skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the affective tactics of an emotional pedagogical agent

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a quantitative (with students of a local middle school) and a qualitative evaluation (with teachers) of a lifelike and emotional pedagogical agent, called Pat. Pat has the goal of inferring students' emotions and applying affective tactics in order to adapt the learning environment. These tactics aim at motivating students and making them increase their efforts and their intrinsic motivation. Pat attempts to achieve these goals by presenting emotional animated attitudes and encouragement messages that are chosen dynamically to compose its affective tactics.

References

  1. C. Ames, Motivation: What teachers should know, Teachers College Record., Spring, 1990, pp. 409--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. André, T. Rist and J. Muller, Employing AI Methods to Control the Behavior of Animated Interface Agents, Applied Artificial Intelligence 13 (1999), pp. 415--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy, in R. Ramachaudran, ed., Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1994, pp. 71--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Bates, The role of emotion in believable agents, Communication of ACM, 37 (1994), pp. 122--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Bocca, P. A. Jaques and R. M. Viccari, Modelagem e Implementação da Interface para Apresentação de Comportamentos Animados e Emotivos de um Agente, Renote Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 1 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Burleson and R. W. Picard, Gender-Specific Approaches to Developing Emotionally Intelligent Learning Companions, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (2007), pp. 62--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Coles, Reading Lessons: The Debate over Literacy, Hill & Wang, New York, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Conati, Probabilistic Assessment of User's Emotions in Educational Games, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16 (2002), pp. 555--575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Elliott, J. Rickel and J. C. Lester, Lifelike Pedagogical Agents and Affective Computing: An Exploratory Synthesis, in M. Wooldridge and M. M. Veloso, eds., Artificial Intelligence Today, Springer, 1999, pp. 195--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Goleman, Emotional Intelligence, Bantam Books, New York, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. E. Izard, Emotion Cognition relationship and human development, Emotions, cognition and behavior, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 59--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. A. Jaques and R. M. Viccari, A BDI approach to infer student s emotions in an intelligent learning environment, Computers & Education, 49 (2007), pp. 360--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Lester, S. Converse, S. E. Kahler, S. T. Barlow, B. Stone and R. S. Bhogal, The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents, SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 1997, pp. 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Lester, S. A. Converse, B. Stone, S. Kahler and S. T. Barlow, Animated Pedagogical Agents and Problem-Solving Effectiveness: A Large-Scale Empirical Evaluation, in A. Boulay and A. Mizoguchi, eds., World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, Kobe, Japan, 1997, pp. 23--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Lester, S. Towns and P. Fitzgerald, Achieving Affective Impact: Visual Emotive Communication in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10 (1999), pp. 278--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Meece and W. McColskey, Improving Student Motivation, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Ortony, G. Clore and A. Collins, The Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Paiva, I. Machado and C. Martinho, Enriching Pedagogical Agents with Emotional Behavior: the Case of Vincent, AIED Life-like Pedagogical Agents, Le Mans, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Piaget, Les relations entre l'intelligence et l'affectivité dans le developpement de l'enfant, in B. Rimé and K. Scherer, eds., Les Émotions, Niestlé, Paris, 1989, pp. 75--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. W. Picard, Affective computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. e. a. Pintrich, A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, The Reg. of the University of Michigan, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff, BDI Agents: from Theory to Practice, Australian AI Institute, Melbourne, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. A. Silveira and R. M. Viccari, Developing distributed intelligent learning Environment with JADE - Java Agents for Distance Education Framework, International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, Biarritz, 2002, pp. 105--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. StatSoft, Basic Statistics, 1984--2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the affective tactics of an emotional pedagogical agent

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2009
        2347 pages
        ISBN:9781605581668
        DOI:10.1145/1529282

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 March 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader