skip to main content
10.1145/1514932.1514959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesispdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An automatic optical-simulation-based lithography hotspot fix flow for post-route optimization

Published:29 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, an automatic lithography hotspot fix guidance generation method based on optical simulation engine and a fix flow utilizing this method are proposed. We find that subject to shape changes of original layout, there is strong correlation between the optical intensity maps of pre-OPC and post-OPC layouts. From this fact, we develop a fix action generation method by optimizing optical intensity in terms of polygon changes near a litho hotspot in a pre-OPC layout. Fix guidances as a subset of fix actions of a hotspot can be selected by a greedy method. The fix guidances are used as input to router to fix the hotspots. We integrate this fix guidance generation method with commercial lithography hotspot detection tool to create a post-route lithography hotspot fixing flow and test with industry 65nm designs. Compared with commercial flow, our method has 1.4X~1.9X fix rate with similar run time. The circuit timing impact is negligible in both our flow and industry flow. And our flow will not introduce any new design rule check (DRC) violation.

References

  1. M. Mark. DFM EDA Technology: A Lithographic Perspective, In Proc. IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, pages 90--91, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. M. Schellenberg. Resolution enhancement technology: the past, the present and extension for the future. In Proc. SPIE Microlithography Symposium, Santa Clara, CA, Feb. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Y.-R. Wu, M.-C. Tsai, and T.-C. Wang. Maze Routing with OPC Consideration. In Proc. ASP-DAC, pages 198--203, Shanghai, China, January 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T.-C. Chen and Y.-W. Chang. Multilevel full-chip gridless routing with applications to optical-proximity correction. IEEE Trans.CAD, 26(6):1041--1053, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Mitra, P. Yu and D.-Z. Pan. RADAR: RET-Aware Detailed Routing Using Fast Lithography Simulations. In Proc. DAC, pages 369--372, Anaheim, CA, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M.-C. Tsai, D. Zhang and Z. Tang. Modeling Litho-Constrained Design Layout. In Proc. DAC, pages. 354--357, San Diego, CA, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Roseboom, M. Rossman, F.-C. Chang and P. Hurat. Automated full-chip hotspot detection and removal flow for interconnect layers of cell-based designs. In Proc. SPIE, Vol. 6521, pp. 65210C, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Kong, H. Leunga, V. Raghavan, A. K. Wong and S. Xu Model-assisted Routing for Improved Lithography Robustness. In Proc. SPIE, Vol. 6521, pp. 65210D, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Zhang, S. Tong, A. Miloslavsky, Z. Tang. Router Driven Automated Correction of Lithography Hotspots. In SNUG Taiwan, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. PROLITH (version 9.0), KLA-Tencor Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. W. Liebmann. Layout impact of resolution enhancement techniques: impediment or opportunity? In Proc. ISPD, pages 110--117, 2003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Schellenberg. A Little Light Magic. In IEEE Spectrum, pages 34--39. Sep. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Rai-Choudhury, Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication, Washington: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics. New York: Pergamon, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. E. A. Saleh and M. Rabbani. Simulation of Partially Coherent Imagery in the Space and Frequency Domains and by Modal Expansions. In Appl. Opt. 21, pages 2770--2777, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Y.C. Pati, A.A. Ghazanfarian, and R.F. Pease. Exploiting Structure in Fast Aerial Image Computation for IC Patterns. IEEE Trans. Semi. Mfg., vol.10(1), pages 62--74, Feb 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Calibre, Mentor Graphics Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L.-D. Huang and D. F. Wong. Optical proximity correction (OPC)-friendly maze routing. In Proc. DAC, pages 186--191, San Diego, CA, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Yao, S. Sinha, C. Chiang, X. Hong, and Y. Cai. Efficient process-hotspot detection using range pattern matching. In Proc. ICCAD, pages 625--632, San Jose, CA, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Xu, S. Sinha, and C. C. Chiang. Accurate Detection for Process-Hotspots with Vias and Incomplete Specification. In Proc. ICCAD, San Jose, CA, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T.-C. Chen, G.-W. Liao and Y.-W. Chang. Predictive Formulae for OPC with Applications to Lithography-Friendly Routing. In Proc. DAC, pages 510--515, Anaheim, CA, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Cho, K. Yuan, Y. Ban and D. Z. Pan. ELIAD: Efficient lithography aware detailed router with compact post-OPC printability prediction. In Proc. DAC, pages 504--509, Anaheim, CA, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. PrimeYield LCC, Synopsys Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An automatic optical-simulation-based lithography hotspot fix flow for post-route optimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISPD '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international symposium on Physical design
      March 2009
      208 pages
      ISBN:9781605584492
      DOI:10.1145/1514932

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate62of172submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader