skip to main content
10.1145/142621.142624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A testbed for characterizing dynamic response of virtual environment spatial sensors

Published:01 December 1992Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a testbed and method for characterizing the dynamic response of the type of spatial displacement transducers commonly used in virtual environment (VE) applications. The testbed consists of a motorized rotary swing arm that imparts known displacement inputs to the VE sensor. The experimental method involves a series of tests in which the sensor is displaced back and forth at a number of controlled frequencies that span the bandwidth of volitional human movement. During the tests, actual swing arm angle and reported VE sensor displacements are collected and time stamped. Because of the time stamping technique, the response time of the sensor can be measured directly, independent of latencies in data transmission from the sensor unit and any processing by the interface applications running on the host computer. Analysis of these experimental results allows sensor time delay and gain characteristics to be determined as a function of input frequency. Results from tests of several differnt VE spatial sensors (Ascension, Logitech, and Polhemus) are presented here to demonstrate use of the testbed and method.

References

  1. Astrom, KJ., and Wittenmark, B. (1984). Computer Controlled Systems, Theory and Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Burdea, G.C., Dunn, S.M, Immcndorf, C.H., and Mallik, M. (1991). Real-time sensing of tooth position for dental digital subtraction radiography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-38 (4), 366-378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bryson, S. (1992). Measurement and calibration of static distortion of position data from 3D trackers. SPIE Conference on Stereoscopic Displays and Applications Iii, San Jose CA. SPIE paper 16694)9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryson, S., and Fisher, S.S. (1990). Defining, modelling and measuring system lag in virtual environments. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, Proceedings SPIE 1256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Durlach, N.L, Pew, R.W., Aviles, W.A., DiZio, P.A., and Zeltzer, D.L., eds. (1992). Virtual Environment Technology for Training (VEIT). The Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Research Consortium (VETREC). Bolt, Bcranek, and Newman Report 7661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, S.R. (1991). The nature and origin of virtual environments: a bibliographical essay. Computing Systems in Engineering, 2 (4) 321-347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Freund, H.-J., Hefter, H., Homberg, V., and Reiners, K. (1984). Determinants of tremor rate. In Findlcy, L.J., and Capildeo, R., eds., Movement Disorders: Tremor. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 195-204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Held, R., F_.fsathiou, A., and Greene, M. (1966). Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. J. exp. Psychol., 72 (6) 887- 891.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirose, M., Kijima, R., Sato, Y., and Ishii, T. (1990). A study of modification of actual environment by see-through HMD (in Japanese). Proceedings, Sixth Symposium on Human Interface, Tokyo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Liang, J., Shaw, C., and Green, M. (1991). On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment. Proceedings, UIST'91 4th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 19-25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ogata, K. (1970). Modern Control Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englcwood Cliffs, NI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Oman, C.M. (1991). Sensory conflict in motion sickness: an Observer Theory approach. In Pictorial Communication in Real and Virtual Environments, S.R. Ellis, ed., Taylor and Francis, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Polhemus Navigation Sciences (1992). Technical Note: Latencym 3SPACEr Magnetrakr, Tracker, Digitizer and Isotrakr, Colchester VT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheridan, T.B., and FcrreU, W.R. (1963). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Trans. hum. Factors Electron., HFE-4 (I), 25-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tharp, G., Liu, A., and Stark, L.W. (1992). Timing considerations in helmet mounted display performance. SPIE Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display III, San Jose CA. SPIE paper 1666-56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A testbed for characterizing dynamic response of virtual environment spatial sensors

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            UIST '92: Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
            December 1992
            216 pages
            ISBN:0897915496
            DOI:10.1145/142621
            • Chairmen:
            • Jock Mackinlay,
            • Mark Green

            Copyright © 1992 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 December 1992

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            UIST '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader