skip to main content
10.1145/1500879.1500955acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integration of IT strategy and enterprise architecture models

Published:12 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper provides the rationale and concept for integration of models and modeling objects of Enterprise Architecture and IT Strategies. The cohesion between and within Business and IT is achieved by means of services. Among other applications this concept justifies inclusion of Enterprise Architecture as perspective in Balanced Scorecards used for IT Strategy management and measurement. Then the relations between BSC objects and EA objects can be maintained in a single modeling repository thus providing an integrated environment for methods, processes, models and variants of objects and enabling holistic strategy, project and architecture management.

References

  1. COBIT® 4.1, 2007, Control Objectives for IT, IT Governance InstituteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. M. Brown, and A. W. Gatian, Strategic Information Systems and Financial Performance,. Journal of Management, Information Systems (11:4), 1995, pp. 215--248 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. C. Henderson, and N. Venkatraman, Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations,. IBM Systems Journal (32:1), 1993, pp. 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Zachman. "A framework for information systems architecture" IBM Systems Journal, 1987, Vol 26, No, 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. F. Sowa, J. A. ZachmanExtending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal archive, 1992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. The Open Group, The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), Enterprise Edition 8.1, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Service Management - ITIL® (IT Infrastructure Library) Version 3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. OGC, Managing Successful Project with PRINCE2, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Lankhorst, ArchiMate Language Primer, Telematica Institute, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Lankhorst, Viewpoints Functionality and Examples, Telematica Institute, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, Translating Strategy Into Action - The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Bricknall, G. Darrell, H. Nilsson, K. Pessi, Aligning IT Strategy with Business Strategy through the Balanced Scorecard, 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. A. Reo, The Balanced IT Scorecard - Quality of Strategy vs. Strategy Execution, European Software Institute, 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Van Grembergen, Balansed Scorecard and IT Governance Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W. Van Grembergen, S. Haes, Measuring and Improving IT Governance Through the Balanced Scorecard Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. Van Grembergen, Measuring and Demonstrating the Value of ITGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. F. Rico, A Framework for Measuring the ROI of Enterprise ArchitectureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection Guide, Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developers, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Broadbent; P. Weill; Leveraging the New Infrastructure-How Market Leaders Capitalise on Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Gold, Total quality management in information services -- IS measures: a balancing act," Research Note. Ernst & Young Center for Information Technology and Strategy, Boston, 1992Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. L. Willcocks, Information Management. The evaluation of information systems investments. Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Survey of IT Governance Institute, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Y. Chan. IT value: the great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. McDavid, The Business-IT Gap: A Key ChallengeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Charan & G. Colvin, Why CEO's Fail, Fortune Magazine, 21 June 1998Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Software Engineering Institute, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.2, August 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ISO, ISO/IEC 42010:2007- Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systemsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Integration of IT strategy and enterprise architecture models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CompSysTech '08: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing
        June 2008
        598 pages
        ISBN:9789549641523
        DOI:10.1145/1500879

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader