kesin, E., Weissman, M., Karadottir, S.,O'Brien, A. & Cawthon, S. (2001) The linguistic and cognitive profile of Down syndrome: Evidence from a comparison with fragile X syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice,7, 9--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alm, N., Dye, R., Astell, A., Ellis, M., Gowans, G., and Campbell, J. (2007). Making software accessible for users with dementia. In J. Lazar (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 299--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruni, M. (2006). Fine motor skills for children with Down syndrome(second edition). Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Capone,G., Goyal, P., Ares, W. & Lannigan, E. (2006). Neurobehavioral disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C, 158--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006). Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects--United States, 1999--2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54, 1301--1305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, R., Schwartz, S. & Bird, E.R. (1991). Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome I: Comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1106--1120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chapman, R., Seung, J., Schwartz, S. & Bird, E.R. (1998). Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome II: Production deficits. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 861--873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cohone, T., Baecker, R., Marziali, E., and Mindy, S. (2007). Memories of a life: A design case study for Alzheimer's Disease. In J. Lazar (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 357--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawe, M. (2006). Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fowler, A. (1995). Linguistic variability in persons with Down syndrome. In Nadel, L. & Rosenthal, D., Down Syndrome: Living and Learning in the Community, New York, NY: Wiley--Liss, 121--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hopmann, M. R. & Wilen, E. (1993). Visual and Auditory Processing in Children with Down Syndrome: Individual Differences. Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jarrold, C. & Baddeley, A.D. (2002). Verbal short-term memory in Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45, 531--544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kirijian, A., and Myers, M. (2007). Web fun central: online learning tools for individuals with down syndrome. In J. Lazar (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 195--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumin, L. (2003). Early Comunication Skills in Children with Down Syndrome: A Guide for Parents and Professionals. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumin, L. (2006). Differential diagnosis and treatment of speech sound production problems in individuals with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Quarterly, 8, 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumin, L. (2008). Language intervention to encourage complex use: A clinical perspective. in Roberts, J.E., Chapman, R.S. & Warren, S.F. Speech and language development & intervention in Down syndrome & Fragile X syndrome. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing (193--218).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumin, L. & Adams, J. (2000). Developmental Apraxia of speech and intelligibility in children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Quarterly, 5, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lazar, J. (2007). Introduction to Universal Usability. In Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse User Populations (pp. 1--12). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lazar, J., and Preece, J. (1999). Designing and Implementing Web--Based Surveys. Journal of Computer Information Systems. (4) 63--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, C. (2005). HCI for People with Cognitive Disabilities. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 83, 12--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lloyd, J., Moni, K., and Jobling, A. (2006). Breaking the hype cycle: using the computer effectively with learners with intellectual disabilities. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9(3), 68--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Marcell, M., and Falls, A. (2001). Online data collection with special populations over the world wide web. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(3), 106--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., & Klawe, M. (2004). The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. The Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 407--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Roizen, N. J., Mets, M. B. & Blondis, T. A. (1994) Ophthalmic disorders in children with Down syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 36, 594--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Seale, J. (2002). The use of the personal home page by adults with down's syndrome as a tool for managing identity and friendship. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 142--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Seale, J. (2001). The same but different: the use of the personal home page by adults with down syndrome as a tool for self--presentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 343--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Shott, S. R. (2000). Down syndrome: Common pediatric ear, nose, and throat problems. Down Syndrome Quarterly, 5, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Slatin, J., & Rush, S. (2003). Maximum Accessibility. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutcliffe, A., Fickas, S., Sohlberg, M., Ehlhardt, L. (2003). Investigating the usability of assistive user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 15, 577--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Tartaro, A. (2007). Authorable virtual peers for children with autism. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1677--1680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. U. S. government. (1998) Section 508. Electronic and Infomration Technology, 1998 Admendment to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Retrived on April 2, 2008 at http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Whalen, C., Liden, L., Ingersoll, B., and Liden, S. (2007). Evidence-based computer assisted instruction for autism spectrum disorders. In J. Lazar (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 263--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Winders, P. (1997). Gross motor skills in children with Down syndrome: A guide for parents and professionals. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. World Wide Web Consortium (2008) Web Content Accessiblity Guidelines. Retrieved on April 2, 2008 at http://www.w3.org/waiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, M., Baecker, R., and Richards, B. (2007). Designing a cognitive aid for and with people who have anterograde amnesia. In J. Lazar (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 317--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer usage by young individuals with down syndrome: an exploratory study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Assets '08: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2008
        332 pages
        ISBN:9781595939760
        DOI:10.1145/1414471

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 October 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader