ABSTRACT
This paper presents the results of a case study examining prototyping as a method in re-designing a user interface (UI). In the case presented, a web-based room booking was re-designed. Running on a university web site, the existing system has caused much critique amongst its users. Their expectations for a new UI were increased ease of use, less effort required, and less time consumed. We prototyped a new UI using Visio and tested it with a small number of experienced and novice users. Our results partly favor the existing system and partly the new one. To our surprise, experienced users performed relatively poorer with the new UI considering their critique of the existing one. We found paper prototyping to be an efficient method to gain user feedback on usability issues and that a low-fidelity prototype does not automatically mean low-effort testing. We observed that visible-state UI elements can be demanding to test through paper prototyping.
- Bryan-Kimms, N., and Hamilton, F. 2002. One for all and all for one? Case studies of using prototypes in commercial projects. In Proc. NordiCHI'02, ACM, pp. 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education Ltd, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ED Booking System, Chalmers, Gothenburg: www.ed.chalmers.se/bokningssystemGoogle Scholar
- Jurca, A. 2000. Consumer-centered interfaces: customizing online travel planning. In Proc. CHI '00 Ext. Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 93--94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiris, E. 2004. User-centered eService design and redesign. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM, pp. 990--999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCurdy, M., Connors, C., Pyrzak, Guy, Kanefsky, B., and A. Vera. 2006. Breaking the fidelity barrier: An examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success. In Proc. CHI 2006, pp. 1233--1242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Microsoft Office Visio 2003 Professional, Microsoft, 2003.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. 2003. Paper prototyping: Getting user data before you code. www.useit.com/alertbox/20030414.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Rettig, M. 1994. Prototyping for Tiny Fingers. In Communications of the ACM, 27(4), pp. 21--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teuber, C., Forbrig, P. 2004. Different types of patterns for online-booking systems. In Proc. 3rd Annual Conference on Task models and diagrams, pp 91--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walker, M., Takayama, L., and Landay, J. High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer medium? In Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Meeting: HFES2002, pp. 661--665.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Expert habits vs. UI improvements: re-design of a room booking system
Recommendations
An Exploration of Low-Fidelity Prototyping Methods for Augmented and Virtual Reality
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive EnvironmentsAbstractLow-fidelity prototyping is well-established method of developing concepts for traditional two-dimensional user interfaces. This paper considers the techniques and methods that can be used for simulating and early testing of augmented and virtual ...
UI Design Pattern-driven Rapid Prototyping for Agile Development of Mobile Applications
MobileHCI '19: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and ServicesIn agile development, lean UX designers perform rapid prototyping and quick evaluation of prototypes to ensure fast releases. To understand designers' workflow during rapid prototyping, we interviewed 15 lean UX designers. We identified the following ...
Scenario-based interactive UI design
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsClearly picturing user behavior is one of the key requirements when designing successful interactive software. However, covering all possible user behaviors with one UI is a complex challenge. The Scenario-based Interactive UI Design tool is designed to ...
Comments