skip to main content
10.1145/1542084.1542121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comprehensive view on user studies: survey and open issues for mobile TV

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the future Mobile TV will play a major role amongst traditional TV services. However, since Mobile TV brings new aspects into television, like small screens, consumption in noisy surroundings, etc., it also represents a new challenge on how to create, transfer and present content that maximizes the consumer experience. In the past, research has been often focusing on one particular aspect of this new TV scheme, as well as surveys on this research often neglected aspects that still might be of interest when trying to understand the dependencies of Mobile TV content and presentation to perceived quality.

In this survey paper we want to discuss challenges and requirements in a comprehensive way, trying to shed light on all relevant aspects of Mobile TV. The aim of this paper is to give a good overview about the state of the art with the focus of users' need and experiences. Furthermore, we want to point out interesting and open issues which are relevant for further research work.

References

  1. I.-T. S. G. 12. Quality of Experience Requirements for IPTV Services. ITU-T Recommendations G.1080, ITU, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ARD/ZDF. Mobiles Fernsehen: Interessen, potentielle Nutzungskontexte und Einstellungen der Bevölkerung. Media Perspektiven, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Roibás and S.Johnson. Unfolding the User Experience in New Scenarios of Pervasive Interactive TV. In Ext. Abstr. CHI, pages 1259--1264, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Svoen. Consumers, Participants, and Creators: Young People's Diverse Use of Television and New Media. Comput. Entertain., 5(2), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Breunig. Mobile Television in Germany. Media Perspektiven, 11, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Carlsson and P. Walden. Mobile TV -- To Live or Die by Content. In Proc. of the 40th HICSS, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Sodergard. Mobile Television -- Technology and User Experiences. VTT PUBLICATIONS, 506, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Geerts, P. Cesar, and D. Bulterman. The Implications of Program Genres for the Design of Social Television Systems. In Proc. of the 1st UXTV, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Stone, C. Jarrett, and M. Woodroffe. User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufman Publ Inc, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Vatolin, A. Moskvin, and O. Petrov. MSU Video Quality Measurement Tool. http://compression.graphicon.ru/video/quality_measure/index_en.html {Referred 17.02.2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Zillmann. The Coming of Media Entertainment. In D. Zillmann and P. Vorderer, editors, Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal, pages 1--20. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Agboma and A. Liotta. User Centric Assessment of Mobile Contents Delivery. In Proc. of the 6th MoMM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Casella and E. Lehmann. Theory of Point Estimation (Springer texts in statistics). Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Graf. Mobisodes & co -- ein Praxistest. Magazin TENDENZ, 1, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Guardian. Mini-series for Upwardly Mobile Chinese. Guardian News & Media 2008, 2005. http://www.qualcomm.com/common/documents/white\_papers/MF\_WP\_FLOvsDVBH.pdf {Referred 17.02.2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. Hanington. Methods in the Making: A Perspective on the State of Human Research in Design. Design Issues, 19(4):9--18, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Crump, E. Schneiders, and D. Hoss. Renaissance der Terrestrik. Digitalmagazin, 2, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Knoche and J. McCarthy. Mobile Users' Needs and Expectations of Future Multimedia Services. In Proc. of WWRF12, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Knoche, J. McCarthy, and A. Sasse. Can Small Be Beautiful? Assessing Image Resolution Requirements for Mobile TV. In Proc. of the 13th ACM Multimedia Conf., 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Knoche, J. McCarthy, and M.A. Sasse. How Low Can You Go? The Effect of Low Resolutions on Shot Types in Mobile TV. Multimedia Tools Appl., 36(1-2):145--166, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Knoche, J. McCarthy, and M. Sasse. Reading the Fine Print: The Effect of Text Legibility on Perceived Video Quality in Mobile TV. In Proc. of the 14th ACM MM Conf., Santa Barbara, USA, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Knoche and M.A. Sasse. Getting the Big Picture on Small Screens: Quality of Experience in Mobile TV. Idea Group, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. H. Knoche, M. Papaleo, M. Sasse, and A. Vanelli-Coralli. The Kindest Cut: Enhancing the User Experience of Mobile TV through Adequate Zooming. In Proc. of the 15th Intern. Conf. on Multimedia (MM'07), pages 87--96, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. Knoche and M. Sasse. The Sweet Spot: How People Trade Off Size and Definition on Mobile Devices. In Proc. of the 16th ACM Intern. Conf. on Multimedia (MM'08), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C.-H. Hsu and M. Hefeeda. Bounding switching delay in mobile tv broadcast networks. In Proc. SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking 2009, volume 7253, 72530A, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Y.J. Chipchase, C. Yanqing. Personal Television: A Qualitative Study of Mobile TV Users in South Korea. In Proc. of MobileHCI, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Jensen. Interactive Television: New Genres, New Format, New Content. In Proc. of the 2nd. Australasian IE '05, pages 89--96, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Wippersberg. Die Forderung nach "sehbarem Fernsehen". In TV 3.0 Journalistische und politische Herausforderungen des Fernsehens im Digitalen Zeitalter, Germany, Berlin, March 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. K. Miyauchi, T. Sugahara, and H. Oda. Relax or Study? A Qualitative User Study on the Usage of Mobile TV and Video. In Proc. of the 6th EuroITV, volume 5066/2008, pages 128--132, Salzburg, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. K. O'Hara, A.S. Mitchell, and A. Vorbau. Consuming Video on Mobile Devices. In Proc. of the Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. L. Eronen. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Data in User Research on Digital Television. In Proc. of the 1st Panhellenic Conf. PC HCI '01, pages 51--56, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. L. Eronen. User Centered Research Methods for Interactive Television. In Proc. of the 3rd. EuroITV, pages 15--26, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Pemberton and R. Griffiths. Usability Evaluation Techniques for Interactive Television. In Proc. 10th HCII, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Stockbridge. Mobile TV: Experience of the UK Vodafone and Sky Service. In Proc. of the 4th EuroITV, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky. User Experience -- A Research Agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2):91--97, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. J. Mäki. Finnish Mobile TV Results. Research International Finnland, August 2005. http://www.mobiletv.nokia.com/onAir/finland/files/RI_Press.pdf{Referred 17.02.2009}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. Maguire and N. Bevan. User Requirements Analysis: A Review of Supporting Methods. In Proc. of the IFIP 17th -- TC13 Stream, pages 133--148, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. M. Obrist, S. Kepplinger, E. Beck, M. Tscheligi, and P. Muzak. Usability & User Experience: Preliminary Results from Evaluating an IPTV Community Platform. In Proc. of the 6th Europ. Conf. EuroITV. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. V.M.M. Rezaei, I. Bouazizi. Optimal Channel Changing Delay for Mobile TV Over DVB-H. In Proc. of PORTABLE07, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Rice and N. Alm. Designing New Interfaces for Digital Interactive Television Usable by Older Adults. Comput. Entertain., 6(1):1--20, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. J.M. Siller. QoS Arbitration for Improving the QoE in Multimedia Transmission. In IEEE Proc. Intern. Conf. on Visual Information Engineering, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. M. Vangenck, A. Jacobs, B. Lievens, E. Vanhengel, and J. Pierson. Does Mobile Television Challenge the Dimension of Viewing Television? In Proc. of the 6th EuroITV, volume 5066/2008, pages 122--127, Salzburg, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. N. Ende, H. Hesselle, and L. Meesters. Towards Content-Aware Coding: User Study . Interactive TV: a Shared Experience, 4471:185--194, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. N. Friedrich. Nutzung? Forschung! Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Umfrage. In TVienna, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. N. Menon, M. Page, M. Watt, and S. Bell. Mobile Data Services: a Selection of Key Findings. In Proc. of Mobinet '05, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Nokia. DVB-H. Mobile TV Forum, December 18 2008. http://www.mobiletv.nokia.com/technology/dvb/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. O. Petrovic, M. Fallenböck, C. Kittl, and A. Langl. Mobile TV in Austria. Schriftenreihe der Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH, 2, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. S. Orgad. This Box was made for Walking. 2006. http://www.intomobile.com/2006/11/10/this-box-was-made-for-walking.html {Referred 10.10.2006}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. P. Cesar, D. Bulterman, D. Geerts, J. Jansen, H. Knoche, and W. Seager. Enhancing Social Sharing of Videos: Fragment,Annotate, Enrich and Share. In Proc. of the 16th ACM MM Conf., 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. P. Repo, K. Hyvönen, M. Pantzar, and P. Timonen. Users Inventing Ways to Enjoy New Mobile Services - The Case of Watching Mobile Videos. In Proc. of the 37th HICSS, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. R. Bernhaupt, M. Obrist, A. Weiss, E. Beck, and M. Tscheligi. Trends in the Living Room and Beyond: Results from Ethnographic Studies Using Creative and Playful Probing. Comput. Entertain., 6(1):1--23, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. R. Bernhaupt, M. Obrist, and M. Tscheligi. Usability and Usage of ITV Services: Lessons Learned in an Austrian Field Trial. Comput. Entertain., 5(2), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. R. Harper, T. Regan, and M. Rouncefield. Taking Hold of TV: Learning from the Literature. In Proc. of 18th Australia Conf. on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '06), Sydney, Australia, Nov 20-24 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. S. Buchinger and H. Hlavacs. Subjective Quality of Mobile MPEG-4 Videos with Different Frame Rates. Journal of Mobile Multimedia (JMM), 1(4), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. S. Buchinger and H. Hlavacs. Optimal Server Bandwidth for Mobile Video on Demand. submitted to Annals of Telecommunications, Special Issue on QoE and Socio-Economic Issues of Network-Based Services, submitted in 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. S. Jumisko-Pyykkö and J. Häkkinen. Evaluation of Subjective Video Quality of Mobile Devices. In Proc. 13th ACM MM Conf., 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. S. Jumisko-Pyykkö, M. Weitzel, and D. Strohmeier. Designing for User Experience: What to Expect from Mobile 3D TV and Video? In Proc. of the 1st Intern. Conf. on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video (UXTV '08), pages 183--192, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. V. Oksman, E. Noppari, A. Tammela, M. Mäkinen, and V. Ollikainen. Mobile TV in Everyday Life Contexts -- Individual Entertainment or Shared Experiences? In Proc. 5th EuroITV, pages 215--225, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. A. Watson. Toward a Perceptual Video Quality Metric. In SPIE proc. series, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. F. Xiao. DCT-based Video Quality Evaluation. 2000. http://compression.ru/video/quality_measure/vqm.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Z. Hussain, M. Lechner, H. Milchrahm, S. Shahzad, W. Slany, M. Umgeher, T. Vlk, and P. Wolkerstorfer. User Interface Design for a Mobile Multimedia Application: An Iterative Approach. In Proc. of the 1st ACHI Conf., pages 189--194, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Zukunft Digital. Mobile TV Studie. Werben & Verkaufen, 36, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Z. Wang, E. Simoncelli, and A. Bovik. Multi-scale Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment. In Proc. of the 37th IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, pages 1398--1402, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A comprehensive view on user studies: survey and open issues for mobile TV

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
      June 2009
      240 pages
      ISBN:9781605583402
      DOI:10.1145/1542084

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader