skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529327acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A flexible QoS-aware routing protocol for infrastructure-less B3G networks

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current mobile devices support multiple network technologies and network composition via such devices can enable service provisioning across heterogeneous networks. One of the key challenges for realizing this view is inter-domain routing. Indeed, given the diversity of involved network technologies and infrastructures, a flexible routing protocol that takes into account their quality properties and dynamics is an important requirement. In this paper, we present a flexible quality-aware routing protocol for infrastructure-less B3G environments that enables discovery of routes with optimal bandwidth, delay or cost according to the preference of each client. The protocol is based on the Optimized Link-State Routing (OLSR) protocol and is designed to enable computation of quality-aware routes in multi-network environments. We detail the protocol, discuss its deployment and provide experimental results.

References

  1. S. Adjih et al. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol. RFC 3626, IETF, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Aslam, W. Phillips, and W. Robertson. Composite Metric for Quality of Service Routing in OLSR. In Proc. of the Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H. Badis, A. Munaretto, K. A. Agha, and G. Pujolle. QoS for Ad hoc Networking Based on Multiple Metrics: Bandwidth and Delay. In Proc. of the IFIP-TC6 Int. Conf. on Mobile and Wireless Communications Networks, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. S. Cardoso, P.-G. Raverdy, and V. Issarny. A Privacy-Aware Service Discovery Middleware for Pervasive Environments. In Proc. of the Joint iTrust and PST Conf. on Privacy, Trust Management and Security (IFIPTM'07), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. Ferrus et al. A Feasible Approach for QoS Management in Coordinated Heterogeneous Radio Access Networks. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Performance, Computing, and Communications (IPCCC'05), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Ge, T. Kunz, and L. Lamont. Quality of Service Routing in Ad-Hoc Networks Using OLSR. In Proc. of the Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS'03), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Issarny et al. PLASTIC Deliverable 3.1: Middleware Specification and Architecture. PLASTIC Deliverable, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Jacquet et al. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Multi Topic Conf. (INMIC'01), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. K. J. Lee, M. S. Kim, S. Y. Cho, and B. I. Mun. Delay-Centric Link Quality Aware OLSR. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Local Computer Networks (LCN'05), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Liu and V. Issarny. An Incentive Compatible Reputation Mechanism for Ubiquitous Computing Environments. International Journal of Information Security, 6(5), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. Mohr and R. Becher. Mobile Communications Beyond Third Generation. In Proc. of the 52nd Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC'2000), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Natarajan. On Systems Beyond 3G: Requirements and Approaches. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Communication Technology (ICCT'03), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. L. Needham and N. Natarajan. QoS in B3G Networks - An Overview. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Communication Technology (ICCT'03), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D.-Q. Nguyen and P. Minet. QoS support and OLSR Routing in a Mobile Ad hoc Network. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Networking, Int. Conf. on Systems and Int. Conf. on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (ICNICONSMCL'06), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561, IETF, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C.-H. Yeh. ACENET: Architectures and Protocols for High Throughput, Low Power, and QoS Provisioning in Next-Generation Mobile Communications. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W. Zhuang, Y.-S. Gan, K.-J. Loh, and K.-C. Chua. Policy-based QoS Management Architecture in an Integrated UMTS and WLAN Environment. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(11), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A flexible QoS-aware routing protocol for infrastructure-less B3G networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2009
      2347 pages
      ISBN:9781605581668
      DOI:10.1145/1529282

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader