skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518970acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of mobile money-transfer UIs for non-literate and semi-literate users

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the increasing penetration of mobile phones even into poor communities, mobile payment schemes could bring formal financial services to the "unbanked". However, because poverty for the most part also correlates with low levels of formal education, there are questions as to whether electronic access to complex financial services is enough to bridge the gap, and if so, what sort of UI is best.

In this paper, we present two studies that provide preliminary answers to these questions. We first investigated the usability of existing mobile payment services, through an ethnographic study involving 90 subjects in India, Kenya, the Philippines and South Africa. This was followed by a usability study with another 58 subjects in India, in which we compared non-literate and semi-literate subjects on three systems: text-based, spoken dialog (without text), and rich multimedia (also without text). Results confirm that non-text designs are strongly preferred over text-based designs and that while task-completion rates are better for the rich multimedia UI, speed is faster and less assistance is required on the spoken-dialog system.

References

  1. EKO: http://www.eko.co.in/pilot.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Equity Bank : http://www.equitybank.co.ke/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M-PESA: http://www.safaricom.co.ke/index.php?id=228Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GCASH: http://www.GCash.com.ph/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. GSMA Development Fund: http://www.gsmworld.com/developmentfund/report_top20_form.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ITU ICT Eye. http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Reporting/ShowReportFrame.aspx?ReportName=/WTI/CellularSubscribersPublic&RP_intYear=2007&RP_intLanguageID=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. WIZZIT: http://www.WIZZIT.co.za/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Abadzi, H. Improving Adult Literacy Outcomes: Lessons from Cognitive Research for Developing Countries. World Bank, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Boyera, S. The Mobile Web to Bridge the Digital Divide? Paper presented at the IST-Africa Conference 2007, Maputo, Mozambique, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chipchase, J. Literacy, Communication, and Design. Paper presented at the UIAH, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chipchase, J., Persson, P., Piippo, P., Aarras, M.,&Yamamoto, T. Mobile essentials: field study and concepting. Proc. Designing for User eXperience Conference, San Francisco, USA, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chipchase, J. (2005). Understanding Non-Literacy as a Barrier to Mobile Phone Communication. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://research.nokia.com/bluesky/non-literacy-001-2005/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, A. and Reimann, R. About Face 2.0, The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley Publishing Inc. USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Donner, J., and Tellez, Camilo A. (in press). Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption, impact, and use. Asian Journal of Communication 18(4), (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Donner, J. Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A Review of the Literature. The Information Society 24(3), (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Grisedale, S., Graves, M and Grünsteidl, A. Designing a graphical user interface for healthcare workers in rural India, Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, USA, (1997), 471--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Havelock, E. A. Prologue to Greek Literacy. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati Press, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Huenerfauth, M. Developing design recommendations for computer interfaces accessible to illiterate users. Master's thesis, University College Dublin, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivatury, G. Harnessing technology to transform financial services for the poor. Small Enterprise Development 15 (4), (2004), 25--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jones, M., Buchanan, G., Thimbleby, H., and Marsden, G. User interfaces for mobile web devices www9 mobile workshop position paper. Proc. 9th International World Wide Web Conference, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehrman, S. Dialing in. Mobile phones target the world's nonreading poor. Scientific American, 296(5), (2007), 30--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Medhi, I. and Toyama, K. Full-Context Videos for First-Time, Non-Literate PC Users. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Bangalore, India, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Medhi, I., Prasad, A. and Toyama K. Optimal audio-visual representations for illiterate users. International World Wide Web Conference, Canada, (2007), 873--882. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Medhi, I., Sagar A., and Toyama K. Text-Free User Interfaces for Illiterate and Semi-Literate Users. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Berkeley, USA, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Medhi, I.,&Ratan, A. L. Usability test of -bank's biometric-ATM prototype: an evaluation Microsoft Research India. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Parikh, T., Javid, P., Sasikumar, K., Ghosh, K., and Toyama, K. Mobile Phones and Paper Documents: Evaluating a New Approach for Capturing Microfinance Data in Rural India, ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), Montreal, Canada, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Parikh, T. Ghosh K. and Chavan, A. Design Considerations for a Financial Management System for Rural, Semi-literate Users. ACM Conference on Computer Human Interactio, Florida, USA, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Parikh, T. Ghosh K. and Chavan, A. Design Studies for a Financial Management System for Micro-credit Groups in Rural India. ACM Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, Canada, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Plauche, M., Prabaker, M., Text-Free User Interfaces, Working Papers in ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction, Montreal, Canada, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Porteous, D. The enabling environment for mobile banking in Africa. London: DFID. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratan. A. L. and Medhi, I. Eko report: an evaluation. Microsoft Research Technical Report. (2008)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ratan. A. L. Using technology to deliver financial services to low-income households: A preliminary study of Equity Bank and M-PESA customers in Kenya. Microsoft Research Technical Report. (2008)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherwani, J., Ali, N., Mirza, S., Fatma, A., Memon, Y., Karim, M., Tongia, R., Rosenfeld., R. HealthLine: Speech-based Access to Health Information by Low-literate Users. Proc. IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Bangalore, India, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Singh, S. The Digital Packaging of Electronic Money. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Usability and Internationalization. Global and Local User Interfaces, New York: Springer, (2007), 469--475. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Thatcher, A., Mahlangu, S.,&Zimmerman, C. Accessibility of ATMs for the functionally illiterate through icon-based interfaces Behaviour&Information Technology, 25(1), (2006), 65--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Thatcher, A., Shaik, F. and Zimmerman, C. Attitudes of semi-literate and literate bank account holders to the use of automatic teller machines (ATMs). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, (2005), 15--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. UNCTAD, Information Economy Report 2007-2008: Science and Technology for Development - The New Paradigm of ICT, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Walton, M., Vukovic', V. and Marsden, G. 'Visual literacy' as challenge to the internationalisation of interfaces: a study of South African student web users, CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, USA, (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Warschauer, M. Demystifying the Digital Divide. Scientific American 289, no. 2 (April), (2003) 42--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of mobile money-transfer UIs for non-literate and semi-literate users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader