Finding regional co-location patterns for sets of continuous variables in spatial datasets

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a novel framework for mining regional co-location patterns with respect to sets of continuous variables in spatial datasets. The goal is to identify regions in which multiple continuous variables with values from the wings of their statistical distribution are co-located. A co-location mining framework is introduced that operates in the continuous domain and which views regional co-location mining as a clustering problem in which an externally given fitness function has to be maximized. Interestingness of co-location patterns is assessed using products of z-scores of the relevant continuous variables. The proposed framework is evaluated by a domain expert in a case study that analyzes Arsenic contamination in Texas water wells centering on regional co-location patterns. Our approach is able to identify known and unknown regional co-location patterns, and different sets of algorithm parameters lead to the characterization of Arsenic distribution at different scales. Moreover, inconsistent colocation sets are found for regions in South Texas and West Texas that can be clearly attributed to geological differences in the two regions, emphasizing the need for regional co-location mining techniques. Moreover, a novel, prototype-based region discovery algorithm named CLEVER is introduced that uses randomized hill climbing, and searches a variable number of clusters and larger neighborhood sizes.

References

1. Achtert, E., Böhm, C., Kriegel, H., Kröger, P., and Zimek, A. 2006. Deriving Quantitative Models for Correlation Clusters. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 2006). KDD '06. ACM, New York, NY, 4--13.
2. Aggarwal, C. C., Procopiuc, C. M., and Yu, P. S. 2002. Finding Localized Associations in Market Basket Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 14, 51--62.
3. Aumann, Y., and Lindell, Y. 1999. A Statistical Theory For Quantitative Association Rules. In Proc. of the 5th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. KDD '99. ACM, New York, NY, 261--270.
4. Brimicombe, A. J. 2005. Cluster Detection in Point Event Data Having Tendency Towards Spatially Repetitive Events. In the 8th Intl. Conf. on GeoComputation.
5. Calders, T., Goethals, B., and Jaroszewicz, S. 2006. Mining Rank-Correlated Sets of Numerical Attributes. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. KDD '06. ACM, New York, NY, 96--105.
6. Choo, J., Jiamthapthaksin, R., Chen, C., Celepcikay, O., Giusti, C., and Eick, C. F. 2007. MOSAIC: A Proximity Graph Approach to Agglomerative Clustering. In Proc. of the 9th Intl. Conf. on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK' 07.
7. Cougar^2: Data Mining and Machine Learning Framework, https://cougarsquared.dev.java.net/.
8. Data Mining and Machine Learning Group, University of Houston, http://www.tlc2.uh.edu/dmmlg.
9. Ding, W., Eick, C. F., Wang, J., and Yuan, X. 2006. A Framework for Regional Association Rule Mining in Spatial Datasets. 2006. In Proc. of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Data Mining. ICDM'06.
10. Ding, W., Jiamthapthaksin, R., Parmar, R., Jiang, D., Stepinski, T., and Eick, C. F. 2008. Towards Region Discovery in Spatial Datasets. In Proc. of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Osaka, Japan, May 2008). PAKDD '08.
11. Eick, C. F., Vaezian, B., Jiang, D., and Wang, J. 2006. Discovering of Interesting Regions in Spatial Data Sets Using Supervised Clustering. In Proc. of the 10th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. PKDD '06.
12. Eick, C. F., Zeidat, N., and Zhao, Z. Supervised Clustering --- Algorithms and Benefits. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Tools with AI (Boca Raton, Florida, November 2004). ICTAI '04, 774--776.
13. Getis, A., and Ord, J. K. 1996. Local Spatial Statistics: an Overview. In Spatial analysis: modeling in a GIS environment, Cambridge, GeoInformation International. (Cambridge, 1996), 261--277.
14. Huang, Y., Pei, J., and Xiong, H. 2006. Mining Co-Location Patterns with Rare Events from Spatial Data Sets. Geoinformatica 10 (3), 239--260.
15. Huang, Y., and Zhang, P. 2006. On the Relationships between Clustering and Spatial Co-location Pattern Mining. In Proc. of the 18th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Tools with Artificial intelligence. ICTAI. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 513--522.
16. Jaroszewicz, S. 2008. Minimum Variance Associations---Discovering Relationships in Numerical Data. In Proc. of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, (Osaka, Japan, May 2008). PAKDD '08.
17. Kaufman, L., and Rousseeuw, P. J. 2005. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.
18. Kulldorff, M. 2001. Prospective Time Periodic Geographical Disease Surveillance Using a Scan Statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 164, 6--72.
19. Lloyd, S. P. 1982. Least Squares Quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 28, 128--137.
20. Ng, R. T., and Han, J. 1994. Efficient and Effective Clustering Methods for Spatial Data Mining. In Proc. of the 20th Intl. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 144--155.
21. Ord, J. K., and Getis, 1995. A. Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application. Geographical Analysis, 27(4), 286--306.
22. Scanlon, B. R., Nicot, J. P. et al. 2005. Evaluation of Arsenic Contamination in Texas. Technical report prepared for TCEQ, under contract no. UT-08-5-70828.
23. Shekhar, S., and Huang, Y. 2001. Discovering Spatial Co-location Patterns: A Summary of Results. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Symp. on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, Springer-Verlag, London, 236--256.
24. Smedley, P. L., and Kinniburgh, D. G. 2002. A Review of the Source, Behavior and Distribution of Arsenic in Natural Waters. Applied Geochemistry 17, 517--568.
25. Smith, A. H. et al. 1992. Cancer Risks From Arsenic in Drinking Water. Environmental Health Perspectives, 97, 259--267.
26. Srikant, R., and Agrawal, R. 1996. Mining Quantitative Association Rules in Large Relational Tables. SIGMOD Rec. 25(2), 1--12.
27. Texas Water Development Board, http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/home/index.asp
28. Xiong, H., Shekhar, S., Huang, Y., Kumar, V., Ma, X., and Yoo, J. S. 2004. A Framework for Discovering Co-location Patterns in Data Sets with Extended Spatial Objects. In Proc. of SIAM Intl. Conf. on Data Mining (SDM).
29. Yoo, J. S., and Shekhar, S. 2006. A Join-less Approach for Mining Spatial Co-location Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE), 18.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Machine learning

    • Learning paradigms

      • Unsupervised learning

        • Cluster analysis

• Human-centered computing

  • Visualization

    • Visualization application domains

      • Geographic visualization

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Data mining

    • Spatial-temporal systems