Being online, living offline: the influence of social ties over the appropriation of social network sites

ABSTRACT

Research on social network sites has examined how people integrate offline and online life, but with a particular emphasis on their use by friendship groups. We extend earlier work by examining a case in which offline ties are non-existent, but online ties strong. Our case is a study of bodybuilders, who explore their passion with like-minded offline 'strangers' in tightly integrated online communities. We show that the integration of offline and online life supports passion-centric activities, such as bodybuilding.

References

1. Beer, D. Social network(ing) sites-revisiting the story so far: A response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 2 (2008), 516--529.
2. boyd, d. Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1279--1282.
3. boyd, d. Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11, 12 (2006). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/
4. boyd, d. Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. in D. Buckingham ed. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (2008), 119--142.
5. boyd, d. and Ellison, N. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1 (2007), 210--230.
6. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I. and Landay, J. A. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 457--466.
7. Consolvo, S., Paulos, E. and Smith, I. Mobile persuasion for everyday behavior change. in B. Fogg and D. Eckles eds. Mobile persuasion: 20 perspectives on the future of behavior change, Stanford Captology Media, Stanford, CA, (2007), 77--86.
8. Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. L. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE, Los Angeles, CA, 2008.
9. Donath, J. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1 (2007), 231--251.
10. Donath, J. and boyd, d. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 4 (2004), 71--82.
11. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. A. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.
12. Eyck, A., Geerlings, K., Karimova, D., Meerbeek, B., Wang, L., Ijsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Roersma, M. and Westerink, J. Effect of a Virtual Coach on Athletes' Motivation. Proc. Persuasive 2006, Springer (2006), 158--161.
13. Fogg, B. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2002.
14. Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18, 1 (2006), 59--82.
15. Hausenblas, H. A., Brewer, B. W. and Van Raalte, J. L. Self-presentation and exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 1 (2004), 3--18.
16. Joinson, A. N. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1027--1036.
17. Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J. and Biddle, R. Investigating social software as persuasive technology. Proc. Persuasive 2006, Springer (2006), 104--107.
18. Kim, K.-H. and Yun, H. Cying for me, Cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1 (2007), 298--318.
19. Lampe, C. A., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 167--170.
20. Leary, M. R. Self-presentational processes in exercise and sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 4 (1992), 339--351.
21. Lin, J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G. and Strub, H. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. Proc. UbiComp 2006, Springer (2006), 261--278.
22. Markham, A. N. The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. in N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, (2005), 793--820.
23. Monaghan, L. F. Bodybuilding, drugs, and risk. Routledge, New York, 2001.
24. Mueller, F. F., Agamanolis, S. and Picard, R. Exertion interfaces: Sports over a distance for social bonding and fun. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 561--568.
25. Mueller, F. F., Stevens, G., Thorogood, A., O'Brien, S. and Wulf, V. Sports over a distance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 8 (2007), 633--645.
26. Neuman, W. L. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 2006.
27. Ploderer, B., Howard, S., Thomas, P. and Reitberger, W. "Hey world, take a look at me!": Appreciating the human body on social network sites. Proc. Persuasive 2008, Springer (2008), 245--248.
28. Segerstahl, K. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Distributed user experience in persuasive technology environments. Proc. Persuasive 2007, Springer (2007), 80--91.
29. Smith, D. Psychology and bodybuilding. in J. Dosil ed. The sport psychologist's handbook: A guide for sport-specific performance enhancement, Wiley, Chichester (2005), 617--639.
30. Smith, D. and Hale, B. Exercise-dependence in bodybuilders: Antecedents and reliability of measurement. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 45, 3 (2005), 401--409.
31. Tanis, M. Online social support groups. in A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes and U.-D. Reips eds. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, (2007), 139--153.
32. Wright, S., Grogan, S. and Hunter, G. Motivations for anabolic steroid use among bodybuilders. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 4 (2000), 566--571.
33. Zajonc, R. B. Social facilitation. Science, 149 (1965), 269--274.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing