skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519035acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Brain measurement for usability testing and adaptive interfaces: an example of uncovering syntactic workload with functional near infrared spectroscopy

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A well designed user interface (UI) should be transparent, allowing users to focus their mental workload on the task at hand. We hypothesize that the overall mental workload required to perform a task using a computer system is composed of a portion attributable to the difficulty of the underlying task plus a portion attributable to the complexity of operating the user interface. In this regard, we follow Shneiderman's theory of syntactic and semantic components of a UI. We present an experiment protocol that can be used to measure the workload experienced by users in their various cognitive resources while working with a computer. We then describe an experiment where we used the protocol to quantify the syntactic workload of two user interfaces. We use functional near infrared spectroscopy, a new brain imaging technology that is beginning to be used in HCI. We also discuss extensions of our techniques to adaptive interfaces.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. and Della Sala, S. Working memory and executive control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, (1996), 1397--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Boechler, P. How Spatial Is Hyperspace? Interacting with Hypertext Documents: Cognitive Processes and Concepts. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4,1,(2001) 23--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chance, B., Anday, E., Nioka, S., Zhou, S., Hong, L., Worden, K., Li, C. Murray, T., Ovetsky, Y., Thomas, R. A novel method for fast imaging of brain function, non-invasively, with light. Optics Express, 10, 2, (1988), 411--423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Czerwinski, M. and Larson, K. Cognition and the Web: Moving from Theory to Web Design. in Human Factors and Web Development, Ratner, J. (Ed.), Erlbaum: NJ, (2002), 147--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H. and Derman, D. Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gevins, A., Smith, M., McEvoy, L. and Yu, D. High-Resolution EEG Mapping of Cortical Activation Related to Working Memory: Effects of Task Difficulty, Type of Processing, and Practice. Cerebral Cortex, (1997), 374--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Friedman, D., Franceschini, M., Fantini, S., Corballis, P. and Gratton, E. Rapid Changes of Optical Parameters in the Human Brain During a Tapping Task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7. (1995), 446--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Grimes, D., Tan, D., Hudson, S., Shenoy, P. and Rao, R., Feasibility and Pragmatics of Classifying Working Memory Load with an Electroencephalograph. in Proc CHI 2008. ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. Development of NASA-TLX : Results of empirical and theoretical research. in Hancock, P., Meshkati, N. ed. Human Mental Workload, Amsterdam, (1988), pp 139 -- 183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Izzetoglu, K., Bunce, S., Onaral, B., Pourrezaei, K. and Chance, B. Functional Optical Brain Imaging Using Near-Infrared During Cognitive Tasks. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 2. (2004). 211--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. John, M.S., Kobus, D., Morrison, J. and Schmorrow, D. Overview of the DARPA Augmented Cognition Technical Integration Experiment. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 2. (2004), 131--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Keogh, E. and Pazzani, M., Scaling up dynamic time warping for datamining applications. in Proc. of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD, (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kohlmorgen, J., Dornhege, G., Braun, M, Blankertz, B., Muller, K., Curio, G., Hagemann, K., Bruns, A., Sharuf, M.,Kincses, W. Improving Human Performance in a Real Operating Environment through Real-Time Mental Workload Detection. Toward Brain Computer Interfacing, MIT Press, (2007), 409--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, K. and Czerwinski, M., Web Page Design: Implications of Memory, Structure and Scent for Information Retrieval. in Proc.CHI 1998, ACM Press, (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee, J.C. and Tan, D.S., Using a Low-Cost Electroencephalograph for Task Classification in HCI Research. in Proc. UIST 2006. ACM Press, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leung, H., Oh, H., Ferri, J. and Yi, Y. Load Response Functions in the Human Spatial Working Memory Circuit During Location Memory Updating. NeuroImage, 35, (2007), 368--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Muller, K.T., M., Dornhege, G., Krauledat, M., Curio, G. and Blankertz, B. Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From Brain-computer interfacing to mental state monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 167, 1, (2008), 82--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Parasuraman, R. and Caggiano, D. Neural and Genetic Assays of Human Mental Workload. in Quantifying Human Information Processing, Lexington Books, (2005), 123--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sassaroli, A., Zheng, F., Hirshfield, L.M., Girouard, A., Solovey, E.T., Jacob, R.J.K. and Fantini, S. Discrimination of mental workload levels in human subjects with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. in the Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, (2009), 227--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Fourth Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (2005), 86--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Smith, E. and Jonides, J. Storage and Executive Processes n the Frontal Lobes. Science, 283, (1999), 1657--1661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Son, I.-Y., Guhe, M., Gray, W., Yazici, B. and Schoelles, M. Human performance assessment using fNIR. Proc. of SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering, 5797. (2005), 158--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Wickens, C., Lee, J., Liu, Y., Becker, S. Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. Pearson, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Witten, I.H. and Frank, E. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, (2005), 196--197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhang, Q., Brown, E. and Strangman, G. Adaptive filtering for global interference cancellation and real-time recovery of evoked brain activity: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Journal of biomedical optics, 12, (2007), 044014-01 - 044014-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Brain measurement for usability testing and adaptive interfaces: an example of uncovering syntactic workload with functional near infrared spectroscopy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader