skip to main content
10.5555/1509456.1509623acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccadConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using test data to improve IC quality and yield

Published:10 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The complexity of interactions in today's manufacturing processes makes test structures and experiments inadequate as sole drivers of yield-learning and design-for-manufacturing [DfM]. They must be driven by product impact. Product-impact-oriented test-based learning provides insight into the nature of model-hardware mismatches and variability that exist on and impact real products. That insight can be used to drive both parametric and defect-oriented process actions and DfM.

References

  1. M. Ketchen, M. Bhushan and D. Pearson, "High Speed Test Structures for In-Line Process Monitoring and Model Calibration," Intl. Conf. on Microelectronic Test Structures, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Bhushan, A. Gattiker, M. Ketchen and K. Das, "Ring Oscillators for CMOS Process Tuning and Variability Control," IEEE Trans. On Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Ketchen and M. Bhushan, "Product Representative 'At-Speed' Test Structures for CMOS Characterization," IBM Journal of Res. & Dev., Vol. 4/5, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Gattiker, M. Bhushan and M. Ketchen, "Data Analysis Techniques for CMOS Technology Characterization and Product Impact Assessment," Intl. Test Conference, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Gattiker, "Unraveling Variability for Process/Product Improvement," IEEE International Test Conference, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Stine, D. Boning and J. Chung, "Analysis and Decomposition of Spatial Variation in Integrated Circuit Processes and Devices," IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 10, No 1., 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Orshansky, L, Milor and C. Hu, "Characterization of Spatial Intrafield Gate CD Variability, Its Impact on Circuit Performance, and Spatial Mask-Level Correction," IEEE Trans. On Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Abrokwah, P. Chidambaram and D. Boning, "Pattern Based Prediction for Plasma Etch," IEEE Trans. On Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 20, No. 2, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Friedberg, "Spatial Modeling of Gate Length Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization", Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Boning et al., "Variation," IEEE Trans. On Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Wong, et al., "Linewidth Variation Characterization by Spatial Decomposition," Journal of Microlithography, Microlithography, Microfabrication, and Microsystems, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Cain and C. Spanos, "Electrical Linewidth Metrology for Systematic CD Variation Characterization and Causal Analysis," Proceeding of SPIE, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Stamper, T. McDevitt, S. Luce, "Sub-0.25-Micron Interconnection Scaling: Damascene Copper Versus Subtractive Aluminum," Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Rodriguez Montanes, J. Figueras and E. Bruls, "Bridging Defects Resistance Measurements in a CMOS Process," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Rodriguez Montanes, P. Volf and J. Pineda de Gyvez, "Resistance Characterization for Weak Opens," IEEE Design & Test of Computers, Vol. 19, Issue 5, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Gattiker, "IC Failure Mechanisms Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow: Implications from Test to DFM," IEEE Intl. Symp. On Physical Design, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Gattiker, "Well-Targeted Design-for-Manufacturability {DFM} Through Test," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Chakravarty, K. Komeyli, E. Savage, M. Carruthers, B. Stastny, S. Zachariah, "Layout Analysis to Extract Open Nets Caused by Systematic Failure Mechanisms," VLSI Test Symposium, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Vankataraman and S. Drummonds, "POIROT: A Logic Fault Diagnosis Tool and Its Applications," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Bartenstein, D. Heaberlin, L. Huisman and D. Sliwinski, "Diagnosing Combinational Logic Designs Using the Single Location at-a-time (SLAT) Paradigm," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Lavo, I. Hartanto and T. Larrabee, "Multiplets, Models and the Search for Meaning: Improving Per-Test Fault Diagnosis," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Desineni and R. Blanton, "Diagnosis of Arbitrary Defects Using Neighborhood Function Extraction," IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Heaberlin, "The Power of Exhaustive Bridge Diagnosis using IDDQ: Speed, Confidence and Resolution," IEEE Intl. Test Conference, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Using test data to improve IC quality and yield

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICCAD '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
      November 2008
      855 pages
      ISBN:9781424428205

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 November 2008

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate457of1,762submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICCAD '24
      IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design
      October 27 - 31, 2024
      New York , NY , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader