skip to main content
10.1145/1502650.1502713acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Musicsim: integrating audio analysis and user feedback in an interactive music browsing ui

Published:08 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In music information retrieval (MIR), there are two main research directions, which are based either on a folder hierarchy and metadata, or on the actual acoustic content. We believe that both content-based and hierarchy-based retrieval have their respective strengths for browsing and organizing music collections, and that the integration of content analysis techniques in metadata-based media UIs can lead to more powerful UIs. In this paper we present a prototype, in which audio analysis techniques and user feedback are integrated into an interactive UI for browsing and organizing large music collections. We also provide visual assistance to support non-visual perception of music. We discussed our system with test users and received encouragement as well as valuable suggestions for future re-search.

References

  1. Kim, J.Y. and Belkin, N. Categories of Music Description and Search Terms and Phrases Used by Non-Music Experts. Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Paris, France, 2002). ISMIR '02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vignoli F. Digital Music Interaction concepts: a user study. Proc. of the 5 th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Barcelona, Spain, 2004). ISMIR '04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank B., Crysta M., and Gunnar H. Personal vs. commercial content: the similarities between consumer use of photos and music. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2006). CHI '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brown, B., Geelhoed, E. and Sellen, A. The Use of Conventional and New Music Media: Implications for Future Technologies. 8th IFIP TC.13 conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Tokyo, Japan, 2001). INTERACT '01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, S, Reeves, N., and Britland, M. An Ethnographic Study of Music Information Seeking: Implications for the Design of a Music Digital Library. Proc. of ACM/IEEE--CS joint conference on Digital libraries (Houston, TX, USA, 2003). JCDL '03. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Downie, J. S., and Cunningham, S.J. Toward a Theory of Music Information Retrieval Queries: System Design Implications. Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Paris, France, 2002). ISMIR '02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pampalk, E. Islands of Music: Analysis, Organization, and Visualization of Music Archives. Journal of the Austrian Soc. for Artificial Intelligence, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Knees, P., Schedl, M., Pohle, T., et al. An Innovative Three-Dimensional User Interface for Exploring Music Collections Enriched with Meta-Information from the Web. Proc. of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia (Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2006).MULTIMEDIA '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gulik, R van, Vignoli, F. Visual Playlist Generation on the Artist Map. Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (London, UK, 2002). ISMIR '05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Torrens, M., Hertzog, P., Arcos JL. Visualizing and exploring personal music libraries. Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Barcelona, Spain, 2004). ISMIR '04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Goto, M., Goto, T. Musicream: New Music Playback Interface for Streaming, Sticking, Sorting, and Recalling Musical Pieces. Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (London, UK, 2002). ISMIR '05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilliges, O., Holzer, P., Kluber, R., Butz, A. AudioRadar: A metaphorical visualization for the navigation of large music collections. Proc. of the International Symposium on Smart Graphics (Vancouver, Canada, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Prefuse, interactive information sisualization toolkit: http://www.prefuse.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. jAudio: Towards a standardized extensible audio music feature extraction. System,Course Paper. http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~cmckay/papers/musictech/jAudio.pdf, McGill University, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., et al. Analysis of a simple k-means clustering algorithm. 16th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (Hong Kong, China, 2000). SoCG '00. 100--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pampalk, E., Rauber, A., Merkl, D. Content-based Organization and Visualization of Music Archives. Proc. of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia .MULTIMEDIA '02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Cunningham SJ, Bainbridge D., Falconer A. 'More of an Art than a Science': Supporting the Creation of Playlists and Mixes. Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Victoria, Canada, 2006). ISMIR '06.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pauws S. PATS: Realization and user evaluation of an automatic playlist generator. Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (Paris, France, 2002). ISMIR '02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Phole T., Pampalk, E., Widmer G. Generating Similarity-based Playlists Using Traveling Salesman Algorithms. Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects ( Madrid, Spain, 2005). DAFx '05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Musicsim: integrating audio analysis and user feedback in an interactive music browsing ui

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Egon L. van den Broek

    Music is omnipresent in modern societies. Consequently, attention to its selection, retrieval, and the maintenance of its collections is increasing. Using MusicSim, the authors introduce a utility to support these tasks. The authors start their paper with a concise, up-to-date overview on the topic. Two main issues are addressed in this paper. First is the clustering of music through combining metadata and content-based (for example, audio) features; however, how this is implemented in MusicSim is not made clear. Second, the authors stress the need "to take the human into the loop." As explained in the paper, this is done through an interactive card-sorting task, which provides relevant feedback to the system. Although MusicSim's rationale is good, the paper omits technical specifications and its implementation seems to lack advancement. Moreover, a thorough evaluation of the system is not described because it would be "beyond the focus of this paper." So, at best, a true evaluation seems to be saved for another paper. Possibly, this paper could have illustrated MusicSim's potential benefits, but, unfortunately, it also fails in this regard. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '09: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2009
      522 pages
      ISBN:9781605581682
      DOI:10.1145/1502650

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 February 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader