ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A research program to assess user perceptions of group work support
Full text PdfPdf (951 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages: 99 - 106  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-513-5
Authors
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/142750.142765
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Computer support for group work is a technological innovation receiving considerable attention from developmental researchers. This paper reports the preliminary results from two surveys which assessed user perceived needs for various types of group work support. The instruments, distributed to managers and professionals in a variety of organizations, described group support scenarios and associated functions/tools and asked for an assessment of their usefulness to one of the respondent's organizational work groups. Support for between meetings group work was perceived to be more useful than support for either face to face or electronic meetings. Common single user tools were generally perceived to be more useful than multi-user group tools. Individual differences and implications are addressed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Davis, F. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (Sept. 1989), 319-340.
 
4
 
5
 
6
DeSanctis, G., Poole, M., Lewis, H. & Desharnais, G. Using computing to improve the quality team process: Some initial observations from the IRS-Minnesota project. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr. (F_A.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1991, Vol 3 750-757.
 
7
8
 
9
Gray, P., Alter, S., Dickson, G., DeSanctis, G., Harris, S., Johansen, R., Kraemer, K., Olfman, L., & Vogel, D. Report to the ISDP project on research issues in GDSS. In Stohr, E. & Konsynski, B. (Exls.) The Information Systems and Decision Processes Project, Los Alamitos, CA, ~ Computer Society Press, in press.
 
10
Greif, I. (Ed). Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 86). Austin, Texas (1986), ACM, New York.
11
12
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
McGrath, J. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
Suchman, L. & Tatar, D. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 88). Portland, Oregon, ACM, New York, 1988.
 
22
 
23
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
John Satzinger: colleagues
Lorne Olfman: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: