ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Recontamination does not help to search a graph
Full text PdfPdf (1.48 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 40 ,  Issue 2  (April 1993) table of contents
Pages: 224 - 245  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Andrea S. LaPaugh  Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 72,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/151261.151263
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with a game on graphs called graph searching. The object of this game is to clear all edges of a contaminated graph. Clearing is achieved by moving searchers, a kind of token, along the edges of the graph according to clearing rules. Certain search strategies cause edges that have been cleared to become contaminated again. Megiddo et al. [9] conjectured that every graph can be searched using a minimum number of searchers without this recontamination occurring, that is, without clearing any edge twice. In this paper, this conjecture is proved. This places the graph-searching problem in NP, completing the proof by Megiddo et al. that the graph-searching problem is NP-complete. Furthermore, by eliminating the need to consider recontamination, this result simplifies the analysis of searcher requirements with respect to other properties of graphs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
~BRElSCH, R. An intuitive approach to speleotopology. Southwestern Cat:ers (A publication of ~the Southwestern Region of the National Speleological Society) VI, 5 (Dec. 1967), 72-78.
 
3
~ELLIS, J. A., SUDBOROUGH, I. H., AND TURNER, J.S. Graph separation and search number. ~In Proceedings of the Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Compuung. Coordi- ~nated Sci. Lab., Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, I11., 1983, pp. 224 233.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
~MAKEDON, F., PAPADIMITRIOU, C., AND SUDBOROUGH, I.H. Topological bandwidth. SIAM J. ~Al~: Disc. Meth. 6 (1985), 418-444.
 
8
9
 
10
~PARSONS, T.D. Pursuit-evasion in a graph. In Theory and ,4pphcattons of Graphs. Y. Alavi ~ and D. R. Lick, eds. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976, pp. ~ 426-441.
 
11
~PARSONS, T. D. The search number of a connectcd graph. In Proceedtngs of the 9th ~Southeastern Conference on Combinatodcs, Graph Theoly and Cotnputing. Utilitas Mathemat- ~ica Publishing, Winnipeg, Canada, 1978, pp. 549 554.

CITED BY  16
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


REVIEW

"Daniel P. Bovet : Reviewer"

Lapaugh proves the truth of a conjecture raised by Megiddo et al.[1] that the edges of a graph can be cleared by an efficient one-pass algorithm without ever having to reclear an edge already cleared. This places the   more...


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: