skip to main content
10.1145/1576246.1531332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward evaluating lighting design interface paradigms for novice users

Published:27 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Lighting design is a complex but fundamental task in computer cinematography, involving the adjustment of light parameters to define final scene appearance. Many user interfaces have been proposed to simplify lighting design. They can be generally categorized in three paradigms: direct light parameter manipulation, indirect light feature manipulation (e.g., shadow dragging), and goal-based optimization of lighting through painting. To this date, no formal evaluation of the relative effectiveness of these paradigms has been performed.

In this paper, we present a first step toward evaluating the benefits of these three paradigms in the form of a user study with a focus on novice users. 20 subjects participated in the experiment by performing various trials on simple scenes with up to 8 point lights, designed to test two lighting tasks: precise adjustment of lighting and the artistic exploration of lighting configurations. We collected objective and subjective data and found that subjects can light well with direct and indirect interfaces, preferring the latter. Paint-based goal specification was found to be significantly worse than the other paradigms, especially since users tend to sketch rather than accurately paint goal images, an input that painting algorithms were not designed for. We also found that given enough time, novices can perform relatively complex lighting tasks, unhindered by geometry or lighting complexity. Finally, we believe that our study will impact the design of future lighting interfaces and it will serve as the basis for designing additional experiments to reach a comprehensive evaluation of lighting interfaces.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tps059_09.mp4

References

  1. Adobe Systems Inc, 2009. Photoshop CS 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. An, X., and Pellacini, F. 2008. AppProp: all-pairs appearance-space edit propagation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3, 40:1--40:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anrys, F., and Dutré, P. 2004. Image based lighting design. In 4th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Autodesk Inc, 2008. Softimage xsi 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Autodesk Inc, 2009. Maya 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Calahan, S. 1999. Storytelling through lighting, a computer graphics perspective. In Advanced RenderMan: Creating CGI for Motion Pictures, A. A. Apodaca, L. Gritz, and R. Barzel, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann, 223--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner, B. D., Snibbe, S. S., Herndon, K. P., Robbins, D. C., Zeleznik, R. C., and van Dam, A. 1992. Three-dimensional widgets. In Proc. of the 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 183--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Costa, A. C., Sousa, A. A., and Ferreira, F. N. 1999. Lighting design: A goal based approach using optimization. In Rendering Techniques '99, 317--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Friedman, M. 1937. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 32, 200, 675--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gleicher, M., and Witkin, A. 1992. Through-the-lens camera control. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '92, 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gumhold, S. 2002. Maximum entropy light source placement. In VIS '02: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '02, 275--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kawai, J. K., Painter, J. S., and Cohen, M. F. 1993. Radioptimization - goal based rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '93, 147--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, C. H., Hao, X., and Varshney, A. 2004. Light collages: Lighting design for effective visualization. In VIS '04: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '04, 281--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marks, J., Andalman, B., Beardsley, P. A., Freeman, W., Gibson, S., Hodgins, J. K., Kang, T., Mirtich, B., Pfister, H., Ruml, W., Ryall, K., Seims, J., and Shieber, S. 1997. Design galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '97, 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Marks, J., Mirtich, B., Ratajczak, D., Ryall, K., Anderson, D., Anderson, D., Anderson, E., Anderson, E., Lesh, N., and Lesh, N. 2000. Human-guided simple search. In In Proc. of AAAI 2000, 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mohan, A., Tumblin, J., Bodenheimer, B., Grimm, C., and Bailey, R. 2005. Table-top computed lighting for practical digital photography. In Rendering Techniques 2005: 16th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 165--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Okabe, M., Matsushita, Y., Shen, L., and Igarashi, T. 2007. Illumination brush: Interactive design of all-frequency lighting. 171--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Patow, G., and Pueyo, X. 2003. A survey of inverse rendering problems. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 22, 663--687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pellacini, F., and Lawrence, J. 2007. Appwand: Editing measured materials using appearance-driven optimization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3, 54:1--54:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pellacini, F., Tole, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 2002. A user interface for interactive cinematic shadow design. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 563--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pellacini, F., Battaglia, F., Morley, R. K., and Finkelstein, A. 2007. Lighting with paint. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 2, 9:1--9:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Poulin, P., and Fournier, A. 1992. Lights from highlights and shadows. In SI3D '92: Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, 31--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Poulin, P., Ratib, K., and Jacques, M. 1997. Sketching shadows and highlights to position lights. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 97, 56--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Schoeneman, C., Dorsey, J., Smits, B., Arvo, J., and Greenberg, D. 1993. Painting with light. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '93, 143--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shacked, R., and Lischinski, D. 2001. Automatic lighting design using a perceptual quality metric. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 20, 215--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shesh, A., and Chen, B. 2007. Crayon lighting: sketch-guided illumination of models. In GRAPHITE '07: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia, 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Stevens, J. P. 1996. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, third ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vangorp, P., Laurijssen, J., and Dutré, P. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3, 77:1--77:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Toward evaluating lighting design interface paradigms for novice users

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGGRAPH '09: ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 papers
                July 2009
                795 pages
                ISBN:9781605587264
                DOI:10.1145/1576246

                Copyright © 2009 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 27 July 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                SIGGRAPH '09 Paper Acceptance Rate78of439submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

                Upcoming Conference

                SIGGRAPH '24

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader