skip to main content
10.5555/1531826.1531831guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesbcs-hciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading

Published:01 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to maximize online reading performance and comprehension, how should a designer choose typographical variables such as font size and font type? This paper presents an eye tracking study of how font size and font type affect online reading. In a between-subjects design, we collected data from 82 subjects reading stories formatted in a variety of point sizes, san serif, and serif fonts. Reading statistics such as reading speed were computed, and post-tests of comprehension were recorded. For smaller font sizes, fixation durations are significantly longer, resulting in slower reading -- but not significantly slower. While there were no significant differences in serif vs. san serif fonts, serif reading was slightly faster. Significant eye tracking differences were found for demographic variables such as age group and whether English is the subject's first language.

References

  1. Tinker, M. Legibility of Print. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa (1963)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Paterson, D. G., Tinker, M. A. Studies of Typographical Factors Influencing Speed of Reading: II. Size of Type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13:2 (1929), 120--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., Schleske, M. M. Psychophysics of Reading: I. Normal Vision, Vision Research, 25:2 (1985), 239--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bernard, M., Lida, B., Riley, S., Hackler, T., Janzen, K. Comparison of Popular Online Fonts: Which Size and Type is Best? Usability News, 4.1, (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Paterson, D. G., Tinker, M. A. Studies of Typographical Factors Influencing Speed of Reading: X. Style of Type Face. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16:6 (1932), 605--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boyarski, D., Neuwirth, C., Forlizzi, J., Regli, S. H. A Study of Fonts Designed for Screen Display. Proc. CHI 1998. 87--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. The Psychology of Reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1989)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Paterson, D. G., Tinker, M. A. The Effect of Typography upon the Perceptual Span in Reading. American Journal of Psychology, 60 (1947), 388--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tinker, M. A., Paterson, D. G. The Effect of Typographical Variations upon Eye Movement in Reading. Journal of Educational Research, 49 (1955), 171--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Morrison, R. E., Rayner, K. Saccade Size in Reading Depends upon Character Spaces and Not Visual Angle. Perception and Psychophysics, 30:4 (1981), 395--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Beymer, D. and Russell, D. WebGazeAnalyzer: A System for Capturing and Analyzing Web Reading Behavior Using Eye Gaze. In CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts. 1913--1916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Beymer, D., Russell, D., Orton, P. Wide vs. Narrow Paragraphs: An Eye Tracking Analysis. In Interact 2005. 741--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kemper, S. and McDowd, J. Eye movements of Young and Older Adults while Reading with Distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21:1 (2006), 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Oller, J. W. Assessing Competence in ESL: Reading. TESOL Quarterly, 6:4 (1972), 313--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yen, M.-H. and Radach, R. Saccades and binocular coordination in reading: Effects of viewing distance and font size, In 14th European Conference on Eye Movements (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Darroch, I., Goodman, J., Brewster, S. A., and Gray, P. D. The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers, In Interact 2005, 253--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      BCS-HCI '08: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 2
      September 2008
      263 pages
      ISBN:9781906124069
      • Conference Chair:
      • David England

      Publisher

      BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

      Swindon, United Kingdom

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2008

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate28of62submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader