skip to main content
10.1145/1543834.1543856acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Large-scale optimization using immune algorithm

Published:12 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Immune-inspired optimization algorithms encoded the parameters into individuals where each individual represents a search point in the space of potential solutions. A large number of parameters would result in a large search space. Nowadays, there is little report about immune algorithms effectively solving numerical optimization problems with more than 100 parameters. In this paper, we introduce an improved immune algorithm, termed as Dual-Population Immune Algorithm (DPIA), to solve large-scale optimization problems. DPIA adopts two side-by-side populations, antibody population and memory population. The antibody population employs the cloning, affinity maturation, and selection operators, which emphasizes the global search. The memory population stores current representative antibodies and the update of the memory population pay more attention to maintain the population diversity. Normalized decimal-string representation makes DPIA more suitable for solving large-scale optimization problems. Special mutation and recombination methods are adopted to simulate the somatic mutation and receptor editing process. Experimental results on eight benchmark problems show that DPIA is effective to solve large-scale numerical optimization problems.

References

  1. L.N. de Castro, J. Timmis. Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Approach. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Y. Ishida. Fully Distributed Diagnosis by PDP Learning Algorithm: Towards Immune Network PDP Model. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, (1990) 777--782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Forrest, A.S. Perelson, L. Allen, R. Cherukuri. Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, (1994) 202--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Tarakanov, D. Dasgupta. A formal model of an artificial immune system. BioSystems, 55(1/3) (2000) 151--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. F. Gonzalez, D. Dasgupta, R. Kozma. Combining Negative Selection and Classification Techniques for Anomaly Detection. In: Proceedings of the special sessions on artificial immune systems in Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J.H. Carter. The Immune System as a model for Pattern Recognition and classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7(3) (2000) 28--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Timmis, M. Neal, J. Hunt. An artificial immune system for data analysis. Biosystems, 55(1/3) (2000) 143--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. U. Garain, M. P. Chakraborty, D. Dasgupta. Recognition of Handwritten Indic Script using Clonal Selection Algorithm. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems. Oeiras, Portugal: September, 2006. 256--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L.N. de Castro, F.J. Von Zuben. Learning and Optimization Using the Clonal Selection Principle. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(3) (2002) 239--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. N. de Castro, J. Timmis. An Artificial Immune Network for Multimodal Function Optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 1, (2002) 699--704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Kelsey, J. Timmis. Immune inspired somatic contiguous hypermutation for function optimisation. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, volume 2723 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (2003) 207--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S.M. Garrett. Parameter-free, Adaptive Clonal Selection. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computing, Portland, Oregon, (2004) 1052--1058.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. V. Cutello, G. Nicosia, M. Pavone. Exploring the Capability of Immune Algorithms: A Characterization of Hypemutation Operators. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3239 (2004) 263--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. V. Cutello, G.Narzisi, G. Nicosia, M. Pavone. Clonal Selection Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study Using Effective Mutation Potentials. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3627 (2005) 13--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Maoguo Gong, Licheng Jiao, Wenping Ma, Shuiping Gou. Solving Multidimensional Knapsack Problems by an Immune-inspired Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Singapore, (2007) 3385--3391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Fukuda, K Mori, M. Tsukiyama. Immune networks using genetic algorithm for adaptive production scheduling. In 15th IFAC World Congress, Vol. 3 (1993) 57--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Maoguo Gong, Licheng Jiao, Fang Liu, Haifeng Du. The Quaternion Model of Artificial Immune Response. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Artificial Immune Systems, Banff, Canada (2005) 207--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Berek, M. Ziegner. The maturation of the immune response. Immunology Today, Vol. 14, No. 8 (1993) 400--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. J. T. George, D. Gray. Receptor editing during affinity maturation. Immunology Today. Vol. 20, No. 4 (1999) 196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S.Y. Ho, L.S. Shu, J.H. Chen. Intelligent Evolutionary Algorithms for large Parameter Optimization Problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. Vol. 8, No. 6 (2004) 522--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Large-scale optimization using immune algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GEC '09: Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
      June 2009
      1112 pages
      ISBN:9781605583266
      DOI:10.1145/1543834

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader