skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518988acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User-created forms as an effective method of human-agent communication

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A key challenge for mixed-initiative systems is to create a shared understanding of the task between human and agent. To address this challenge, we created a mixed-initiative interface called Mixer to aid administrators with automating tedious information-retrieval tasks. Users initiate communication with the agent by constructing a form, creating a structure to hold the information they require and to show context in order to interpret this information. They then populate the form with the desired results, demonstrating to the agent the steps required to retrieve the information. This method of form creation explicitly defines the shared understanding between human and agent. An evaluation of the interface shows that administrators can effectively create forms to communicate with the agent, that they are likely to accept this technology in their work environment, and that the agent's help can significantly reduce the time they spend on repeated information-retrieval tasks.

References

  1. Allen, J., Chambers, N., Ferguson, G., Galescu, L., Jung, H., Swift, M., Taysom, W. PLOW: A Collaborative Task Learning Agent. Proc. of AAAI (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alterman, R., Feinman, A., Introne, J. and Landsman, S. Coordinating Representations in Computer-Mediated Joint Activities. In Proc. of the Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bly, S. and Churchill, E. F. Design through Matchmaking: Technology in Search of Users. Interactions, 6, 2 (March/April 1999), 23--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bresina, J. L. and Morris, P. H. Mixed-Initiative Planning in Space Mission Operations. AI Magazine, 28, 2 (2007), 75--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Burstein, M. H. and Diller, D. E. Cooperative Information Sharing Among Mixed-Initiative Human/Agent Teams. In Proc. of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Burstein, M., Laddaga, R., McDonald, D., Cox, M., Benyo, B., Robertson, P., Hussain, T., Brinn, M. and McDermott, D. POIROT: Integrated Learning of Web Service Procedures. Proc. of AAAI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cypher, A. Eager: Programming Repetitive Tasks by Demonstration. In Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration. A. Cypher (eds). MIT Press, (1993), 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (Sept 1989), 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dix, A., Mancini, R. and Levialdi, S. Communication, Action and History. In Proc. of CHI, (1997) ACM Press, 542--543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E. Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development. In End User Development: Empowering People to Flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2006, 427--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S. E., Atkeson, C. G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J. C. and Yang, J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Freed, M., Carbonell, J., Gordon, G., Hayes, J., Myers, B., Siewiorek, D., Smith, S., Steinfeld, A., Tomasic, A. RADAR: A Personal Assistant that Learns to Reduce Email Overload. In Proc. of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hearst, M. A. Mixed Initiative Interaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14, 5 (1999), 14--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-initiative User Interfaces. In Proc. of CHI, (1999) ACM Press, 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Horvitz, E. Reflections on Challenges and Promises of Mixed-Initiative Interaction. AAAI Magazine, 28(2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosbie, D. S. and Myers, B. A. A System-wide Macro Facility Based on Aggregate Events: A Proposal. In Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration. A. Cypher (eds). MIT Press, 1993, 433--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Leshed, G., Haber, E. M., Matthews, T. and Lau, T. CoScripter: automating&sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise. In Proc. of CHI, (2008) ACM Press, 1719--1728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Malone, T. W., Grant, K. R., Lai, K., Rao, R. and Rosenblitt, D. Semistructured Messages Are Surprisingly Useful for Computer-Supported Coordination. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5, 2 (1987), 115--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Myers, B., Hudson, S. E. and Pausch, R. Past, Present, and Future of User Interface Software Tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 1 (2000), 3--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nardi, B. A. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tecuci, G., Boicu, M. and Cox, M. T. Seven Aspects of Mixed-Initiative Reasoning: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Mixed-Initiative Assistants. AI Magazine, 28, 2 (2007), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tomasic, A., Zimmerman, J., Hargraves, I., McMullen, R. User Constructed Data Integration via Mixed Initiative Design. In Proc. of AAAI, Spring Symposium, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuchinda, R., Szekely, P. and Knoblock, C. A. Building Data Integration Queries by Demonstration. In Proc. of IUI, (2007) ACM Press, 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zimmerman, J., Tomasic, A., Simmons, I., Hargraves, I., Mohnkern, K., Cornwell, J., McGuire, R. VIO: a Mixed-Initiative Approach to Learning and Automating Procedural Update Tasks. In Proc. of CHI, (2007), 1445--1454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zloof, M. M. QBE/OBE: A Language for Office and Business Automation. IEEE Computer, 14, 5 (1981), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User-created forms as an effective method of human-agent communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader