Understanding the implications of social translucence for systems supporting communication at work

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe a study that explored the implications of the Social Translucence framework for designing systems that support communications at work. Two systems designed for communicating availability status were empirically evaluated to understand what constitutes a successful way to achieve Visibility of people's communicative state. Some aspects of the Social Translucence constructs: Visibility, Awareness and Accountability were further operationalized into a questionnaire and tested relationships between these constructs through path modeling techniques. We found that to improve Visibility systems should support people in presenting their status in a contextualized yet abstract manner. Visibility was also found to have an impact on Awareness and Accountability but no significant relationship was seen between Awareness and Accountability. We argue that to design socially translucent systems it is insufficient to visualize people's availability status. It is also necessary to introduce mechanisms stimulating mutual Awareness that allow for maintaining shared, reciprocical knowledge about communicators' availability state, which then can encourage them to act in a socially responsible way.

References

1. www.phidgets.com.
2. Adamczyk, P.D. and Bailey, B. P., If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. in CHI, (2004), ACM Press, 271--278.
3. Aoki, P. M. and Woodruff, A. Making Space for Stories: Ambiguity in the Design of Personal Communication Systems CHI, ACM Press, 2005, 181--190.
4. Avrahami, D. and Hudson, S. E., Communication characteristics of instant messaging: effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships. in CSCW, (2006), ACM Press, 505--514.
5. Bailey, B. P. and Konstan, J. A. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4). 685--708.
6. Begole, J. B., Matsakis, N. E. and Tang, J. C., Lilsys: Sensing Unavailability. in CSCW, (2004), 511--514.
7. Begole, J. B., Tang, J. C. and Hill, R., Rhythm modelling, visualizations and applications. in UIST, (2003), ACM Press, 11--20
8. Boehner, K. and Hancock, J. T., Advancing ambiguity. in CHI, (2006), ACM Press, 103--106.
9. Boyle, M. and Greenberg, S. The language of privacy: Learning from video media space analysis and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12 (2). 328--370.
10. Buxton, W. Space-function integration and ubiquitous media. DOM Publications. 248--271.
11. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A diary study of task switching and interruptions. in CHI, (2004), ACM Press, 175--182.
12. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W. A. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (1). 59--83.
13. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E., Atkeson, C. G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J. C. and Yang, J. Predicting human interruptability with sensors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12 (1). 119--146.
14. Fogarty, J., Lai, J. and Christensen, J. Presence versus availability: the design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61 (3). 299--317.
15. Fransella, F., Bell, R. and Bannister, D. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. Wiley, 2003.
16. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-GRAPH: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16 (109).
17. Gefen, D., Straub, D. and Boudreau, M. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Structural Equation Modeling, 4 (7).
18. Goffman, E. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behavior. Random House Inc, 1967.
19. Gonzalez, V. M. and Mark, G., Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. in CSCW, (2005), Springer, 143--162.
20. Gonzalez, V. M. and Mark, G., Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness. in CHI, (2004), ACM Press, 113--120.
21. Hsieh, H. F. and Shannon, S. E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9).
22. McEwan, G. and Greenberg, S. Community Bar: Designing for Awareness and Interaction. in GROUP (2005), ACM Press, 21--30.
23. Milewski, A. E. and Smith, T. M. Providing Presence Cues to Telephone Users in CSCW, (2000). ACM Press, 89--96.
24. O'Malley, C. E., Draper, S. W. and Riley, M. S. Constructive Interaction: A Method for Studying Human-Computer-Human Interaction in INTERACT (1984). 269--274.
25. Palen, L. and Dourish, P., Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. in CHI, (2003), ACM Press 129--136.
26. Perlow, L. A. The Time Famine: Toward Sociology of Work Time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1). 57--59.
27. Romero, N., McEwan, G. and Greenberg, S., A Field Study of Community Bar: (Mis)-matches between Theory and Practice. in GROUP, (2007), ACM Press, 89--98.
28. Romero, N., Szostek, A. M., Kaptein, M. and Markopoulos, P., Behaviours and Preferences when Coordinating Mediated Interruptions: Social and System influence. in ECSCW, Springer, 351--370.
29. Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychology Bulletin, 86 (2). 420--428.
30. Tang, J. C. Approaching and leave-taking: Negotiating contact in computer-mediated communication. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14 (1).
31. Tang, J. C., Isaacs, E. A. and Rua, M. Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions. in CSCW (1994) ACM Press. 23--34.
32. Tang, J. C., Yankelovich, N., Begole, J., Kleek, M. V., Li, F. and Bhalodia, J., ConNexus to awarenex: extending awareness to mobile users. in CHI, (2001), ACM Press, 221--228
33. www.twitter.com

Index Terms

• Applied computing